Re: getopt_long behavior

Christopher Faylor wrote: He didn't say "cygwin kernel". He said "cygwin suite", as in suite of programs. If someone wants a cygwin distribution which uses non-posix options, they will have to recompile and rebuild the whole cygwin release. Yes, you are correct. I thought the original poster

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:19:23AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: >>>I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of >>>the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in >>>arbirtary ord

Re: getopt_long behavior

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do grep "string" *.c and

Re: cd'ing to /

Virginia Mann wrote: I don't know whether this is a cygwin question or just a pure unix question. I don't know as much as I should about either one yet. My "/" is mounted at C:\cygwin, which is sensible. The FAQ warns us that making / point at C:\ is a bad idea. Unfortunately, when I type "

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:39:20 -0500 Christopher Faylor wrote: > No, it wouldn't suggest that at all. Did you try the grep that I > suggested? getopt isn't exported from cygwin1.dll. It only lives in > libcygwin.a. > I don't know why the original designers of cygwin decided to do things > this w

Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe

William A. Hoffman wrote: There is a complete tcl that can be found here: ftp://ftp.nanotech.wisc.edu/pub/khan/tcl/tcltk-8.3.4-cygwin/ It would be great if this was used. It is a complete tcl that works under cygwin. But that tk is X-based, isn't it? There is no way that the default cygwin

cd'ing to /

I don't know whether this is a cygwin question or just a pure unix question. I don't know as much as I should about either one yet. My "/" is mounted at C:\cygwin, which is sensible. The FAQ warns us that making / point at C:\ is a bad idea. Unfortunately, when I type "cd" with no modifiers or

Re: Fw: ezmlm response

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:36:00PM -0500, Doug & Melissa Auxier wrote: > >Hello list moderator. Your program is not working properly, for this is >my only email address. It would not unsubscribe me because I'm not on the >list? >Yet I messages at this address. >Please help. For your edificati

Fw: ezmlm response

Hello list moderator. Your program is not working properly, for this is my only email address. It would not unsubscribe me because I'm not on the list? Yet I messages at this address. Please help. Thanks, Doug - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:44:52AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >This does not invalidate the proposal "do something at link time to force >POSIXLY_CORRECT if necessary for this app". I don't understand what it has to do with anything. Your proposed change (which I've already made) will still work.

Re: getopt_long behavior

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:34:47AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> And for an answer to the riddle of why this won't immediately do >>> what you want, try this in the winsup/cygwin directory: >>> >>> grep -i getopt cygwin.din >>> >>> (Remembe

Re: Fall back from Windows to cygwin PIDs

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:29:22AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: >2003-01-29 Brian Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * win32-nat.c (cygwin_pid): Removed as unused. > (child_attach): Try fall back to Cygwin pid. I've applied the patch. Thanks. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 01:34:47AM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:45:06PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >>> would you accept a patch making getopt respond to a >>> "POSIXLY_INCORRECT_GETOPT" envvar? >> >> I'll make the change but it won't have the eff

Re: getopt_long behavior

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:45:06PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >> would you accept a patch making getopt respond to a >> "POSIXLY_INCORRECT_GETOPT" envvar? > > I'll make the change but it won't have the effect you think it will. > I guarantee it. I will even make a snapsh

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:42:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Giving the impression that ordering of arguments is not significant >is not a good idea in general. Although what you're looking for is >an extreme, the fact that you can generally interchange the order >of flags ( grep -i -c *.

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:45:06PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >would you accept a patch making getopt respond to a >"POSIXLY_INCORRECT_GETOPT" envvar? I'll make the change but it won't have the effect you think it will. I guarantee it. I will even make a snapshot and then you can watch in horror a

Re: getopt_long behavior

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: >I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of >the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in >arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do >grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the

RE: su command ?

> > I have just tried this on Windows XP as Administrator. I tried to su to > > a normal user but got: > > > > su: cannot run /bin/bash: Permission denied > Try chmod 644 /bin/bash. You probably installed Cygwin for "Just Obviously this is stupid as it would make it unexecutable... Permissions on

RE: su command ?

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Chris January wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:54:23AM -, Chris January wrote: > > > > > > > > 'su' is not implemented in cygwin (yet). The closest you can > > > > > get now is setting up sshd and using 'ssh user@localhost'. > > > > > There was some talk of one of th

RE: su command ?

> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:54:23AM -, Chris January wrote: > > > > > > 'su' is not implemented in cygwin (yet). The closest you > can get now is > > > > setting up sshd and using 'ssh user@localhost'. There was > some talk of > > > > one of the new packages having that functionality, but yo

Re: ViewCVS problems

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:46:39PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Because rebase isn't part of setup yet. That and we're just plain mean. Wow. It's been a while. cgf >Original Message: >- >From: Marcus Lindblom [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:41:56 +0100 >To: [EM

Re: getopt_long behavior

Chris Morgan wrote: > I've never used a flavor of linux that didn't support > arguments and options in arbitrary(within reason) order. I > think if you started forcing users to enter options in a > strict order you would be met with considerable resistance as > this restriction is unnecessary. I'

Re: progress on libstdc++.dll

Paul Kienzle wrote > I have been advised from a couple of sources that the dlltool approach to > building libstdc++.dll will not work. So I then tried the following: > > gcc -shared -Wl,-whole-archive,--export-all-symbols,--enable-auto-image- base \ > /usr/lib/libstdc++.a -Wl,-no-whole-archive

RE: getopt_long behavior

I've never used a flavor of linux that didn't support arguments and options in arbitrary(within reason) order. I think if you started forcing users to enter options in a strict order you would be met with considerable resistance as this restriction is unnecessary. I'm not asking for every tool to

RE: ViewCVS problems

Because rebase isn't part of setup yet. Larry Original Message: - From: Marcus Lindblom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 23:41:56 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: ViewCVS problems From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Rolling

Re: getopt_long behavior

Chris Morgan wrote: > I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of > the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in > arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do > grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the end). Is > there anyway to get around

RE: getopt_long behavior

Giving the impression that ordering of arguments is not significant is not a good idea in general. Although what you're looking for is an extreme, the fact that you can generally interchange the order of flags ( grep -i -c *.c vs grep -c -i *.c) does generate expectations for all tools. This u

RE: ViewCVS problems

From: Elfyn McBratney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Rolling back cygwin didn't help, but rolling back Python did! > > (From 2.2.2-4 to 2.2.2-1) > > That sounds like it's the culprit. If you rebase your python > dll's that > should fix-up. Did you read the release announcment? > >

Re: Suppress newline under cygwin bash

Randall R Schulz wrote: > > This is csh / tcsh's way of suppressing the terminal newline usually > supplied by the "echo" command. It also documented in the man page to > work with the separate echo executable, "/bin/echo.exe", but it does > not do so for me (for whatever reason). The man page i

progress on libstdc++.dll

Hi, I'm trying to make GNU Octave work well under cygwin. One issue is the size of the loadable modules, which are huge because they are statically linked to libstdc++.a I've been working on a libstdc++.dll instead. Has someone already done this? My first approach was to use dlltool: dlltool

getopt_long behavior

I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the end). Is there anyway to get around this without recompiling the

scp problem

Hello, I can't seem to find anything about this anywhere, but that may be due to my inexperience with mailing lists. So here goes: I am trying to scp some files off a SCO OSR5 machine onto my Win98 PC using the scp command that comes with cygwin. I can connect fine and the file transfer starts

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:41:27PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >>> Max Bowsher wrote: >>> I got this from gdb: (gdb) bt #0 0x77f767ce in ?? () i.e. nothing useful. If anyone has any su

Re: Making zsh the default

In the last episode (Jan 29), Igor Pechtchanski said: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: > > Now all that's needed is a way to let us not install bash... Why > > does setup.exe insist on selecting the bash package? I have to > > remember to cycle it back to "Skip" every time. > > Not a ver

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >> Max Bowsher wrote: >> >>> I got this from gdb: >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 0x77f767ce in ?? () >>> >>> i.e. nothing useful. If anyone has any suggestions for getting more >>> info, please say. >> >> I posted a scri

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

Max Bowsher wrote: > That's odd. I can't find them in the archives. Do you want to re-send them > to > Actually the last change I submitted at Roberts request was against HEAD (at the time) and can be found at: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q3/msg00110/ViewChng I had to redo it

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >Max Bowsher wrote: > >>I got this from gdb: >>(gdb) bt >>#0 0x77f767ce in ?? () >> >>i.e. nothing useful. If anyone has any suggestions for getting more info, >>please say. > >I posted a script to this list some time back that can be us

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

Max Bowsher wrote: I got this from gdb: (gdb) bt #0 0x77f767ce in ?? () i.e. nothing useful. If anyone has any suggestions for getting more info, please say. I posted a script to this list some time back that can be used to translate NT addresses (like the 0x77f767ce above) to function names.

Re: bug: select() for sockets returned by accept() returns always ready for write (sel.always_ready 1)

I have now tested with the latest snapshot (2003-Jan-28) and now it seems to work OK. Thanks. - Risto > From: Corinna Vinschen > Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:33:59 +0100 > > Thanks for the report. It looks pretty much as if you're right here. > I've set the returned file descriptor to connected

Re: ViewCVS problems

> > That sounds like it's the culprit. If you rebase your python dll's > > that should fix-up. > > Marcus must rebase *all* DLLs not just the Python ones. > > Jason Again with my big foot :( Sorry! Regards, Elfyn McBratney [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.exposure.org.uk -- Unsubscribe info: http

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: I *thought* so too until I tried :) I ran setup, set "All" to Install and was kinda surprised (but pleasently so) when I saw the "keep"s remain "keep"s and the "skip"s become "install"s Note that I didn't say he should click all the way to reinstall :) Setup versi

Re: ViewCVS problems

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 05:43:24PM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > Rolling back cygwin didn't help, but rolling back Python did! (From > > 2.2.2-4 to 2.2.2-1) > > That sounds like it's the culprit. If you rebase your python dll's > that should fix-up. Marcus must rebase *all* DLLs not just the

Re: ViewCVS problems

> Rolling back cygwin didn't help, but rolling back Python did! > (From 2.2.2-4 to 2.2.2-1) That sounds like it's the culprit. If you rebase your python dll's that should fix-up. Did you read the release announcment? Regards,

RE: ViewCVS problems

> > Since it's thrown on os.fork(), I suspect cygwin is the culprit, but > > that's just my gut feeling. > > There have been some changes in the fork-semantics (?) AFAIKS > in the latest > snapshots. Also what heppens if you roll back to cygwin-1.3.18-1? I didn't know about the possibility of ro

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

Brian Keener wrote: > Weiqi Gao wrote: >> The list in the "Full" view is quite long now. I'm just wondering >> if it >> is possible to create another view called "Skipped" and show all the >> > I actually submitted a patch for a view to do just this as well as > one for just those installed back i

Re: Making zsh the default

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: > Virginia Mann wrote: > > Larry Hall kindly advised: > >> Assuming you start bash now by clicking on the icon for cygwin.bat, > >> simply > >> edit that file, and replace "bash" with "zsh". You'll need to review the > >> man page for zsh to see what are the

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

Weiqi Gao wrote: > The list in the "Full" view is quite long now. I'm just wondering if it > is possible to create another view called "Skipped" and show all the > I actually submitted a patch for a view to do just this as well as one for just those installed back in July 02. Not sure what ever

Re: Save typing /cygdrive/c?

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > > Don't want to disappoint people, but I found at least one info page that > > is not properly displayed by pinfo, namely, the cvs info page. To > > reproduce, "pinfo cvs" and follow the "Index" link. Then search for > > "cvsrc". The link "~/

Re: ViewCVS problems

> >> File "/usr/local/viewcvs-0.9.2/lib/popen.py", line 33, in popen > >> pid = os.fork() > >> OSError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable > >> -- > >> > >> Since it's thrown on os.fork(), I suspect cygwin is the culprit, but > >> that's just my gut feeling. > > > >There have been so

RE: sh/rm bug -- rm doesn't remove a file when run from cmd

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Harald Kierer wrote: > > Found the problem: I had a file named `rm': > > > > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l rm > > -rw-r--r--1 layerNone0 Jan 28 15:47 rm > > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>getfacl rm > > # file: rm > > # owner: layer > > # group: None > > user::rw- > > gro

Re: Save typing /cygdrive/c?

> Don't want to disappoint people, but I found at least one info page that > is not properly displayed by pinfo, namely, the cvs info page. To > reproduce, "pinfo cvs" and follow the "Index" link. Then search for > "cvsrc". The link "~/.cvsrc" does not appear as a link in pinfo (but does > in in

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

Lapo Luchini wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > >> I was running the rsync testsuite, and an rsync process hung. >> I did "strace -p ", and got 1 line of trace: >>4 4 [sig] rsync 2540 wait_sig: looping >> >> Does this mean anything to any Cygwin gurus? >> > What release are you using exactly?

Re: ViewCVS problems

Christopher Faylor writes: > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:59:43PM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >> File "/usr/local/viewcvs-0.9.2/lib/popen.py", line 33, in popen > >> pid = os.fork() > >> OSError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable > >> -- > >> > >> Since it's thrown on os.fork(),

Re: Making zsh the default

Virginia Mann wrote: Larry Hall kindly advised: Assuming you start bash now by clicking on the icon for cygwin.bat, simply edit that file, and replace "bash" with "zsh". You'll need to review the man page for zsh to see what are the appropriate flags to pass to get a login shell. I don't ha

RE: Segmentation fault running JvCreateJavaVM possile bug ?

Sorry, I don't have time to try this (I don't use gcj) but have you looked here: http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/dll.html It's hard for me to tell by the information you've given but I do see some differences between what you're doing (in process) and that which is described in this guide. Pe

Re: ViewCVS problems

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:59:43PM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> File "/usr/local/viewcvs-0.9.2/lib/popen.py", line 33, in popen >> pid = os.fork() >> OSError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable >> -- >> >> Since it's thrown on os.fork(), I suspect cygwin is the culprit, but >> th

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Weiqi Gao wrote: > > > I'm one of those who fires up the setup.exe program everyday and > > > download whatever that's updated since yesterday. > > > > > > I find myself goin

Re: ViewCVS problems

> File "/usr/local/viewcvs-0.9.2/lib/popen.py", line 33, in popen > pid = os.fork() > OSError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable > -- > > Since it's thrown on os.fork(), I suspect cygwin is the culprit, but > that's just my gut feeling. There have been some changes in the fork-sema

ViewCVS problems

Hi! After a regular update session a few weeks ago, ViewCVS stopped working. I noticed this only later and thus do not know exactly what was changed. I've searched on the ViewCVS and Cygwin websites/maillists and Google about this and found nothing helpful. I also posted to the ViewCVS-mailling

Re: su command ?

> I have just tried this on Windows XP as Administrator. I tried to su to > a normal user but got: > > su: cannot run /bin/bash: Permission denied > When you installed cygwin did you install it for "All Users" or "Just Me"? If the latter you need to run-through set-up, no need to re-install just r

RE: sh/rm bug -- rm doesn't remove a file when run from cmd

> Found the problem: I had a file named `rm': > > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>ls -l rm > -rw-r--r--1 layerNone0 Jan 28 15:47 rm > D:\acl62\src\cl\src>getfacl rm > # file: rm > # owner: layer > # group: None > user::rw- > group::r-- > other:r-- > mask:rwx > > D:\acl62\src\cl\src> > >

Re: su command ?

On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 01:54:23AM -, Chris January wrote: > > > > 'su' is not implemented in cygwin (yet). The closest you can get now is > > > setting up sshd and using 'ssh user@localhost'. There was some talk of > > > one of the new packages having that functionality, but you'd > > have

Re: Fall back from Windows to cygwin PIDs

I haven't gotten any response from gdb-patches yet, so I thought I would ping the cygwin list too. I think this is a valuable addition since it adds functionality that most UNIX users expect without changing current behavior. I also saw a posting (gdb or cygwin, I can't remember which) that said

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Weiqi Gao wrote: > > I'm one of those who fires up the setup.exe program everyday and > > download whatever that's updated since yesterday. > > > > I find myself going to the "Full" view and scroll from top to bottom > > lo

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

Lapo Luchini wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: [...] For more infos: http://www.mail-archive.com/rsync@lists.samba.org/ Ops! I didn't notice it was you I was answering to... of course you know that ML fairly well, as you post in it daily ;-) -- Lapo 'Raist' Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys

Re: cygwin path problems

Igor, At 07:05 2003-01-29, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Randall, On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Igor, Soren, > > ... > > >Seriously, though, you could use something like > > "`/bin/ls /cdv/D/goodies/babe*.jpg | cygpath -w -f -`" > >as the argument. This should expand all the fi

Re: rsync hang - strace output - any ideas?

Max Bowsher wrote: I was running the rsync testsuite, and an rsync process hung. I did "strace -p ", and got 1 line of trace: 4 4 [sig] rsync 2540 wait_sig: looping Does this mean anything to any Cygwin gurus? What release are you using exactly? In 2.5.5-2 I added a small patch (don't

Re: Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Weiqi Gao wrote: > I'm one of those who fires up the setup.exe program everyday and > download whatever that's updated since yesterday. > > I find myself going to the "Full" view and scroll from top to bottom > looking for packages marked "skip" and click on it to make setup

Setup feature request: adding a "Skipped" view

I'm one of those who fires up the setup.exe program everyday and download whatever that's updated since yesterday. I find myself going to the "Full" view and scroll from top to bottom looking for packages marked "skip" and click on it to make setup download the package. The list in the "Full"

Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe

Chuck, On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:54:19PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: > /usr/lib/libtcl8.3.a -> libcygtcl83.a > > I forgot to mention, I created the libtcl8.3.a file as a symlink; The above will no longer be necessary for Python 2.3. Plus, the "cyg" prefixes has been re

Re: cygwin path problems

Randall, On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote: > Igor, Soren, > > At 16:36 2003-01-28, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > >On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Soren A wrote: > > > > > ... > > > > > > Or re-invent that wheel, your choice ;-) > > > Soren A > > > >Why, one doesn't have to be a "cygpath" guru at a

Re: tclsh83.exe should be cygtclsh83.exe

> > >As far as the libraries for tcl, I dunno. That's a decision made by the tcl/tk folks >over on the insight list. For the record, I have these in my /usr/lib dir: >/usr/lib/libcygitcl32.a >/usr/lib/libcygtcl83.a >/usr/lib/libtcl8.3.a <<<-- >/usr/lib/libcygitclstub32.a >/usr/lib/

Re: Bug in gdb (memory leak?)

Just a follow-up on my own mail (more info) The same problem occurs when I "next" over another Xerces-C DOMImplementationLS method - DOMImplementationLS::parse(). I've attached strace to the process as soon as I could, but I couldn't get there before it relinquished some of my CPU. Note, though,

Segmentation fault running JvCreateJavaVM possile bug ?

Hello everybody! I`m trying to make a dll out of a set of java packages . Working with gcc on cygwin win2k. I`m doing this because I need to make a COM out of them. Anyways I get this segmentation fault running JvCreateJavaVM so I made the example down below (a simple c program) to localize the p

Re: running brite with cygwin

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am new to cygwin newsgroup. > I am trying to install BRITE (www.cs.bu.edu/brite) topology generation > in windows using cygwin toolkit. > has anyone here tried that before and been successful? > i have jdk 1.4 installed. i am also able to install cy