> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I'm one of the maintainers of the Cygwin DLL ... [and]
> about 25 ported
> > software packages.
> > Creating a distribution ... is clearly the job for somebody else.
>
> OK Corinna is very busy.
>
All people involved are very busy.
> Jorg Schaible wrote:
> > Wi
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 09:49:29PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>David Christensen wrote:
>
>> If we can build a fully automated Cygwin "stable" test suite and
>> parallelize it across many computers (wishful thinking: SETI screen
>> saver), it may be possible to do 100% testing of all changes prior
David Christensen wrote:
> If we can build a fully automated Cygwin "stable" test suite and
> parallelize it across many computers (wishful thinking: SETI screen
> saver), it may be possible to do 100% testing of all changes prior to
> release -- major, minor, and updates.
Fortunately for all the
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 12:09:24AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, David Christensen wrote:
>
>> Thank you all for your comments. I have tried to respond to each person
>> who replied, but may have omitted those where their topic is already
>> covered below.
>> [snip]
>>
>> Da
On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 12:03:42AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Works just fine for me.
>
>(WJJFM?)
Try again: WJFFM.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, David Christensen wrote:
> Thank you all for your comments. I have tried to respond to each person
> who replied, but may have omitted those where their topic is already
> covered below.
> [snip]
>
> Dave Korn wrote:
> > http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR
>
> Is there a
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 10:51:38PM -0700, Ben Wing wrote:
>Try this, latest Cygwin, Win2k latest:
>
>/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2049% cat > foo
>foo [hit ^D]
>/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2050% od -bc foo
>000 146 157 157 015 012
> f o o \r \n
>005
>/xemacs/cygbuild/b
Try this, latest Cygwin, Win2k latest:
/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2049% cat > foo
foo [hit ^D]
/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2050% od -bc foo
000 146 157 157 015 012
f o o \r \n
005
/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2051% cp foo bar
/xemacs/cygbuild/build-mule/src 2052
Thank you all for your comments. I have tried to respond to each person
who replied, but may have omitted those where their topic is already
covered below.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm one of the maintainers of the Cygwin DLL ... [and] about 25
> ported software packages.
> Creating a distrib
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > No, test development should be done by people not involved with the
> > development of the software under test, or you have a
> conflict of interest.
>
> Not entirely true. There's "whitebox" testing -- where
> knowledge of internals is used to craft the test; t
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
No, test development should be done by people not involved with the
development of the software under test, or you have a conflict of interest.
Not entirely true. There's "whitebox" testing -- where knowledge of
internals is used to craft the test; this is often done by
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:03:02PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>David Christensen wrote:
>>This wish was inspired by my positive experiences with Debian "stable"
>>-- e.g. feature frozen, unit and integration tested, with updates
>>limited to bug and security fixes.
>>
>>Please note that Debian is
you wrote:
> What happens if you cp between two hard drives, or across the
> network? Same
> crazy slowness?
>
> --
> Gary R. Van Sickle
How about 'tar --diff' and '--update' - tried them?
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems--72-->
** mailing list preference; p
you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on :
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:19:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 06:08:48PM +0100, Hughes, Bill wrote:
>>> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> ..snip..
> If you have cygwin programs available to you, then
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Ben Wing wrote:
> >
> > Somehow or other, sscanf() has gotten messed up in recent Cygwin
> > installations.
>
> I believe this probably belongs on the newlib list, since Cygwin uses
> newlib for libc.
CGF already forwarded this report there.
> That said
David Christensen wrote:
> This wish was inspired by my positive experiences with Debian "stable"
> -- e.g. feature frozen, unit and integration tested, with updates
> limited to bug and security fixes.
>
> Please note that Debian is a volunteer effort:
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/jo
That is simultaneously so sweet and so wrong.
I wonder which Device Class that one falls under ;-).
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:36 AM
> To: Gary R. Van Sickle
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Thank you all for your replies thus far. I suspected that my
> posting would generate traffic. :-)
>
>
> > I would especially like to request that there be a "stable"
> distribution.
>
> This wish was inspired by my positive experiences with Debian "stable"
> -- e.g.
> On Oct 1 05:08, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > 1. Roll up your sleeves, get to work, and let the list know when
> > you're done. "The maintainers" (yes, I'm looking at you
> Chris) will
> > at best see this as a threat to their little fifedom, and the only
> > "help" you'll get will be in t
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >
> >>> Well, yes. The flash drive is a Sandisk Cruzer Mini which is USB
> >>> 2.0 with fallback to 1.1. The computer is a Dell Dimension 4600
> >>> which claims eight USB 2.0 connectiors.
> >>> Running Windows XP.
splint is available via setup also.
www.splint.org
Maarten Boekhold wrote:
Hi all,
I have a program that segfaults, and it's quite obvious that this is
caused due to some memory corruption. Except it segfaults at a place
where, if running it in gdb, there shouldn't be a problem. There seems
to b
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:03:09AM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
>
There is no reason to include the email address in your messages. That
just adds spam fodder to the archives.
>>p.s. I hereby volunteer my time to work on implementing my request.
>
>I'm still waiting to hear from somebody "in
Pango has been updated
NEWS
Cygwin: Use GLib 2.4.5, latest gettext, libiconv & binutils releases.
General: This is a stable release providing new functionality as
compared to Pango-1.4, while maintaining source and binary
compatibility. Notable improvements in Pango since
ATK has been updated to version 1.8.0
NEWS
Regular update to the latest upstream release.
DESCRIPTION
===
The ATK library provides a set of interfaces for accessibility. By
supporting the ATK interfaces, an application or toolkit can be used
with such tools as screen readers, magni
There's a package called Memory Watcher/memwatch designed for cygwin which
I've used.
I can't find a URL but this is from the README and a web search should find
it ...
Memory Watcher
==
This is a little library for tracing memory related api calls on cygwin
using gcc.
Features:
- d
I have updated GLib, the low-level core library that forms the basis for
projects such as GTK+ and GNOME to version 2.4.6.
DESCRIPTION
===
The GLib library provides data structure handling for C, portability
wrappers, and interfaces for such runtime functionality as an event
loop, threads
Hi all,
I have a program that segfaults, and it's quite obvious that this is
caused due to some memory corruption. Except it segfaults at a place
where, if running it in gdb, there shouldn't be a problem. There seems
to be some memory corruption somewhere, and I can't figure out where.
I tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thank you all for your replies thus far. I suspected that my posting
would generate traffic. :-)
> I would especially like to request that there be a "stable"
distribution.
This wish was inspired by my positive experiences with Debian "stable"
-- e.g. feature frozen, unit a
28 matches
Mail list logo
