On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:29:47PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: >I orginally posted this message some time ago. Having all of >the cygwin tools lacking the ability to accept arguments in >arbirtary order makes it more difficult to use them(I often do >grep "string" *.c and then rerun with -i at the end). Is >there anyway to get around this without recompiling the whole >cygwin suite from source code?
No. >On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 04:52:01AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >wrote: >>I noticed that getopt() and getopt_long() aren't doing reordering of >>argv entries. Searching the cygwin-developers mailing list I found >>that this is due to compiling with POSIXLY_CORRECT set. Is there any >>plan to move back to not setting this variable? > >No. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
