> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug in setup.exe 2.194.2.24
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:31:02AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Mess
The following excerpt is from Brian Livingston's 'Windows Manager'
column, 18Mar2002:
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/03/18/020318oplivingston.xml
I'm wondering if, in addition to possibly forbidding the use of VNC,
this might also forbid installing Cygwin on WinXP and then using a
r
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:46:38PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>>Yes, I could write the individuals mentioned in the source, but Corinna
>>dictated that we should keep our dialogues here. In deference to her,
>>I'm posting here...
>
>I appreciate this too.
And, see also: http://cygwin.com/bugs.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Troy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 3:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: The Server Daemon
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> So, I'm trying to get started with implementing the honoring
> of the suid bit by cygwin. I've downlo
Theres a bug in the cinstall directory which I will be resolving
shortly. For now, you can ignore that directories failure.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.htm
Hi,
I'm tryong to compile cygwin for the first time and am getting the
following errors on my system. I was hoping someone could explain the
conflict here and why my system is failing when every other one in the
world works.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/cygwin/obj/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/b
The source code I put here:
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/vcd-src/
to help you guys get compliant with the GPL is going away in 48 hours.
I can't keep that much stuff up there indefinitely...
--Chuck
Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>cygwin-1.1.8
>cygwin-1.3.6
>zl
Christopher Faylor wrote on Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:38 PM:
> ... You might also want to invest in
> something like Norton Systemworks which has diagnostic tools that may
> help narrow down what's wrong with your system.
Hmm. Recently we had an NT system which was frequently BSOD'ing
(not Cy
Hi,
Our names are Larry & Dawn Froncek and I would like to
share a genuine, NO RISK opportunity with you.
Skeptical already? Good!
Unlike other internet opportunities that you might have seen,
what I have to share with you invites close scrutiny
even with a skeptical eye.It is first and
George,
What I see is that both pages instruct the user to do a "cvs login" and
that's to be expected, since that part of CVS.
You don't need to use the Cygwin port of CVS to retrieve file from the
cygwin.com CVS server. You can use a Windows native CVS command line or
something like WinCVS o
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 08:40:52AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:14 AM
>
>> (*) has anybody ported GnuPG to cygwin? Would you mind supporting it
>> and adding it to the cygwin dist?
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 4:14 AM
> (*) has anybody ported GnuPG to cygwin? Would you mind supporting it
> and adding it to the cygwin dist?
If someone has ported it to mingw, that would be even better
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:51:36PM -0400, George Hester wrote:
>Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
>nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
>I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
>before its
Charles,
I found your message on cygwin ( http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/ )
but could not reply there. I followed your advisor and made my
enscript worked!!!
I added one line on my cshrc.csh
setenv PRINTER RW-PRT-02\\HP5SI-2
and use the default /etc/enscript.cfg
The only trouble I have is th
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 17:39:15 -0400 Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ROTFLMAO
>
> George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
> four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
> found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently,
Charles Wilson wrote:
> ROTFLMAO
>
> George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
> four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
> found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
> account is paranoid about ".README"
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = cygwin Digest 20 Apr 2002 21:36:41 - Issue 1886
Scanning Time = 04/20/2002 17:38:31
Engine/
The TechMail Anti-Virus Scanner found a potentially dangerous file
(bootstrap.bat) sent from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file was discovered attached to an email message addressed to you with a
subject of "cygwin Digest 20 Apr 2002 21:36:41 - Issue 1886".
The attachment has b
ROTFLMAO
George Hester was the one who wanted all this stuff -- and I just got
four (count 'em, FOUR) "Message not delivered, virus/sensitive content
found" bounce messages from HIS account. Apparently, George's email
account is paranoid about ".README" files .zip files, in addition to
p
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s) or
blocked a file matching the blocking rules.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server
Scanning Time = 04/20/2002
The TechMail Anti-Virus Scanner found a potentially dangerous file
(bootstrap.bat) sent from Charles Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
The file was discovered attached to an email message addressed to you with a
subject of "Re: I am not going to let cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server".
The attachmen
George Hester wrote:
> The information I have garnered here has helped to maybe stick my toes in
> the fire again. I will wait a while and see if there is any good soul that
> can explain the procedures for a manual setup. And if that is pie in the sky
> then at that point I will decide if walk
At 01:42 PM 4/20/2002, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> > BTW, did it occur to anyone that the rapid and multiple responses to
> > this email -- which, given its tone and lack of specific content
> > qualifies as a troll by any objective measure -- serve to ENCOURAGE this
> > sort of insistent,
At 04:23 AM 4/20/2002, Bryan Siever wrote:
>Greetings,
> I had posted earlier about some undefined references to InitCommonControls.
>I seem to be having a problem trying to link with the comctl32 library, I
>link to it but it still can't find it. I realize that this isn't directly
>relate
At 06:35 PM 4/19/2002, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
>Hi,
>
>while looking for the new Xfree86 packages in my
>local package directory (in my case D:\cyg-install),
>
>I see that packages are saved in a curious directory
>since March 22th.
>
>Its name is :
>D:\cyg-install\ftp%3a%2f%2fmirrors.rcn.net%2fm
At 02:02 PM 4/20/2002, George Hester wrote:
>Thanks Robert. I went there. But it looks as though I have to have Cygwin
>installed to do this. Let me give you an example:
>
>On this page:
>
>http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
>
>you will see an example how to get files using CVS. That
At 01:51 PM 4/20/2002, George Hester wrote:
>Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
>nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
>I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
>before its destruction. You
Michael A Chase wrote:
> I'm having trouble understanding how setup.exe became the source of all
> evil in the universe. You had one BSOD months ago which may or may not
> have been caused by setup.exe and as a result you are unwilling to try
> another version of it ever again.
>
> A client le
Thanks Robert. I went there. But it looks as though I have to have Cygwin
installed to do this. Let me give you an example:
On this page:
http://www.iol.ie/~locka/mozilla/plugin.htm
you will see an example how to get files using CVS. That worked just fine
for me.
But on this page:
http://
Sort of. Maybe it does work for 99% of the people out there. I know
nothing of that. And yes, my toes are sensitive to things such as this. If
I lose my op sys it takes me months to get it back to the condition I had
before its destruction. You may not believe me but I assure you that is the
> BTW, did it occur to anyone that the rapid and multiple responses to
> this email -- which, given its tone and lack of specific content
> qualifies as a troll by any objective measure -- serve to ENCOURAGE this
> sort of insistent, badgering, and rude behavior?
>
> I mean, geez -- it worked,
Hi All,
So, I'm trying to get started with implementing the honoring of the suid
bit by cygwin. I've downloaded the source and performed a build (which
failed - the tail of make.log is below). So, I jumped into the source
directory and looked at what was there. I started with the cygserver*
file
IMHO, cygwin setup works like a champ. I've install cygwin on 4
machiness in the past year, nary a BSOD.
Stick your toes back in. The water was never that bad in the first
place.
;-)
David
On Sat, 2002-04-20 at 12:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, Ge
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Heribert Dahms wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> if it's that important for your company's project
> (that you work like me 50% of each 25h day 8-)
> why don't you pay Red Hat per hour or day,
> so Corinna or Chris work for you in their prime time?
Hi Heribert,
Yes, that's a re
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 03:19:40AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
>Do you have all your toes?
Sure. My toes are not so sensitive that they become burned off if
I encounter a problem with my system.
I'm also the kind of guy who thinks that if something is working for 99%
of the people out there and
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 02:51:45 -0400 George Hester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize that at one time setup.exe might not have been all that it was
> thought to be. And that now it may be better. But once burned many
> people
> do not jump back in the flames. Well I decided I would stick my
> > I assume that one possible reason is that the copy-on-write fork may be
> > somehow bypassing normal in-memory sharing of text segments but I never
> > knew for sure.
> >
>
> Have either of you tried this comparison on XP, to see if it's any
different
> there? I'm running XP here, if Chris J.
Eduado wrote:
> I am running the bash shell, and somehow, even though the SHELL variable is
> set, Oine does not pick it up.
Although bash sets the SHELL variable, it does not export it. This has been
discussed on this list before. The correct solution is to explicitly export
it yourself from /e
> > In the cygwin-apps I have seen some messages
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00340.html about a
> killall
> > util, which was going to be part of the cygutils packages but was waiting
> > because of licensing problems.
> >
> > For killall I'm using a good working script
http://cygwin.com/cvs.html
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Do you have all your toes?
--
George Hester
_
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 02:51:45AM -0400, George Hester wrote:
> >Suggestion. Let's consider a Manual Install Dir
> -Original Message-
> From: George Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: I am not going to let Cygwin BSOD my Windows 2000 Server
Consider this: A BSOD is equivalent to a unix kernel panic - usermode
software shou
42 matches
Mail list logo
