Wrong assertion: "all stones left on the board when the game ends are
considered alive."
The result has nothing to do with how many "pass". The white is dead when
the game is finished.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:02 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ERRATUM:
>
> Sorry, I made a small mistake in my
Strongly agreed on "its is a social game not a mathematical abstraction". As
well-known, there have been several contentious very important matches which
may even change the direction of Japanese Go history.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I would also
Strongly agreed on "its is a social game not a mathematical
abstraction". As well-known, there have been several contentious very
important matches which may even change the direction of Japanese Go
history.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Magnus Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I would also
This case is simple. You needn't capture and remove the "dead" stone
actually before the game ends. If you think it's alive, you have the right
to "resume" to game after "double pass" to make it alive (e.g. make two
eyes).
But I have to say, there are two many arbitrary "judging" rules in Japanese
