> > I assume that one possible reason is that the copy-on-write fork may be > > somehow bypassing normal in-memory sharing of text segments but I never > > knew for sure. > > > > Have either of you tried this comparison on XP, to see if it's any different > there? I'm running XP here, if Chris J. wants to put the c-o-w DLL up somewhere > so I can download it and try it. Please do - I would be interested to see how it runs on XP - you can download a static library containing just fork() here: http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ccj00/atomice.net/show.cgi?article=1019312635446.68 4814058244
Regards Chris -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
