On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 07:41:27PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote: >>> Max Bowsher wrote: >>> >>>> I got this from gdb: >>>> (gdb) bt >>>> #0 0x77f767ce in ?? () >>>> >>>> i.e. nothing useful. If anyone has any suggestions for getting more >>>> info, please say. >>> >>> I posted a script to this list some time back that can be used to >>> translate NT addresses (like the 0x77f767ce above) to function >>> names. This can be >>> a help in understanding what a thread is hanging on. >> >> The newly released version of gdb may do this automatically. I >> accidentally included a patch from the net in this version which >> added this functionality. I meant to remove it because it was rumored >> to have problems but it seems >> to be working ok, AFAICT. > >Yes, it's working fine for me. Unless it really messes up, can you leave it >in?
There is a newer, better patch coming. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
