On 27/08/2023 17:21, Dragan Simic wrote:
On 2023-08-27 18:16, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 27/08/2023 17:06, Bruno Haible wrote:
Pádraig Brady wrote:
Perhaps 'sleep' is a shell builtin here which is confusing things?
Yes:
$ type sleep
sleep is a shell builtin
Does the following help (I don't have easy access to an alpine
system):
diff --git a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
b/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
index 3ffb7b0b1..f4f12136a 100755
--- a/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
+++ b/tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt.sh
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ for prg in $built_programs; do
'[' | expr | stty )
continue;;
# Wrap some utilities known by the shell by env.
- echo | false | kill | printf | pwd | test | true )
+ echo | false | kill | printf | pwd | sleep | test | true )
prg="env $prg";;
esac
checkprg $prg
Yes. With this change, the failure disappears.
Cool. Applied (as well as all your other coreutils and gnulib changes).
Perhaps it would be a good idea to release an updated tarball in the
next few days, so we can test again with the latest patches applied,
just to make sure there are no regressions.
Right. I'm planning to do that once these last couple
of patches percolate for a while.
Will reply to the top level of this thread with the new tarball.
cheers,
Pádraig.
