Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:15:51 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an >> ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. >> >> With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in >> ForkJoinPo

Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out [v2]

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:20:55 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: >> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an >> ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. >> >> With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in >> ForkJoinPo

Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:30:44 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: > As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an > ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. > > With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in > ForkJoinPool,

Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out [v2]

> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an > ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. > > With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in > ForkJoinPool, so that would need to be fixed separately. > > Tagging

Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:15:51 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an >> ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. >> >> With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in >> ForkJoinPo

Re: RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out

On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:30:44 GMT, Viktor Klang wrote: > As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an > ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. > > With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in > ForkJoinPool,

RFR: 8269428: java/util/concurrent/ConcurrentHashMap/ToArray.java timed out

As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in ForkJoinPool, so that would need to be fixed separately. Tagging @DougLea as an