I think probably I just go with ELO, much simpler. I think later we
will want to have handicaps.Even at 9x9 Mogo is all by itself
although I expect other programs to eventually catch up or get close
later.
For the Anchor, I think I will take David suggestion and start with
AnchorMan. The
Le mercredi 13 décembre 2006 05:53, Don Dailey a écrit :
> Does a 1 kyu difference mean I can give you 1 stone if I am better and
> expect to come out about even?
yes, 1 handi is 0.5 komi.
>
> Does this all work out in a transitive way? If a 6 kyu can give a 7
> kyu 1 stone, and the 7 kyu can gi
t; Cc: computer-go
> Subject: Re: [spam probable] [computer-go] Anchor Player
>
>
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> I'm not worried about the ELO situation but you are right.
> When skill is measured by ELO you are talking about the
> probability of winning a game against any given
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 04:48 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > GnuGo is another possibility and has the advantage of being a well
> > known quantity, but Gnugo fails to meet some of the criteria above
> > such as being too deterministic and using heavy resources.
But GnuGo uses a lot of memory, o
Hi Sylvain,
I'm not worried about the ELO situation but you are right. When skill
is measured by ELO you are talking about the probability of winning a
game against any given opponent, we just have to be careful how we
interpret or compare to other board sizes.
If 2 opponents are 50 ELO rating p
> GnuGo is another possibility and has the advantage of being a well
> known quantity, but Gnugo fails to meet some of the criteria above
> such as being too deterministic and using heavy resources.
Hello,
GnuGo at level 0 met almost all requirement I think. Perhaps too
deterministic, but I even
