I'm trying to compile mpeg2enc from the mjpegtools package. The package as a whole
builds successfully with seemingly no problems. I'm also using ppmtoy4m.exe and
mplex.exe from the package: these work fine.
mpeg2enc.exe works fine on the build machine (Win98SE with 64MB), but bombs out with a
"Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> # Why should this...:
> rm //a/bunch/of/files/out/on/a/super/slow/server/*
> # ...block this:
> gcc hello.c
>
> Obviously you're never going to be able to take advatage of all
> non-dependencies, but as a wise man once told me, "you can't win if
I installed Cygwin on 3 different machines today running NT4, XP Home and
Win2000 Server respectively. The problem was reproduced on all.
Tomorrow I will install Cygwin on a brand new machine running XP Professional
(The only other software that has ever been installed on that is Office97).
Tonig
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>>Not really. All the below reference says is that this is intentional, not why it's
>being done. My question was why.
>
> If you follow the later posts as I mention below, you might find the answers.
Don't have the time.
> If you're really interested i
> Gary,
>
> You labelled yourself a patriot.
I quoted the label of a beer bottle. Samuel Adams to be precise.
> I just pointed out some relevant wisdom.
Indeed. But not the relevant wisdom you thought you had.
> If you perceive that to be namecalling, so be it. It's the sort of baseless
> co
> The issue at hand though, is twofold:
> 1) Minimise the changes needed to make a proxy for a program. I.e.
> imagine if GCC and cc1plus.exe lived in-process. That would remove 2Mb
> of disk IO for each compile. However the _only_ chance of getting such a
> program proxied would be a minimalistic
> I would certainly agree with you about that, but the fact remains, a lot
> of code, that cygwin exists to ease the porting of, uses it. If the work
> was done on fork itself, it would help speed-up a lot more that just
> configure (or similar) scripts.
>
> Stephano Mariani
The thing is, a lot o
> Sir,
>
> We await your improved model for process control and the operating system
> that implements it.
>
Senor,
Well wait no longer! These days, by gosh, we got everything from spawns to
execs to named synchronization objects to... dare I say it?... yes, even
threads! Gone are the days whe
At 09:31 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:23:35PM -0800, Dan Browning wrote:
> >At 06:09 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >>At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >>>At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
> At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At 09:11 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 05:52:18PM -0800, Dan Browning wrote:
> >The "c:\cygwin\usr\lib\w32api" DOES actually exist in windows, but I could
> >not access that directory within the cygwin shell:
> >
> >$ cd /usr/lib/w32api
> >bash: cd: /usr/lib/w32api: No su
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:23:35PM -0800, Dan Browning wrote:
>At 06:09 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>>At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
> >Thanks f
> From: Dan Browning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
> > >
> > >The "c:\cygwin\usr\lib\w32api" DOES actually exist in
> windows, but I
> > could not access that directory within the cygwin shell:
> > >
> > >$ c
At 06:09 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
>> >At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>> >>At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
>> >> >Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
>
At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
>At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
>> >Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
>> >Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
>> >start from s
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 05:52:18PM -0800, Dan Browning wrote:
>The "c:\cygwin\usr\lib\w32api" DOES actually exist in windows, but I could
>not access that directory within the cygwin shell:
>
>$ cd /usr/lib/w32api
>bash: cd: /usr/lib/w32api: No such file or directory
>
>However, if I copy "c:\cyg
At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
> >At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >>At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
> >> >Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
> >> >Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c
Just to get a little more off-topic...
> Don't forget this:
>
> "... this is the best of all possible worlds."
> -- Voltaire
Maybe this was a joke, but you *do* realize that this was taken from
a work of fiction? (_Candide_, which was a satire of Gottfried Wilhelm
Leibnitz' philosophy.) Leibn
At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
> >Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
> >Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
> >start from scratch.
> >
> >However, even after re-installing
At 08:13 PM 3/20/2002, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
>
>>The short answer is "the answer is in the email archives".
>
>
>Not really. All the below reference says is that this is intentional, not why it's
>being done. My question was why.
If you follow the later pos
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:15:43AM +0100, Oliver Nittka wrote:
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016672925 23930 206.184.204.2 (21 Mar 2002 01:08:45 GMT)
>X-Comp
At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
>Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
>Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
>start from scratch.
>
>However, even after re-installing Cygwin, I still have the same problem as I
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016672925 23930 206.184.204.2 (21 Mar 2002 01:08:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 01:0
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
> The short answer is "the answer is in the email archives".
Not really. All the below reference says is that this is intentional,
not why it's being done. My question was why.
> See:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg01018.html
>
> Th
This is strange! Why did this happen? I posted it but Oliver Nittka is
listed as the poster. Then the odd mail headers and to the wrong
subject. Hmmm... Mysterious...
Oliver Nittka wrote:
> Organization: Salira Optical Networks
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0
Hi
I have a problem with make (2.79.1) and latest cygwin1.dll (Win 2000 SP2):
I have a makefile that looks like this:
OUTPUT=C:\cygwin\TesteGNU\TesteGNU.exe
OBJS=main.o
C:\cygwin\TesteGNU\TesteGNU.exe: $(OBJS)
C:\cygwin\bin\ld.exe -Bstatic -T C:\cygwin\lib\ldscripts\i386pe.xn \
-o $@ \
C
Yes, you didn't use the prescribed method to install it.
http://cygwin.com/setup.exe
Earnie.
"C. Han" wrote:
>
> Sorry to bother you but I thought maybe you could help me with this
>
> I got gcc package 2.95.3-5 and whenever i try to compile something it
> gives me a error of cannot find -lu
I reported a similar error with Windows98 a few days ago; same general
scenerio in that it starts fine until the Downloading part and then
throws an exception. I sent along the CPU dump that Win98 provides.
Elizabeth
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reportin
No, as Chris pointed out, setup is fine. Check your environment again. You
have some environment variable set wrong (for some other reason) or you're not
using the gcc you think you are or some other such thing. Of course if you
still get the complaint about a bad volume when you run cygcheck
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
start from scratch.
However, even after re-installing Cygwin, I still have the same problem as I
described previously... ld can't find -luser32. Could t
There is a new FAQ entry about GNU Emacs and Cygwin, addressing the
common questions. In addition, it tells you where to find
cygwin-mount.el, by Klaus Berndl. This bit of elisp makes Emacs aware
of your Cygwin mount table.
David
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-sim
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:28:46PM -0800, Luke J Crook wrote:
>>> From: "Edward M. Lee"
>>> To: "'Jeremy Hetzler'"
>>> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:42:38 -0500
>
>>> Try removing the ./ from the w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2 package, then
>>> reinstall.
>
>>> Or just tar -C / path/to/w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2
Check out the FAQ like David mentioned.
Keep things the way you have them if that's your preference but don't expect
help from the list when you run into troubles. Cygwin won't work with two or
more copies of it's DLL on the same system so unless you're adventurous (or
masochistic), you'll w
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:23:44PM -, Trash wrote:
>
>Your message :-
> "Re: OT: possible project/research project" on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:46:59 -0500
>has been trashed.
>
>All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from being received by
>any e-mail addresses at this site - please take
I do have Ruby installed, and there is a copy of cygwin1.dll in the c:\ruby
directory.
-Luke
- Original Message -
From: "David Starks-Browning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luke J Crook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: ./config -l
The encryption and decryption has to be done inside a shell script, so I
can't use vi -x filename. Is there any other way ?
Thanks
you culd use vi -x file name
then it asks you for a key
next time you view the file you have to enter the crypth key
>Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run
>> From: "Edward M. Lee"
>> To: "'Jeremy Hetzler'"
>> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:42:38 -0500
>> Try removing the ./ from the w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2 package, then
>> reinstall.
>> Or just tar -C / path/to/w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2
I don't understand. I'm having the same problem, and I installed Cyg
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:02:34 +0900, "Dylan Cuthbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hmm.. I noticed some talk on a mailing list somewhere about problems with
>locales... could it be to do with input streams trying to look up locale
>info and getting null ptrs as a result?
>
>I'll try compiling libst
Ouch. Get rid of the old cygwin1.dll. This is in the FAQ.
On Wednesday 20 Mar 02, Luke J Crook writes:
> And lastly...
>
> **
> 751k 2002/02/25 C:\cygwin\bin\cygwin1.dll - os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0
> "cygwin1.dll" v0.0 ts=2002/2/25 8:14
>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016658027 8639 206.184.204.2 (20 Mar 2002 21:00:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:00
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016658391 8639 206.184.204.2 (20 Mar 2002 21:06:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:06
At 04:06 PM 3/20/2002, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>Lars Munch wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 04:20:00PM -0700, BERNDT, JON wrote:
>>
>>>I have installed CygWin on numerous machines using teh nice setup program at
>>>cygwin.com. Recently, however, I have installed CygWin on two machines (one
>>>a W2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016657563 8639 206.184.204.2 (20 Mar 2002 20:52:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:52
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016657743 8639 206.184.204.2 (20 Mar 2002 20:55:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:55
Your message :-
"Re: cron usage..." on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:00:31 -0800
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your mailing lists to which I have never
subscribed and put them elsewhere.
--
Un
In the "Known Problems" section of the Cygwin FAQ, it used to read:
- Fixed in the Next Release -
On Win9x, scp and cvs/ssh leave ssh processes running, and cvs/ssh
hangs at completion.
In fact, cvs+ssh no longer leaves ssh processes running, and no longer
hangs at compl
Organization: Salira Optical Networks
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019
Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pavel Tsekov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anonymous ftp
Hopefully someone here will be able to help.
I just installed the latest version of cygwin including the gcc development
tools. But when running ./configure I get the following error
**
...
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo
Hallo Christopher,
Am 2002-03-18 um 21:34 schriebst du:
> When I try to start it, I get an error from the
> Microsoft Management Console:
> "Could not start the cron service on Local Computer.
> The service did not return an error. This could be an
> internal Windows error or an internal servi
Your message :-
"Re: OT: possible project/research project" on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:46:59 -0500
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your spam and numerous mailing list to
which I have never
Lars Munch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 04:20:00PM -0700, BERNDT, JON wrote:
>
>>I have installed CygWin on numerous machines using teh nice setup program at
>>cygwin.com. Recently, however, I have installed CygWin on two machines (one
>>a W2K machine and the other a Win98SE machine) and whe
Do you have C:\Cygwin\Bin in your Windows System Environment Variable
PATH? Have you rebooted since you've put it in your PATH?
Christopher Paulicka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry to bother you, but I am trying to get cron to
> work on my Windows 2000 machine.
>
> I installed cron as instructed he
Robert Mark Bram wrote:
> Howdy all!
>
> Read the documentation.. made my .bashrc script!
>
> Here it is so far:
>
> function ll
> {
>ls -l
> }
>
> function m
> {
>man $1 | less
> }
Why do you insist on piping the output of man to less? It's unnecessary
as man will use whatever is
Lars Munch wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Oleg wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I'm curious, how does everyone start cygwin? I use a shortcut
>>"C:\cygwin\bin\rxvt.exe -sl 200 -fg white -bg black -geometry
>>110x43+0+0 -backspacekey ^H -fn 8x16 -e /bin/bash --login -i", starting in
>>"C:\c
Hello,
I am looking for crypt command in cygwin. It looks like, I have crypt
command , but it does not work like in Sun OS. I want to encrypt a file
using some password. How to do this in cygwin ?.
in Unix, I do this, but the same thing does not work in cygwin.
crypt mypassword < /usr/filename
Hmmm... Why did you email me personally? Keep it on the list! (I thought
I had set up the Followup-To or the Reply-To to handle this).
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 2:38:01 AM, you wrote:
>
> AD> I had set up anonymous ftp before and it was working find (pro
Windows NT 4 is reporting an Application Error when I run Setup.Exe. The
error reads:
The instruction at "0x78001750" referenced memory at "0x20b078e9".
The memory could not be "read".
At first the program runs fine. The splash screen identifies it as
"setup.exe version 2.194.2.15". I
Rick,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:22:52AM -0800, Rick Rankin wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, what's keeping PostgreSQL marked as test?
Nothing but forgetfulness. If my head wasn't attached... :,)
> I was under
> the impression that the primary issue was a problem in the Cygwin 1.3.9 DLL
> that
Randall..
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:47 AM
> To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: possible project/research project
> >No - sounds like you haven't been paying attention. In my very firs
> Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
> some patches being added.
I installed it from scratch every time but the first (of course...) but
\winnt\system32\command.com is definitely there, in Win98 is
widows\command\command.com.. be it an upgrade of a from scratch.
I'm going to have to say that discussion of why your W2K installation does
not command.com is off-topic for this list. Perhaps you can soothe your
curiosity with a discussion off-line. For the record, I have command.com
in my W2K installation and it was a clean install that I did myself.
HTH,
Hi,
Well, this doesn't seem to qualify as on-topic, but we've seen worse here...
I have COMMAND.COM on my Win2K SP2 system, for what it's worth. It was a
"clean" install on a newly formatted drive.
Perhaps it came along with the Windows 2000 Resource Kit, whose software I
also installed?
Ra
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>BTW: regarding that cvs-ssh-win32-cygwin.tar.gz file, IANAL but
>regularly reading the cygwin mailing list I happen to have read that
>distributing binaries without sources technically violates the GPL, as
>the uses isn't gived the rig
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:10:53AM +, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>ntsec on
>
>uid=11024(starksb) gid=10513(Domain Users) groups=0(Everyone),545(Users),10513(Domain
>Users)
>
>ntsec off
>~
>uid=11024(starksb) gid=10513(Domain Users) groups=10513(Domain Users)
>
>When ntsec is
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:37:42AM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
>I would certainly agree with you about that, but the fact remains, a
>lot of code, that cygwin exists to ease the porting of, uses it. If
>the work was done on fork itself, it would help speed-up a lot more
>that just configure (o
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:04:44PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>In fact cgf has had a copy-on-write fork() for cygwin in alpha-quality
>IIRC. I'd love to do some perf tests with that, and in fact on my todo
>list is cygwin profiling. Time however, is the killer.
This keeps coming up. Maybe it s
Stephano,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:47:28PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
> I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k
> over an existing windows version or was it a clean install?
>
> Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
> some patch
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:03:53AM -0500, Rob Gibson wrote:
>DLL version 1.3.10, running on Windows ME. I checked the message boards,
>but did not see this.
>
>Call this code X: {
> alarm(2);
> pause();
> cout << "A";
> alarm(4);
> pause();
> cout << "B";
> alarm(4);
> pause();
>
Just out of curiosity, what's keeping PostgreSQL marked as test? I was under
the impression that the primary issue was a problem in the Cygwin 1.3.9 DLL
that was fixed in 1.3.10.
--Rick
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
Rob,
More...
At 01:33 2002-03-20, Robert Collins wrote:
>Randall,
>responses inline..
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:34 PM
>
> > >Well we still have that basic separate - bash's builtin's
> > for examp
I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k
over an existing windows version or was it a clean install?
Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
some patches being added.
Thanks,
Stephano Mariani
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
/ "Stephano Mariani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three machines,
| win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro).
Can be found on my Win2k Pro SP2, ahh well maybe something depending
on your shoesize or something, definetly nothing for cygwin ;-)
/ "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Hi,
| Yes i do have bash installed.
Where what and how is bash installed??
So what is your definition of 'run it', what do you do to try to run
it, and what happens then??
/Andy
--
The eye of the beholder rests on the beauty!
--
Unsubscribe
Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three machines,
win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro).
Stephano Mariani
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 2:27 PM
> To: Stephano Mariani
> Cc: 'Anthony P Praino';
Hi,
Yes i do have bash installed.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Tsekov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: new cygwin setup, great!
> Hello dave,
>
> Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:1
Stephano,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
> Windows 2000 has no command.com.
Sure it does:
$ ls -l c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
-rwxrwxr-x1 Administ SYSTEM 50620 Jul 26 2000
c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
Whether or not someone would want t
The new (2.194.2.15) setup.exe is not behaving as I would
expect. In brief, it re-downloads the same
packages each time it is run. Details below.
Am I misunderstanding or is this a bug?
Environment:
NT4SP6a with fresh Cygwin install made on 15th March (with
previous setup.exe). This install wa
> > To my great surprise, the close(socket) operation
> > took EXTREMELY long. It
> > took 0.11 second (CPU usage was low), while this
> > operation under MinGW 1.1
> > on the same machine took only 0.00019 second. On
> > another Linux machine,
> > close took 0.43 second.
> >
A solution may be
On Thursday 21 Mar 02, Robert Mark Bram writes:
> I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
> in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
> instructions)?
Since GNU Emacs is not a Cygwin application, such a query is off-topic
for this list.
Hrmmm...
-rw-rw-rw-1 prentis Domain A 5060 Mar 18 19:23 bcs_1.4.tar.bz2
@ bcs
sdesc: "Baseline Configuration System, Internet Services"
category: Base
requires: cygwin bash openssh binutils
version: 1.4
install: latest/bcs/bcs_1.4.tar.bz2 5060
-rwxrwxrwx1 Administ Domain U4889
I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
instructions)?
Thanks!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Robert Mark Bram
Sent: Wednesday, 20
Neil,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:12:42PM -0330, Neil Zanella wrote:
> I have the lastest cygwin with postgresql installed.
> It seems like there is no $PGDATA directory. Anyone
> know how to properly start the postmaster so that
> the psql utility works properly:
>
> psql: could not connect to s
Hi all!
I just visited the archives and cygwin.com and could not get any positive
hit, but this seems like such an important utility. Is it true there is no
emacs for Cygwin?
Thanks!
Rob
:)
:-}
;->
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http
Hi!
Wouln't be convenient to have a NASM package directly installable (ni
binary and in source) from Cygwin's setup.exe?
I would surely be useful for people that uses CygWin, which I think
includes some of NASM developers, judging from the
cvs-ssh-win32-cygwin.tar.gz file in your download page.
Th
> > utilities packaged... who volunteers? 0=)
> I think you just did :}.
Uh, I didn't realize it.. but your experience in dealing with people far
exceedes my own so you must be right.
I'll do it.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN:
> -Original Message-
> From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:01 PM
> To: CygWin
> Subject: Re: RFP: NASM
>
>
> > *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with
> cygwin without a
> > hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure
Howdy...
I've installed cygwin (with all current packages, actually) and now my
XP laptop will not undock. The error is that a process in still using the
COM port, so I presume that there is some process monitoring the COM port
for hard-line telnet sessions or something. Does anyone know wh
> *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
> hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility (cvs.exe,
cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of course withour sources) so
they indeed know of cygw
> package and automatically install the necessary dependencies is run `apt-get
It doesn't work automatically, it needs people creating and updating packages.
And as setup.exe cannot be avoided (dpkg would be a cygwin package itself and
would need an "already installed" system) thereis no big gain
TEST RELEASE. PLEASE test that this new package works as expected and
doesn't break anything. Report eventual problems back to the list.
DESCRIPTION:
Keychain is an OpenSSH key manager, typically run from
~/.bash_profile. When run, it will make sure ssh-agent is running; if
not, it will start s
Hi Randall,
>Here's what I did: I used "od -c" to determine what are the actual
>sequences generated by the keys I cared to map and then wrote
>a .inputrc
>file based on that.
ahh, this was the missing step. I never knew, what key code sequences could
be used to assign a function at the key c
On Tuesday 19 Mar 02, Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > I've made several superstitious changes to /etc/passwd, /etc/group,
> > but the bottom line is I can now login (telnet and ssh) only with
> > ntsec set. If I disable ntsec, I get the usual:
> >
> > System Process - Application Error : The ap
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cygwin install problems
>
>
> The new program (setup.exe vs. 2.194.2.15) looks great, but
> apparently in the process to download file setup
The new program (setup.exe vs. 2.194.2.15) looks great, but apparently in
the process to download file setup.ini, though all motions look successful,
the file is not stored to disk. After downloading the file, the setup.exe
program apparently attempts to open/read the file and the following error
I would certainly agree with you about that, but the fact remains, a lot
of code, that cygwin exists to ease the porting of, uses it. If the work
was done on fork itself, it would help speed-up a lot more that just
configure (or similar) scripts.
Stephano Mariani
> -Original Message-
> F
Randall,
responses inline..
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:34 PM
> >Well we still have that basic separate - bash's builtin's
> for example.
> >If
> >it's not builtin, it needs a sub process.
>
> That's not
Hello dave,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:13:20 AM, you wrote:
d> Hello,
d> I just installed the latest cygwin using the new setup program and from
d> an accessability standpoint it's great, all the graphics and icons have a
d> textual description or the plus signs are signs not bmp files.
d>
Hello Andrew,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 2:38:01 AM, you wrote:
AD> I had set up anonymous ftp before and it was working find (probably
AD> around 1.3.6). Now on 1.3.9 it doesn't seem to be working right. I've
What exactly isn't working ?
[snip]
AD> ftpd : Win32 Process Id = 0x998 : Cygwin P
Robert,
Responses interposed below.
At 22:55 2002-03-19, Robert Collins wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:15 PM
>
> >
> > Robert,
> >
> > This idea isn't really new.
>
>I don't recall claiming it as
98 matches
Mail list logo
