I'm going to have to say that discussion of why your W2K installation does not command.com is off-topic for this list. Perhaps you can soothe your curiosity with a discussion off-line. For the record, I have command.com in my W2K installation and it was a clean install that I did myself.
HTH, Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX At 10:47 AM 3/20/2002, Stephano Mariani wrote: >I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k >over an existing windows version or was it a clean install? > >Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and >some patches being added. > >Thanks, >Stephano Mariani > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Behalf Of Andrew Markebo > > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 3:37 PM > > To: Stephano Mariani > > Cc: 'Jason Tishler'; 'Anthony P Praino'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Cygwin on Win 2000 > > > > / "Stephano Mariani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three >machines, > > | win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro). > > > > Can be found on my Win2k Pro SP2, ahh well maybe something depending > > on your shoesize or something, definetly nothing for cygwin ;-) > > > > /Andy > > > > -- > > The eye of the beholder rests on the beauty! > > > >-- >Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple >Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html >Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html >FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
