On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:30:44 GMT, Viktor Klang <vkl...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> As an intermediate fix to the test, switching to explicit usage of an > ExecutorService seems to do the trick to make this test reliably pass. > > With that said, this test (CHM::ToArray.java) seems to trigger an issue in > ForkJoinPool, so that would need to be fixed separately. > > Tagging @DougLea as an FYI. :) Hello Viktor, Doug, > failures due to unrelated FJP and/or GC issues (for which it may be better to > develop a separate test). Since the test has (unintentionally) exposed an issue within the ForkJoinPool, should we open a separate issue to track that (or do we already have one)? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18023#issuecomment-1983186827
