I've updated my test script to include those statistics. Oddly enough,
it ran significantly faster for me this morning. I guess my machine
varies a lot. I've now run drefbot and jrefbot back to back and get the
following numbers:
drefbot: 125.192 seconds
jrefbot: 123.916 seconds
That implies the
Good question. I didn't even notice that. On investigation, I had a bug in my shuffle code. I'm embarrassed to say what I had in there the first time, but
here is the fixed code...
I replaced this Java code:
Collections.shuffle(mvlst);
with this C# code:
for (int i = 0; i <
I would be interested to see if your biased version can pass my eventual
conformance tests. If it can, more power to you, I might use the idea
myself.
- Don
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 09:36 -0200, Mark Boon wrote:
>
> On 24-okt-08, at 21:19, Don Dailey wrote:
>
> > >
> > > \
> > > I'm now runnin
Sihai Zhang wrote:
> Are there some good books for computer Go course? Thanks!
Hi,
I am not aware of a book that would cover modern go-programming
techniques (ie Monte-Carlo).
You'll find plenty of ressources in the Computer-go bibliography:
http://www.citeulike.org/group/5884/library
Maybe
On 24-okt-08, at 21:19, Don Dailey wrote:
\
I'm now running a twogtp test against your ref-bot. After 1,000 games
my bot has a winning percentage of 48.8% (+/- 1.6) according to
twogtp.
That is well within 2 standard deviations so I don't think there is a
problem. In fact it is within 1 sta
On Oct 25, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It rarely plays anything other that E5, was E6 a fluke?The other
numbers look correct to me.
I haven't posted the Vala version yet, but I bet it would be even
easier
to port from it, since Vala is heavily based on C#. I
