There are no test failures on
- FreeBSD 12.0/x86_64
- FreeBSD 12.2/arm64
- FreeBSD 13.0/x86_64, FreeBSD 13.0/arm64
However:
* There is 1 test failure on FreeBSD 13.1/x86_64:
FAIL: tests/head/head-write-error
Same as my earlier report in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/202
On Solaris 11.4, in 64-bit mode, I still get 1 failure:
FAIL: tests/stty/stty-row-col
like already reported in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2023-03/msg00035.html
The log file is attached.
solaris114-test-suite.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
On NetBSD 9.3/x86_64, I see 3 test failures:
FAIL: tests/date/date-debug
FAIL: tests/date/date-tz
FAIL: tests/tail/pipe-f2
On NetBSD 8.0/sparc64, I see these test failures, and additionally:
FAIL: tests/touch/not-owner
This is a subset of what I reported in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/co
On 27/08/2023 11:26, Bruno Haible wrote:
There are no test failures on
- FreeBSD 12.0/x86_64
- FreeBSD 12.2/arm64
- FreeBSD 13.0/x86_64, FreeBSD 13.0/arm64
However:
* There is 1 test failure on FreeBSD 13.1/x86_64:
FAIL: tests/head/head-write-error
Same as my earlier report in
On 27/08/2023 00:28, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Alpine Linux 3.18 (x86), I see two test failures:
FAIL: tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt
FAIL: tests/cp/preserve-mode
The first one is new.
The second one I already reported in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2023-03/msg00034.html
and you anal
On 26/08/2023 21:26, Sam James wrote:
Pádraig Brady writes:
We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the coming week
so any testing you can do on various different systems
between now and then would be most welcome.
This is a stabilization release coming about 18 weeks after the 9.3 release.
On
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
Yes:
$ type sleep
sleep is a shell builtin
> Does the following help (I don't have easy access to an alpine system):
> diff --git a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh b/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
> index 3ffb
On 27/08/2023 17:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
Yes:
$ type sleep
sleep is a shell builtin
Does the following help (I don't have easy access to an alpine system):
diff --git a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh b/
On 2023-08-27 18:16, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 27/08/2023 17:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
Yes:
$ type sleep
sleep is a shell builtin
Does the following help (I don't have easy access to an alpine
system):
dif
On the Hurd, I got weird results during "make check"; see attached
screenshot.
Thus I restarted from a clean Hurd environment, and now the
"make check" run terminated reasonably, with 18 FAILures.
Find attached the log file.
hurd-test-suite.log.gz
Description: application/gzip
On 27/08/2023 17:21, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2023-08-27 18:16, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 27/08/2023 17:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
Yes:
$ type sleep
sleep is a shell builtin
Does the following help (I don't ha
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Perhaps fpurge() is needed on FreeBSD to avoid the repeated warning?
> I don't have easy access to a FreeBSD machine at present,
> to test this change:
>
> diff --git a/src/head.c b/src/head.c
> index 7bba1420c..da32c886f 100644
> --- a/src/head.c
> +++ b/src/head.c
> @@ -18
The build succeeds and all tests pass on the following platforms:
Linux
Guix 1.4
Ubuntu 22.04
Ubuntu 22.04 / 32
Ubuntu 22.04 / x32
Debian 9.1
Debian 11.1
Debian 12 / powerpc64
CentOS 8-stream
CentOS Stream 9
Fedora 28 / riscv64
Fedora Rawhide Cinnamon
OpenSUSE Leap 15.2
M
On 27/08/2023 17:31, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Cygwin 2.9.0/x86_64, I see 8 ERROR and 30 FAIL:
ERROR: tests/tail/inotify-hash-abuse
ERROR: tests/rm/rm-readdir-fail
ERROR: tests/cp/nfs-removal-race
ERROR: tests/df/no-mtab-status
ERROR: tests/df/skip-duplicates
ERROR: tests/du/inodes
ERROR: tests/ls/
> On Cygwin 2.9.0/x86_64, I see 8 ERROR and 30 FAIL:
Whereas on Cygwin 3.4.6/x86_64, I see 8 ERROR and 29 FAIL:
ERROR: tests/tail/inotify-hash-abuse
ERROR: tests/rm/rm-readdir-fail
ERROR: tests/cp/nfs-removal-race
ERROR: tests/df/no-mtab-status
ERROR: tests/df/skip-duplicates
ERROR: tests/du/inod
On 27/08/2023 20:45, Bruno Haible wrote:
On Cygwin 2.9.0/x86_64, I see 8 ERROR and 30 FAIL:
Whereas on Cygwin 3.4.6/x86_64, I see 8 ERROR and 29 FAIL:
ERROR: tests/tail/inotify-hash-abuse
ERROR: tests/rm/rm-readdir-fail
ERROR: tests/cp/nfs-removal-race
ERROR: tests/df/no-mtab-status
ERROR: tes
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The cksum failures are regressions,
> which should be handled by the two attached patches.
After applying these two patches, only the 'FAIL: tests/cksum/b2sum' is gone.
The 'FAIL: tests/cksum/md5sum-bsd' is still there. Find attached the new log
file.
cygwin346-test-suite
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Here is a comparison of the failing tests:
> >
> > === Cygwin 2.9.0 Cygwin 3.4.6 ===
> > FAIL: tests/rm/cycleFAIL: tests/rm/cycle
> > FAIL: tests/chmod/no-x FAIL: tests/chmod/no-x
> > FAIL: tests/
On 27/08/2023 23:11, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
The cksum failures are regressions,
which should be handled by the two attached patches.
After applying these two patches, only the 'FAIL: tests/cksum/b2sum' is gone.
The 'FAIL: tests/cksum/md5sum-bsd' is still there. Find attached
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Weird. I guess the `: > missing\dir` construct causes the script
> to exit early in failure. Perhaps `if touch missing\dir` would work better.
No, that does not make a difference. Both ": > 'missing\dir'" and
"touch 'missing\dir'" succeed when 'missing' is an existing direc
We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the next few days
so any testing you can do on various different systems
between now and then would be most welcome.
This is a stabilization release coming about 18 weeks after the 9.3 release.
Changes since the last pre-release
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/h
Pádraig Brady writes:
> On 26/08/2023 21:26, Sam James wrote:
>> Pádraig Brady writes:
>>
>>> We plan to release coreutils-9.4 in the coming week
>>> so any testing you can do on various different systems
>>> between now and then would be most welcome.
>>> This is a stabilization release comi
22 matches
Mail list logo
