On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:15:51 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an >> ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. >> >> With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in >> ForkJoinPool, so that would need to be fixed separately. >> >> Tagging @DougLea as an FYI. :) > > Hello Viktor, Doug, > >> failures due to unrelated FJP and/or GC issues (for which it may be better >> to develop a separate test). > > Since the test has (unintentionally) exposed an issue within the > ForkJoinPool, should we open a separate issue to track that (or do we already > have one)? > @jaikiran I suspect that we might already have a JBS issue which relates to > the FJP bug itself, but I'll have to go find it first. I'll sync with Doug > next week. Thank you - that sounds fine to me. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18023#issuecomment-1983226656
