Re: cvs 1.11.21-1 still experimental

2006-03-06 Thread Charles Wilson
Eric Blake wrote: The experimental version of cvs (1.11.21-1) has been in the experimental state since November. Isn't it ready for 'current' status yet? I would like to see this resolved first, if the maintainer is listening: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg01385.html Oh. That. To

RE: bash "Couldn't Allocate Heap" error - info.

2006-03-06 Thread Antony Baxter
Jonathan, Gunnar, Excellent! Well done. Stopping that service does indeed allow Cygwin to work properly again. Gunnar - yes, its the process that makes the face overlay work. I think I can live without this, though it'll be a great disappointment to my 2.5 yr old nephew who thinks that his uncle

Re: cvs 1.11.21-1 still experimental

2006-03-06 Thread Charles Wilson
Jerry D. Hedden wrote: The experimental version of cvs (1.11.21-1) has been in the experimental state since November. Isn't it ready for 'current' status yet? Dunno. I never got any feedback, so I guess nobody has tested it. Therefore, it's still in testing. -- Chuck -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: cvs 1.11.21-1 still experimental

2006-03-06 Thread Eric Blake
> The experimental version of cvs (1.11.21-1) has been in the experimental > state since November. Isn't it ready for 'current' status yet? I would like to see this resolved first, if the maintainer is listening: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-01/msg01385.html -- Eric Blake -- Unsubscribe in

RE: bash "Couldn't Allocate Heap" error - info.

2006-03-06 Thread Gunnar Norling
Thanks for the enlightment. I turned the service to `Manual' for now. Funny to see what the service manager says: Display Name: Logitech Process Manager Description: Webcam Effects Helper Is that supposed to be the ``face overlay'' features, or? Haven't yet scanned the Logitech support site/foru

Re: "tput init" fails - TERMINFO

2006-03-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Quite late, but... Cédric Bretaudeau, le Fri 10 Feb 2006 10:25:56 +, a écrit : > >Brian Dessent, le Fri 10 Feb 2006 01:25:45 -0800, a écrit : > >> Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> > >> > in man 5 terminfo, there is no init string indeed. There is is1, is2 > >and > >> > is3 however. See furthe

cvs 1.11.21-1 still experimental

2006-03-06 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
The experimental version of cvs (1.11.21-1) has been in the experimental state since November. Isn't it ready for 'current' status yet? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.c

Re: seg fault in cygwin1.dll during gdb session

2006-03-06 Thread Brian Dessent
Shmuel Vagner wrote: > My question: Is there a patch for this and how can I install it (does it > involves building Cygwin from source or is there another simpler way)? Patches to avoid the spurious SIGSEGV faults are already in CVS for both Cygwin and gdb. But you'll have to build both of them

Re: bash "Couldn't Allocate Heap" error - info.

2006-03-06 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Jonathan Arnold wrote: Antony Baxter wrote: Hello, This afternoon, for the first time, I began experiencing the C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't allocate heap ... child_copy: stack write copy failed,... errors that have been reported on this list before. I am getting th

Re: bash "Couldn't Allocate Heap" error - info.

2006-03-06 Thread Jonathan Arnold
Antony Baxter wrote: Hello, This afternoon, for the first time, I began experiencing the C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't allocate heap ... child_copy: stack write copy failed,... errors that have been reported on this list before. I am getting these errors on every '#!

RE: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread skaller
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 18:40 +, Dave Korn wrote: > This is utter fantasy. Floating point hardware either conforms to IEEE754, > which specifies the exact algorithms to be used in different rounding modes, > or it is broken. .. as Intel found out :)) -- John Skaller Async PL, Realtime sof

Re: Cron jobs in cygwin implementation in windows

2006-03-06 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Suresh Kumar wrote: > Dear Igor: > > I am a database architect and using cygwin (win implementation) to do > some scripting. > > I am aware that cron is an excellent scheduler and would like to get > my hands on this resource. Can u please walk me thru of how I can go > abo

RE: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Korn
On 06 March 2006 17:36, Phil Betts wrote: [ This is *still* nothing to do with cygwin. It's a newlib issue. I have set the Reply-To to take this thread to the talk list and removed the other lists and Jim and Roberto from the Cc line. ] > I'm absolutely amazed that you are a professor of comp

RE: seg fault in cygwin1.dll during gdb session

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Korn
On 06 March 2006 17:25, Shmuel Vagner wrote: > HI, > I am using a SlickEdit IDE to compile and debug my projects. > When debugging a new operator gdb reports a segmentation fault. > I found this problem in the archives and the proposed solution is to > ignore the fault and continue debugging. > Un

RE: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Phil Betts
Roberto Bagnara wrote on Monday, March 06, 2006 9:30 AM:: > > what is and what is not noise depends on the application. > In our applications we systematically use controlled rounding on IEEE > 754 floating point numbers. In the end, what we obtain (in memory) > are definite (i.e., provably corre

seg fault in cygwin1.dll during gdb session

2006-03-06 Thread Shmuel Vagner
HI, I am using a SlickEdit IDE to compile and debug my projects. When debugging a new operator gdb reports a segmentation fault. I found this problem in the archives and the proposed solution is to ignore the fault and continue debugging. Unfortunately this is possible with gdb or ddd but not with

bash "Couldn't Allocate Heap" error - info.

2006-03-06 Thread Antony Baxter
Hello, This afternoon, for the first time, I began experiencing the C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't allocate heap ... child_copy: stack write copy failed,... errors that have been reported on this list before. I am getting these errors on every '#! /bin/bash' script, tho

Can we get a new release of binutils?

2006-03-06 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
Can we get a new release of binutils? Thanks. See: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-02/msg00758.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ:

Re: setup.exe: feature request with patch

2006-03-06 Thread Igor Peshansky
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Dr. F. Lee wrote: Hi All, I deploy cygwin using unattended (http://unattended.sf.net/) and wpkg (http://www.wpkg.org/). It's useful for me to be able to specify additional packages to be installed on the command line. The attached file is a patch to provide this: call "setup

Re: gcc-g++ can not find included files

2006-03-06 Thread Agnes Bousquier
Dave Korn a écrit : On 06 March 2006 15:09, Agnes Bousquier wrote: Hello, I am trying to compile the C++ program included. Unfortunately, when I type : "g++ -o avcodec_sample avcodec_sample.cpp -lavformat -lavcodec -lz", gcc outputs many errors telling that it can not find many functions

RE: gcc-g++ can not find included files

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Korn
On 06 March 2006 15:09, Agnes Bousquier wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to compile the C++ program included. Unfortunately, when I > type : > "g++ -o avcodec_sample avcodec_sample.cpp -lavformat -lavcodec -lz", gcc > outputs many errors telling that it can not find many functions and > variable

setup.exe: feature request with patch

2006-03-06 Thread Dr. F. Lee
Hi All, I deploy cygwin using unattended (http://unattended.sf.net/) and wpkg (http://www.wpkg.org/). It's useful for me to be able to specify additional packages to be installed on the command line. The attached file is a patch to provide this: call "setup -p package1,package2,package3,...,p

gcc-g++ can not find included files

2006-03-06 Thread Agnes Bousquier
Hello, I am trying to compile the C++ program included. Unfortunately, when I type : "g++ -o avcodec_sample avcodec_sample.cpp -lavformat -lavcodec -lz", gcc outputs many errors telling that it can not find many functions and variables, after telling : avcodec_sample.cpp:20:21: avcodec.h : N

RE: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Korn
[ X-Posted and Followups set to newlib list; this is almost certainly not a cygwin specific issue. To recap:- ] On 03 March 2006 21:44, Roberto Bagnara wrote: > Hi there, > > the following little program > > #include > > int main() { >double d; >scanf("%lf", &d); >printf("%.10

RE: ls.exe hangs on inaccessible directory if ntsec is turned off

2006-03-06 Thread Dave Korn
On 03 March 2006 20:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I've applied a fix. Please test. > WJFFM. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Do

Re: TTYfier

2006-03-06 Thread Egor Duda
Barry B wrote: > Does anyone still have the source code to a Cygwin > program called "ttyfier"? TTYfier is supposed to > allow the running of Windows console applications that > don't know how to converse with a tty. This would > allow one to run such programs via the sshd that comes > with Cygwi

RE: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Alessio Massaro
x <= 70.905684341886080801486968994140625 DOES imply x <= 70.90568434188608080148696899414 AND vice-versa! Even in 64 bits IEEE 754 the representations of the 2 numbers are identical. Anything beyond the 34th decimal digit is made up by the printf implementation, i.e. it' sn

Re: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Roberto Bagnara
Jim Easton wrote: Dear Mr. Bagnara, Roberto Bagnara wrote: ... does this on Linux/i686 $ a.out 70.9 70.905684341886080801486968994140625 and does the following under Cygwin on the same machine: ... $ ./a.exe 70.9 70.90568434188608080148696899414 Why? Is there a wa

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libggiwmh2-0.3.1-1, libggiwmh2-devel-0.3.1-1, libggiwmh2-display-x-0.3.1-1 and libggiwmh2-samples-0.3.1-1

2006-03-06 Thread Peter Ekberg
A new version of 'libggiwmh' is available for download. It is an upstreams bugfix release, but also includes a packaging fix to enable debugging. - Cleanup properly on failure in ggiWmhInit - buildsystem: libtool update / fixes New packages: libggiwmh2-0.3.1-1 libggiwmh2-devel-0.

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libggimisc2-2.2.1-1, libggimisc2-devel-2.2.1-1 and libggimisc2-samples-2.2.1-1

2006-03-06 Thread Peter Ekberg
A new version of 'libggimisc' is available for download. It is an upstreams bugfix release, but also includes a packaging fix to enable debugging. - Cleanup properly on failure in ggiMiscInit - pseudo-stubs: kill leftover (debugging) printf - buildsystem: libtool update / fixes New packages:

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libggi2-2.2.1-1, libggi2-devel-2.2.1-1, libggi2-display-aa-2.2.1-1, libggi2-display-file-2.2.1-1, libggi2-display-terminfo-2.2.1-1, libggi2-display-x-2.2.1-1 and libggi2-sample

2006-03-06 Thread Peter Ekberg
A new version of 'libggi' is available for download. It is an upstreams bugfix release, but also includes a packaging fix to enable debugging. - Update doc/README.directx to help MinGW users configure properly - display-fbdev(7): correct path in config-file. The mach64 fbdev accelerator-sublib l

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libgii1-1.0.1-1, libgii1-devel-1.0.1-1 and libgii1-input-x-1.0.1-1

2006-03-06 Thread Peter Ekberg
A new version of 'libgii' is available for download. It is an upstreams bugfix release, but also includes a packaging fix to enable debugging. - Look at GII_DEBUGSYNC instead of GGI_DEBUGSYNC - Update doc/README.directx to help MinGW users configure properly - input-mouse: ignore undefined bit in

Re: Precision of doubles and stdio

2006-03-06 Thread Jim Easton
Dear Mr. Bagnara, Roberto Bagnara wrote: ... > does this on Linux/i686 > > $ a.out > 70.9 > 70.905684341886080801486968994140625 > > and does the following under Cygwin on the same machine: ... > $ ./a.exe > 70.9 > 70.90568434188608080148696899414 > > Why? Is there a w