Re: RFR: 8290482: Update JNI Specification of DestroyJavaVM for better alignment with JLS, JVMS, and Java SE API Specifications [v4]

2022-09-21 Thread Robbin Ehn
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 10:37:41 GMT, David Holmes wrote: >> This update is primarily about changes to the JNI Invocation API >> specification, mainly in relation to `DestroyJavaVM`. The motivation for the >> changes is to align with changes being made to the JLS, JVMS and >> `java.lang.Runtime`,

Re: RFR: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:47:18 GMT, Jaikiran Pai wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails on Linux if `/tmp` >> is a symbolic link directory. >> The root cause is that `JarUtils.createJarFile` [1] will throw >> `FileAlreadyExistsException` if `parent` is a

Withdrawn: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:42:37 GMT, Jie Fu wrote: > Hi all, > > runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails on Linux if `/tmp` is > a symbolic link directory. > The root cause is that `JarUtils.createJarFile` [1] will throw > `FileAlreadyExistsException` if `parent` is a symbolic dir

Re: RFR: 8289610: Degrade Thread.stop [v4]

2022-09-21 Thread Joe Darcy
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 08:41:19 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Degrade Thread.stop to throw UOE unconditionally, deprecate ThreadDeath for >> removal, and remove the remaining special handling of ThreadDeath from the >> JDK. >> >> Thread.stop is inherently unsafe and has been deprecated since JDK 1.

Re: Sequenced Collections

2022-09-21 Thread Stuart Marks
Hi, yes, this is the right place to discuss Sequenced Collections. I'm glad you find it promising. Note that Sequenced Collections actually has very little implementation in it, aside from various reversed views of things. The actual data is still stored in existing concrete collections such a

Re: RFR: 8234262: Unmask SIGQUIT in a child process [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread David Holmes
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:37:59 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Clear the signal mask of the child when launching with posix_spawn. >> >> SIGQUIT signals are handled on non-Java Threads by the VM. >> For Java threads the signal mask blocks SIGQUIT. >> The ProcessBuilder uses posix_spawn on all platfor

Re: RFR: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Jie Fu
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:34:03 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote: > Withdraw my approval per Alan's comment. Okay. Thanks @iklam and @AlanBateman . - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10266

Re: RFR: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume

2022-09-21 Thread Serguei Spitsyn
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 16:32:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > Degrade Thread.suspend/resume to throw UOE unconditionally. > > Another step in the removal of this deadlock prone mis-feature from the > user-facing API. Thread.suspend/resume have been deprecated since JDK 1.2 > (1998) and terminally de

Re: RFR: 8234262: Unmask SIGQUIT in a child process [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 21:37:59 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Clear the signal mask of the child when launching with posix_spawn. >> >> SIGQUIT signals are handled on non-Java Threads by the VM. >> For Java threads the signal mask blocks SIGQUIT. >> The ProcessBuilder uses posix_spawn on all platfor

Re: RFR: 8234262: Unmask SIGQUIT in a child process [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Roger Riggs
> Clear the signal mask of the child when launching with posix_spawn. > > SIGQUIT signals are handled on non-Java Threads by the VM. > For Java threads the signal mask blocks SIGQUIT. > The ProcessBuilder uses posix_spawn on all platforms to create new processes. > Without a specific request, th

Re: [BUG]Collections.unmodifiableMap(map).entrySet().iterator().forEachRemaining ismissing null check

2022-09-21 Thread Stuart Marks
Thanks for filing this. This was (some time ago) moved into the main bug database: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292317 s'marks On 8/12/22 7:05 AM, Rob Spoor wrote: I found one similar issue, https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8015008, but that was for an empty primitive iterator. I'v

Re: RFR: 8234262: Unmask SIGQUIT in a child process

2022-09-21 Thread Brian Burkhalter
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 20:30:53 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: > Clear the signal mask of the child when launching with posix_spawn. > > SIGQUIT signals are handled on non-Java Threads by the VM. > For Java threads the signal mask blocks SIGQUIT. > The ProcessBuilder uses posix_spawn on all platforms to

RFR: 8234262: Unmask SIGQUIT in a child process

2022-09-21 Thread Roger Riggs
Clear the signal mask of the child when launching with posix_spawn. SIGQUIT signals are handled on non-Java Threads by the VM. For Java threads the signal mask blocks SIGQUIT. The ProcessBuilder uses posix_spawn on all platforms to create new processes. Without a specific request, the child proc

Re: RFR: JDK-8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present

2022-09-21 Thread Mandy Chung
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:38:50 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: >> We noticed that with certain jar file input, jdeps runs into the following >> exception, this happens with jdk11, 17 and 20. >> >> jdeps.exe --multi-release 11 --module-path . --inverse --package >> com.sap.nw.performance.supa.client

Re: RFR: 8292016: Rework JLI_ReportErrorMessageSys [v13]

2022-09-21 Thread Julian Waters
> Second attempt at resolving > [JDK-8292016](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8292016) with a less > intrusive approach this time > > Side note: While it might be preferred to remove this entirely, other areas > of the JDK also use the same flawed logic, and removing this would simply > p

Integrated: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Sotona
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:08:20 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: > Parsing performance of `j.l.c.MethodTypeDescriptor::ofDescriptor` can be > significantly improved and add performance boost to intensive users. > > Two main reasons have been identified and fixed in this patch: > > First glitch is late ins

Re: RFR: 8289552: Make intrinsic conversions between bit representations of half precision values and floats [v8]

2022-09-21 Thread Jatin Bhateja
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:52:49 GMT, Smita Kamath wrote: >> 8289552: Make intrinsic conversions between bit representations of half >> precision values and floats > > Smita Kamath has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Addressed revie

Re: RFR: 8293613: need to properly handle and hide tmp VTMS transitions [v3]

2022-09-21 Thread Chris Plummer
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 22:41:50 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote: >> src/hotspot/share/runtime/javaThread.cpp line 1174: >> >>> 1172: #if INCLUDE_JVMTI >>> 1173: // Suspending a JavaThread in VTMS transition or disabling VTMS >>> transitions can cause deadlocks. >>> 1174: assert(!is_in_non_tmp_VTMS_

Re: RFR: 8293613: need to properly handle and hide tmp VTMS transitions [v3]

2022-09-21 Thread Chris Plummer
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 22:15:49 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn wrote: >> src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiEnvBase.cpp line 713: >> >>> 711: if (!jt->is_in_tmp_VTMS_transition()) { >>> 712: jvf = check_and_skip_hidden_frames(jt, jvf); >>> 713: } >> >> I think this comment needs some help. It's hard to ma

Re: RFR: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume

2022-09-21 Thread Chris Plummer
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 16:32:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > Degrade Thread.suspend/resume to throw UOE unconditionally. > > Another step in the removal of this deadlock prone mis-feature from the > user-facing API. Thread.suspend/resume have been deprecated since JDK 1.2 > (1998) and terminally de

Re: RFR: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 16:49:32 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: >> Parsing performance of `j.l.c.MethodTypeDescriptor::ofDescriptor` can be >> significantly improved and add performance boost to intensive users. >> >> Two main reasons have been identified and fixed in this patch: >> >> First glitch is la

Re: RFR: 8289797: tools/launcher/I18NArgTest.java fails on Japanese Windows environment [v5]

2022-09-21 Thread Naoto Sato
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:38:36 GMT, KIRIYAMA Takuya wrote: >> I removed a section of via JDK_JAVA_OPTIONS because including main class is >> not allowed in the specification. >> This behavior is added in JDK-8170832, which add JAVA_OPTIONS environment >> variable. At this time, this test is misma

Re: RFR: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Sotona
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 15:09:21 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote: >> `legal` is initially set to false, so leading `/` is also rejected > > Doh! Could you add a comment with the case block, something like? > // Rejects a leading `/`, any "//", and a trailing '/' (by exit from the loop) I've added the comment

Re: RFR: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Sotona
> Parsing performance of `j.l.c.MethodTypeDescriptor::ofDescriptor` can be > significantly improved and add performance boost to intensive users. > > Two main reasons have been identified and fixed in this patch: > > First glitch is late insertion of return type to the first position of > `j.u.

Re: RFR: 8289552: Make intrinsic conversions between bit representations of half precision values and floats [v8]

2022-09-21 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 00:52:49 GMT, Smita Kamath wrote: >> 8289552: Make intrinsic conversions between bit representations of half >> precision values and floats > > Smita Kamath has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Addressed revie

Re: Sequenced Collections

2022-09-21 Thread Ernie Rael
> I don't see why you think a general collection... I thought the Subject would be sufficient to indicate that I was not talking about collections in general. I should have been more precise with my words; guess I was just excited by a bi-directional ordered set. The MRU _example_ is useful;

Re: RFR: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Ioi Lam
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:42:37 GMT, Jie Fu wrote: > Hi all, > > runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails on Linux if `/tmp` is > a symbolic link directory. > The root cause is that `JarUtils.createJarFile` [1] will throw > `FileAlreadyExistsException` if `parent` is a symbolic dir

Re: RFR: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:42:37 GMT, Jie Fu wrote: > Hi all, > > runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails on Linux if `/tmp` is > a symbolic link directory. > The root cause is that `JarUtils.createJarFile` [1] will throw > `FileAlreadyExistsException` if `parent` is a symbolic dir

Re: RFR: 8254711: Add java.security.Provider.getService JFR Event [v3]

2022-09-21 Thread Sean Coffey
> Add a JFR Event for `java.security.Provider.getService(String type, String > algorithm)` calls. Sean Coffey has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Correct Label annontation capitals - Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk

Re: RFR: 8293792: runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails with FileAlreadyExistsException: /tmp

2022-09-21 Thread Ioi Lam
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 09:42:37 GMT, Jie Fu wrote: > Hi all, > > runtime/Dictionary/ProtectionDomainCacheTest.java fails on Linux if `/tmp` is > a symbolic link directory. > The root cause is that `JarUtils.createJarFile` [1] will throw > `FileAlreadyExistsException` if `parent` is a symbolic dir

Re: RFR: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc

2022-09-21 Thread Paul Sandoz
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:38:19 GMT, Adam Sotona wrote: >> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/constant/ConstantUtils.java line 217: >> >>> 215: } >>> 216: case '/' -> { >>> 217: if (!legal) return 0; >> >> I

Re: RFR: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:45:32 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: > Hi, > > @dumasun reported the issue: > > Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: > > > configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk > > > `make run-test CONF=fastdebug > TEST="jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java"` failed: > > > --

Re: RFR: JDK-8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present

2022-09-21 Thread Matthias Baesken
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:26:00 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > We noticed that with certain jar file input, jdeps runs into the following > exception, this happens with jdk11, 17 and 20. > > jdeps.exe --multi-release 11 --module-path . --inverse --package > com.sap.nw.performance.supa.client test

Re: RFR: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume

2022-09-21 Thread Stuart Marks
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 16:32:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > Degrade Thread.suspend/resume to throw UOE unconditionally. > > Another step in the removal of this deadlock prone mis-feature from the > user-facing API. Thread.suspend/resume have been deprecated since JDK 1.2 > (1998) and terminally de

RFR: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
Degrade Thread.suspend/resume to throw UOE unconditionally. Another step in the removal of this deadlock prone mis-feature from the user-facing API. Thread.suspend/resume have been deprecated since JDK 1.2 (1998) and terminally deprecated since Java 14. ThreadGroup.suspend/resume were degraded

Re: RFR: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread Kevin Rushforth
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 08:35:30 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > While this particular issue was closed now, this is perhaps yet another > indication that the "import modules" thing is causing problems, and should be > removed now that it is not used anymore. I created > [JDK-8294095](https://bug

Re: RFR: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access [v11]

2022-09-21 Thread Lance Andersen
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 09:23:31 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > > Assuming we are set with the other changes, did you want to add the > > following paragraph (or similar) at line 58 to make it clear that if the > > Manifest is not found, then the JarEntry attributes will not be available: > > This is

Re: RFR: 8289797: tools/launcher/I18NArgTest.java fails on Japanese Windows environment [v3]

2022-09-21 Thread KIRIYAMA Takuya
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:19:35 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote: >> Extract to a byte array with the appropriate charset and then HexFormat the >> bytearray. >> >> >> var SysPropHexVal = >> HexFormat.of().formatHex(sysPropVal.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_16)); > > Thanks, Roger. You beat me to it 🙂

Re: RFR: 8289797: tools/launcher/I18NArgTest.java fails on Japanese Windows environment [v5]

2022-09-21 Thread KIRIYAMA Takuya
> I removed a section of via JDK_JAVA_OPTIONS because including main class is > not allowed in the specification. > This behavior is added in JDK-8170832, which add JAVA_OPTIONS environment > variable. At this time, this test is mismatch with the specification. > I tried to test and get Passed on

Integrated: JDK-8293659: Improve UnsatisfiedLinkError error message to include dlopen error details

2022-09-21 Thread Matthias Baesken
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 11:54:41 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > When trying to load a x64 lib on macOS aarch64 one got previously this > detailed message before > [JDK-8275703](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8275703): > > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /testing/jco3/macOsx64/libsapjco3.dylib

Re: Sequenced Collections

2022-09-21 Thread John Hendrikx
I don't see why you think a general collection, that is in 99.9% of the cases not used to implement an MRU, should burden every call to #add with a check to see if it isn't exceeding its maximum size or to see if a maximum size has been set. This is much better done by composition, as I don't

Re: RFR: 8293540: [Metrics] Incorrectly detected resource limits with additional cgroup fs mounts [v3]

2022-09-21 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Thu, 15 Sep 2022 08:55:41 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Similar issue to the hotspot change discussed in >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8293472. The Java metrics implementation >> may get the resource limits wrong if there are additional cgroup fs mounts. >> Apparently that's more

Re: RFR: JDK-8293659: Improve UnsatisfiedLinkError error message to include dlopen error details [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Lutz Schmidt
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 07:27:44 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: >> When trying to load a x64 lib on macOS aarch64 one got previously this >> detailed message before >> [JDK-8275703](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8275703): >> >> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /testing/jco3/macOsx64/libsapjco3.

Re: RFR: 8215788: Clarify JarInputStream Manifest access [v11]

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:08:21 GMT, Lance Andersen wrote: > Assuming we are set with the other changes, did you want to add the following > paragraph (or similar) at line 58 to make it clear that if the Manifest is > not found, then the JarEntry attributes will not be available: This is somethin

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:56:27 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Hi @AlanBateman >> >> Debug patch: >> >> >> diff --git a/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java >> b/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java >> index 9cc4b5aea98..33c3e2788ad 100644 >> --- a/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherT

Re: RFR: 8294062: Improve parsing performance of j.l.c.MethodTypeDesc

2022-09-21 Thread Adam Sotona
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 16:54:27 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote: >> Parsing performance of `j.l.c.MethodTypeDescriptor::ofDescriptor` can be >> significantly improved and add performance boost to intensive users. >> >> Two main reasons have been identified and fixed in this patch: >> >> First glitch is la

Re: RFR: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 12:35:58 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> I haven't built a JDK using the `--with-import-modules` to include the >> `javafx.*` modules in quite a while, but my recollection is that yes, that >> did cause the JavaFX modules to be loaded by the platform class loader. The >> follow

Integrated: 8294076: Improve ant detection in idea.sh

2022-09-21 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:45:05 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > The ant detection in bin/idea.sh is very rudimentary. It fails at a modern > aarch64 macOS installation. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 8d1dd6a6 Author:Magnus Ihse Bursie URL: https://git.openjdk.o

Re: RFR: JDK-8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present

2022-09-21 Thread Matthias Baesken
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:26:00 GMT, Matthias Baesken wrote: > We noticed that with certain jar file input, jdeps runs into the following > exception, this happens with jdk11, 17 and 20. > > jdeps.exe --multi-release 11 --module-path . --inverse --package > com.sap.nw.performance.supa.client test

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:42:29 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: > Still failed: > [debug.log](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/files/9614161/debug.log) You are running into module hashes now so I think you'll need some of JDK-8294093. In make/common/Modules.gmk ReadSingleImportMetaData can you add UPGR

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:56:27 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Hi @AlanBateman >> >> Debug patch: >> >> >> diff --git a/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java >> b/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java >> index 9cc4b5aea98..33c3e2788ad 100644 >> --- a/test/jdk/tools/launcher/FXLauncherT

Withdrawn: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:45:32 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: > Hi, > > @dumasun reported the issue: > > Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: > > > configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk > > > `make run-test CONF=fastdebug > TEST="jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java"` failed: > > > --

Re: RFR: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:11:55 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote: >> Hi, >> >> @dumasun reported the issue: >> >> Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: >> >> >> configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk >> >> >> `make run-test CONF=fastdebug >> TEST="jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java"` fa

Re: RFR: 8289610: Degrade Thread.stop [v4]

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:43:50 GMT, David Holmes wrote: > Okay I will defer to your views here. Thanks. Thank you, I'll get the CSR moving again and we'll try to get this done. - PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10230

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:10:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: > but you've set the value to IMPORT_MODULE_DIR and it's not clear what this > means in this test I just want to try the imported javafx modules: --patch-module=javafx.graphics=build/linux-loongarch64-server-fastdebug/images/jdk/jmods/java

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 04:03:35 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: >> Hi, >> >> @dumasun reported the issue: >> >> Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: >> >> >> configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk >> >> >> `make run-test CONF=fastdebug TEST="tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java"` >> failed: >> >>

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Leslie Zhai
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 07:10:07 GMT, Alan Bateman wrote: >> Leslie Zhai has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> 8293910: Try --upgrade-module-path and --patch-module but still failed > > The --patch-module option is used to override

Re: RFR: 8293977: jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java fail with jfx

2022-09-21 Thread dumasun
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 00:45:32 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: > Hi, > > @dumasun reported the issue: > > Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: > > > configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk > > > `make run-test CONF=fastdebug > TEST="jdk/modules/etc/VerifyModuleDelegation.java"` failed: > > > --

Re: RFR: 8293910: tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fail with jfx [v2]

2022-09-21 Thread Alan Bateman
On Sat, 17 Sep 2022 04:03:35 GMT, Leslie Zhai wrote: >> Hi, >> >> @dumasun reported the issue: >> >> Configured with jfx-ls-modular-sdk: >> >> >> configure --with-import-modules=modular-sdk >> >> >> `make run-test CONF=fastdebug TEST="tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java"` >> failed: >> >>