you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on :
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:19:39PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 06:08:48PM +0100, Hughes, Bill wrote:
>>> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>>>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> ..snip..
>>>>> If you have cygwin programs available to you, then use the mount
>>>>> command. If the only output from the mount command is of the
>>>>> "noumount" variety then cygwin isn't installed in any meaningful
>>>>> way.
>>>>
>>>> Personally I would consider the existence or non-existence of
>>>> cygwin1.dll to be a more definitive measure of whether or not
>>>> Cygwin is installed in a "meaningful" way.
>>> I think it may be possible to cygwin installed and not have it in
>>> the path, if it's started from a bat or cmd that modifies the path
>>> etc...
>>> anyway, finding cygwin1.dll may be a slow process. It might be
>>> better to access the registry, this jscript uses the windows
>>> scripting host, so won't work on older boxes unless wsh is there,
>>> but as a proof of concept it may be ok.
>>
>> Just having "mount.exe" and "cygwin1.dll" in the same directory and
>> running "mount" should be adequate.
>>
>> If "mount" exits with a "multiple cygwin problem" then, well...
>>
>> If "mount" shows more than just /cygdrive paths, then cygwin
> isn't installed
> ^
> nothing
>> in any useful way.
i.e. the output of "mount -m" would be empty.
Or does a default cygdrive prefix show up there?
/Hannu E K Nevalainen, B.Sc. EE Microcomputer systems --72-->
** mailing list preference; please keep replies on list **
-- printf("LocalTime: UTC+%02d\n",(DST)? 2:1); --
--END OF MESSAGE--
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
