Addendum:
On 2012-06-11 22:31, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
3. kernel
a. Download a kernel from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/ .
b. Unpack and apply patch 0001.
c. For 3.3 or newer kernels, apply patch 0002.
d. For make xconfig, apply patch 0003.
e. For make nconfig, apply patch 0004.
*
On 6/12/2012 11:43 PM, Robert Lewis wrote:
do not reply to a different thread to open a new thread.
How does one increase the stack size of an application using Cygwin? I have
googled this and found suggestions such as adding
-W1,--stack,800
-Wl not -W1 to pass the dato to the linker
On 6/12/2012 4:43 PM, Robert Lewis wrote:
How does one increase the stack size of an application using Cygwin?
I have googled this and found suggestions such as adding
-W1,--stack,800
^
Wrong, change the "1" to the letter "l".
to make the stack 8 meg. However, this doesn't work for
How does one increase the stack size of an application using Cygwin? I have
googled this and found suggestions such as adding
-W1,--stack,800
to make the stack 8 meg. However, this doesn't work for me. I include this as
an option to gcc in my makefile and bash just reports an error messa
On 6/12/2012 7:08 PM, Roger K. Wells wrote:
On 06/12/2012 11:10 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, James Johnston wrote:
Wikipedia says that ...
Wikipedia isn't the keeper of the information relevant to Cygwin. You
can only find the truth at cygwin.com. Besides, compa
On 06/12/2012 11:10 AM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, James Johnston wrote:
Wikipedia says that ...
Wikipedia isn't the keeper of the information relevant to Cygwin. You
can only find the truth at cygwin.com. Besides, companies do support
open source projects by provi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 09:32:00AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 06/12/2012 09:12 AM, Nick Lowe wrote:
>> http://cygwin.com/
>>
>> "The Cygwin DLL and utilities are Copyright ? 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
>> 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Red Hat, Inc"
>
>Yes, that's true for the
On 12/06/2012 12:34 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 6/12/2012 9:17 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:31:59PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Prerequisites:
[snip]
Nice, Yaakov.
Indeed, this is a real cool addition to Cygwin's capabilities Yaakov.
:-)
Should we mak
On 6/12/2012 9:17 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:31:59PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Prerequisites:
[snip]
Nice, Yaakov.
Indeed, this is a real cool addition to Cygwin's capabilities Yaakov.
:-)
Should we make this a FAQ entry or even a separate cygwin web pag
On 06/12/2012 09:12 AM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> http://cygwin.com/
>
> "The Cygwin DLL and utilities are Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
> 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Red Hat, Inc"
Yes, that's true for the cygwin1.dll. But it's not all the executables
available from cygwi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 04:12:58PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
>http://cygwin.com/
>
>"The Cygwin DLL and utilities are Copyright ? 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
>2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Red Hat, Inc"
The version of Cygwin supported at cygwin.com is a GPL-based free
software pro
On 12 June 2012 14:13, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 6/12/2012 1:52 PM, Peter Ross wrote:
>>
>> On 12 June 2012 12:35, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
>>>
If I downgrade from 1.7.15 to 1.7.14 then it runs as expected
>>>
>>> And if you upgrade
http://cygwin.com/
"The Cygwin DLL and utilities are Copyright © 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003,
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Red Hat, Inc"
> Wikipedia isn't the keeper of the information relevant to Cygwin. You
> can only find the truth at cygwin.com. Besides, companies do supp
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, James Johnston wrote:
> Wikipedia says that ...
Wikipedia isn't the keeper of the information relevant to Cygwin. You
can only find the truth at cygwin.com. Besides, companies do support
open source projects by providing man hours to it. It doesn't mean
that t
To me, the key question is:
Would Red Hat have an objection in principle to signing Cygwin and its
packages given the history and ties.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubs
> >Red Hat might not have to buy a code signing cert for this. They might
> >already have one that will work: http://goo.gl/5Hm3C
>
> The Cygwin project is not Red Hat. It wouldn't be "Red Hat" buying
anything.
What is the Cygwin project then? I honestly thought it was a Red Hat
project... I.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:31:59PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
>Prerequisites:
>[snip]
Nice, Yaakov.
Should we make this a FAQ entry or even a separate cygwin web page?
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 06:57:45AM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>On 6/9/2012 9:57 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>and I'm really not willing to burden cygwin.com with the cycles
>>necessary to unpack tarballs at cygwin.com to sign them.
>
>Based on the traffic I see to cygwin-apps, my sense is that t
-BEGIN Original Message-
From: Andy Koppe
On 11 June 2012 13:55, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
> I don't get
> the U+009F result from the "/" key from any combination of Ctrl
> and Shift.
On a US keyboard, Shift+"/" is "?", and Ctrl+"?" is itself a valid
control character combination, producing ^
On 6/11/2012 11:10 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 6/11/2012 7:39 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 6/10/2012 10:54 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2012-06-10 19:45, Ken Brown wrote:
The bisection shows that the first problematic commit is this one:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?h=glib-2-32&id=7eae4
On 6/9/2012 9:57 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
and I'm really
not willing to burden cygwin.com with the cycles necessary to unpack
tarballs at cygwin.com to sign them.
Based on the traffic I see to cygwin-apps, my sense is that this would
amount to single-digit CPU-minutes per day, once you g
On 6/12/2012 1:52 PM, Peter Ross wrote:
On 12 June 2012 12:35, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
If I downgrade from 1.7.15 to 1.7.14 then it runs as expected
And if you upgrade to the newest cygwin.com/snapshots what happens?
Replacing cygwin1.dll wit
On 12 June 2012 12:35, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
>
>>
>> If I downgrade from 1.7.15 to 1.7.14 then it runs as expected
>>
>
> And if you upgrade to the newest cygwin.com/snapshots what happens?
>
Replacing cygwin1.dll with cygwin1-20120611.dll.bz2 and i
On 11/06/2012 11:31 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
Prerequisites:
* Cygwin snapshot 1.7.16s/20120611 or newer (DLL and headers)
* Cygwin gcc4-core 4.5 or newer, make, perl
* Cygwin gettext, libelf-devel, libgmp-devel, libmpc-devel,
libmpfr-devel, zlib-devel
* (for make menuconfig) libncurses-de
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
>
> If I downgrade from 1.7.15 to 1.7.14 then it runs as expected
>
And if you upgrade to the newest cygwin.com/snapshots what happens?
--
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.
I compiled the following simple C# program using Mono 2.10.8
public class Hello {
public static void Main() {
System.Console.WriteLine("hello");
}
}
I then attempt to run it under mono and native .net
# mcs Hello.cs
# mono Hello.exe
hello
# ./Hello.exe
If I down
26 matches
Mail list logo
