This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
archer pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 34bde7b80a qemu/armv7a: register cfi flash
add b1bd1b292e arch/armv7-r: fix irq.h for PROTECTED mode
add f195
anchao merged PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apach
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950693151
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ s
nuttxpr commented on PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#issuecomment-2650709774
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR description meets the NuttX requirements.
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#discussion_r1950782741
##
arch/risc-v/src/common/riscv_backtrace.c:
##
@@ -150,17 +163,10 @@ int up_backtrace(struct tcb_s *tcb, void **buffer, int
size, int skip)
{
if (
JianyuWang0623 commented on issue #2991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/issues/2991#issuecomment-2650910731
CC @Donny9 @yangsong8-ai
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
fdcavalcanti opened a new pull request, #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815
## Summary
This PR adds support for backtrace on RISC-V on certain build settings
explained below.
Up to this point, it was not printing anything useful during crashes.
## Impact
acassis commented on code in PR #15812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15812#discussion_r1950859784
##
drivers/mtd/w25qxxxjv.c:
##
@@ -976,10 +976,10 @@ static int w25qxxxjv_erase_sector(FAR struct
w25qxxxjv_dev_s *priv,
}
status = w25qxxxjv_read_status(pri
nuttxpr commented on PR #15812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15812#issuecomment-2650481790
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, al
yf13 commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2650593697
Jus curious will the existing document on rpproxy and rpserver needs be
updated?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
acassis commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2651362490
@OceanfromXiaomi please explain the pros and cons of this approach. Seems
like now it will be limited to a single pollfds notification. It could work
fine for simple applications, but for
linguini1 commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2651400337
Can you provide more description of how you tested?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
raiden00pl commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2651434804
@acassis this change moves `cd_fds` to `struct can_reader_s` which is
allocated dynamically in `init_can_reader()` after each `open()`. So the number
of poll waiters is not limited.
TimJTi commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2651459716
I have a board with CAN, and use polling although with just one poll waiter.
I will try and find time to do a quick works/doesn't work check tomorrow if
that's of help?
--
This is an au
fdcavalcanti commented on code in PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#discussion_r1951225283
##
arch/risc-v/src/common/riscv_exception_common.S:
##
@@ -207,25 +207,46 @@ handle_irq:
.cfi_offset x2, 8 /* Toolchain not support macro, is REG_
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #15789:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15789#issuecomment-2650589585
> @acassis during the 12.8.0 stabilization period there were some conflicts
that made me ask for this change. If we plan to maintain the LTS release we
should make it manageable.
yf13 opened a new pull request, #15813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15813
## Summary
This is the board specific part of armv7-r PROTECTED mode support on QEMU.
It was splitted from pull#15800, which contains more relevant information.
## Impacts
Adding PROT
lupyuen commented on PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#issuecomment-2650751700
@nuttxpr test milkv_duos:nsh
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
fdcavalcanti commented on code in PR #15794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15794#discussion_r1950811666
##
Documentation/contributing/coding_style.rst:
##
@@ -12,6 +12,25 @@ for conformance to the coding style, you should use the
`nxstyle <#nxstyle>`_
tool included
fdcavalcanti commented on code in PR #15794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15794#discussion_r1950811666
##
Documentation/contributing/coding_style.rst:
##
@@ -12,6 +12,25 @@ for conformance to the coding style, you should use the
`nxstyle <#nxstyle>`_
tool included
fdcavalcanti commented on code in PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#discussion_r1950818774
##
arch/risc-v/src/common/riscv_backtrace.c:
##
@@ -150,17 +163,10 @@ int up_backtrace(struct tcb_s *tcb, void **buffer, int
size, int skip)
{
if (up_
fdcavalcanti commented on code in PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#discussion_r1950818774
##
arch/risc-v/src/common/riscv_backtrace.c:
##
@@ -150,17 +163,10 @@ int up_backtrace(struct tcb_s *tcb, void **buffer, int
size, int skip)
{
if (up_
tmedicci commented on PR #15732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15732#issuecomment-2650775403
> Hi @tmedicci thanks for the merge.
>
> As I am new to NuttX I don't know all the rules, but should I have marked
this new feature as `EXPERIMENTAL`?
>
> I would like to fu
nuttxpr commented on PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#issuecomment-2650783082
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+15779&type=issues)
Build and Test Successful (milkv_duos:nsh)
https://gitlab.co
acassis opened a new pull request, #15817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15817
## Summary
Many STM32L4 boards are missing stm32_bringup.c. That confusion
was created when stm32_appinit.c was created. It introduced a new
way to do the board initialization without depen
fdcavalcanti opened a new pull request, #15816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15816
## Summary
This PR modifies ESP32S3 to use WiFi source code from the common layer,
which is already used by ESP32S2.
KConfig prefixes such as `ESP32S3_*` are replaced with `ESPRESSIF
nuttxpr commented on PR #15816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15816#issuecomment-2651832926
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
This PR mostly meets the NuttX requirements but is miss
nuttxpr commented on PR #15817:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15817#issuecomment-2651865282
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements.
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
yf13 commented on PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#issuecomment-2650092626
@anchao now that CI check passed, I am about to do the following clean ups:
- Reduce the scope of this PR to `arch/arm`. and I will guard ARM_THUMB with
PROTECTED as you suggested.
JianyuWang0623 commented on PR #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811#issuecomment-2650176716
@Donny9 Could you review this PR please?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
jerpelea commented on PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793#issuecomment-2650110506
please add in the commit title the area impacted by the commit ex:
arch/arm/max326xx
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950195337
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
JianyuWang0623 opened a new pull request, #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811
## Summary
1. Add support for passive trip point.
Spliting `THERMAL_NORMAL` to `THERMAL_ACTIVE` and `THERMAL_PASSIVE`, to
support different update intervals for thermal zone, mainly fo
lordrasmus commented on PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793#issuecomment-2650113993
ok i added some descriptions
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specifi
lordrasmus commented on PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793#issuecomment-2650126587
like this ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To un
nuttxpr commented on PR #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811#issuecomment-2650116928
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
This PR mostly meets the NuttX requirements, but could
jerpelea commented on PR #15732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15732#issuecomment-2650102724
> > > please split arch and documentation in separate PR if we try to
maintain LTS releases this is a requirement
> >
> >
> > In this case, @jerpelea , It makes sense to keep t
JianyuWang0623 commented on PR #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811#issuecomment-2650129109
> drivers/thermal/dummy: Add another passive cooling device
@jerpelea Done, thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
jerpelea commented on PR #15789:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15789#issuecomment-2650154526
@acassis during the 12.8.0 stabilization period there were some conflicts
that made me ask for this change. If we plan to maintain the LTS release we
should make it manageable. Unless we
jerpelea commented on PR #15732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15732#issuecomment-2650165139
we should discuss on the dev mailing list
I will start a new thread
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
Laczen commented on PR #15732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15732#issuecomment-2650157349
> > > > please split arch and documentation in separate PR if we try to
maintain LTS releases this is a requirement
> > >
> > >
> > > In this case, @jerpelea , It makes sense to
JianyuWang0623 commented on PR #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811#issuecomment-2650320589
> please add a commit message describing why you added the change
Mainly for low-power, as the "Summary" say.
Can save power by reducing times the worker was invoked.
jerpelea commented on PR #15749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15749#issuecomment-2650229232
@fdcavalcanti sorry for not being clear
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
archer pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit ac019bbfa2707c7eeddcd8b3be2294c9a75b5c4e
Author: zhengyu9
AuthorDate: Fri Jul 26 15:38:00 2024 +0800
drivers/mtd: cf
anchao merged PR #15802:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15802
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apach
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
archer pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 405287081d boards/arm Add support to Seeed Xiao nRF52840 Board
new ac019bbfa2 drivers/mtd: cfi-flash driver
n
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
archer pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit ef24233501298d3a349a66a1a2f4a42978851dc7
Author: dongjiuzhu1
AuthorDate: Sat Feb 8 12:11:46 2025 +0800
qemu/armv7-a:
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
anchao commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950387671
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM
yf13 commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950385260
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM_T
anchao commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950396819
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM
simbit18 commented on issue #15807:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15807#issuecomment-2650197438
hi @Justin-Morrison-github it seems related to wrong path
```
apps/examples/hello_rust/Kconfig' not found (in 'source
"/home/morri/InSpace/InSpace-Nuttx/apps/examples/hello
Donny9 commented on code in PR #15811:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15811#discussion_r1950473290
##
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c:
##
@@ -893,8 +896,27 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(FAR struct
thermal_zone_device_s *zdev)
}
}
+ /* Update work
michallenc opened a new pull request, #15812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15812
## Summary
Function `w25qxxxjv_erase` wasn't correctly handling an error in
`w25qxxxjv_erase_sector` call and was returning success even on failure.
Moreover this change does not return `EBUSY`
lordrasmus commented on PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793#issuecomment-2650427103
so i think i heave learned how to contribute to nuttx
will you merge this and close this pull request or should i add the next
driver in this pr ?
--
This is an automated mess
lupyuen commented on PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793#issuecomment-2650442286
This PR will be merged in a while. You can prepare the next driver in a new
PR. Thanks :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
raiden00pl commented on PR #15789:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15789#issuecomment-2651532791
@jerpelea If we don't have the resources to deal with LTS, why do it at all?
making life difficult for (few) contributors is a tragic solution. Another
issue is that some changes must
fdcavalcanti commented on PR #15815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15815#issuecomment-2651507703
I have added a backtrace example output on the PR description.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and us
keever50 commented on PR #15795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#issuecomment-2651584456
hm, i dont think that squashed, or did it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
acassis commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2651600387
Thank @raiden00pl ! I missed that open part, the only thing that was making
me believe it still creating more notifications was:
```
list_for_every(&dev->cd_readers, node)
nuttxpr commented on PR #15813:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15813#issuecomment-2650602509
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
No, this PR description does not fully meet the NuttX r
anchao commented on code in PR #15800:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15800#discussion_r1950700737
##
arch/arm/Kconfig:
##
@@ -982,6 +982,7 @@ config ARCH_ARMV7R
default n
select ARCH_HAVE_CPUINFO
select ARCH_HAVE_PERF_EVENTS
+ select ARM
yf13 opened a new pull request, #15814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15814
## Summary
This fixes a build issue on Ubuntu 22.04 with cmake 3.22.1 for
`qemu-armv7a:rpproxy_ivmshmem`:
```
$ cmake --version
cmake version 3.22.1
$ ninja
[129/1346] Buildi
michallenc commented on code in PR #15812:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15812#discussion_r1950912832
##
drivers/mtd/w25qxxxjv.c:
##
@@ -976,10 +976,10 @@ static int w25qxxxjv_erase_sector(FAR struct
w25qxxxjv_dev_s *priv,
}
status = w25qxxxjv_read_status(
JianyuWang0623 opened a new issue, #2991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/issues/2991
### Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Should we extend "fastboot oem" to support executing custom commands for
test or debug, such as, make ram disk: `fastboot
anchao commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2650950420
> Jus curious if the existing document about `rpproxy_ivshmem` and
`rpserver_ivshmem` needs be updated as well?
Will submit in separate PR, please help approve if there is no any que
LuchianMihai commented on PR #15794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15794#issuecomment-2651205383
> > > > Hi @acassis, On the same page, an paragraph before, talks about
nxstyle, which can be used to do the same thing. Should we move that sentence
to your new heading as well?
cederom commented on issue #2991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/issues/2991#issuecomment-2651101113
I like the idea :-) Should it be build-time selectable / configurable? It
may introduce security issue when commands execution is possible at this point
on production systems? :-)
JianyuWang0623 commented on issue #2991:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/issues/2991#issuecomment-2651113354
> I like the idea :-) Should it be build-time selectable / configurable? It
may introduce security issue when commands execution is possible at this point
on production sys
acassis commented on code in PR #15794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15794#discussion_r1951057934
##
Documentation/contributing/coding_style.rst:
##
@@ -12,6 +12,25 @@ for conformance to the coding style, you should use the
`nxstyle <#nxstyle>`_
tool included unde
acassis commented on PR #15794:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15794#issuecomment-2651157087
> > > Hi @acassis, On the same page, an paragraph before, talks about
nxstyle, which can be used to do the same thing. Should we move that sentence
to your new heading as well?
> >
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
archer pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 225197b779 littlefs/cmake: fix build issue
225197
anchao merged PR #15814:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15814
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apach
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
acassis pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 225197b779 littlefs/cmake: fix build issue
add a4cfd5f9da arch/arm/max326xx: add max32690 irq and peripheral cloc
acassis merged PR #15793:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15793
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apac
acassis commented on PR #15789:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15789#issuecomment-2651180321
@jerpelea @xiaoxiang781216 maybe it is worth to investigate how other
projects that have LTS are solving it. Forcing our (few) contributors to create
a single PR for each modified are see
keever50 commented on PR #15795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#issuecomment-2651625180
I am not sure if i should keep squashing it with force pushing on every
change. Tell me if i am doing something wrong. Learning new things
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
OceanfromXiaomi commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2652511636
> I have a board with CAN, and use polling although with just one poll
waiter. I will try and find time to do a quick works/doesn't work check
tomorrow if that's of help?
H
anchao commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652747461
> > @anchao, thanks. I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu
22.04 with QEMU v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only
qemu-armv8a server side doesn't return ba
anchao commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652745209
> @anchao, thanks. I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu 22.04
with QEMU v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only
qemu-armv8a server side doesn't return back
OceanfromXiaomi commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2652503094
> @OceanfromXiaomi please explain the pros and cons of this approach. Seems
like now it will be limited to a single pollfds notification. It could work
fine for simple application
OceanfromXiaomi commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2652503984
> Can you provide more description of how you tested?
OK
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
OceanfromXiaomi commented on PR #15809:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15809#issuecomment-2652579109
@acassis @linguini1 @raiden00pl @TimJTi
Hi, teachers, please check my latest comments.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
yf13 commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652627278
@anchao, I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu 22.04 with QEMU
v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only qemu-armv8a server
side doesn't return back to nsh.
yf13 commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652628233
@anchao, I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu 22.04 with QEMU
v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only qemu-armv8a server
side doesn't return back to nsh.
anchao commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652648108
> @anchao, I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu 22.04 with
QEMU v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only qemu-armv8a
server side doesn't return back to nsh.
anchao commented on PR #15810:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15810#issuecomment-2652658030
> @anchao, thanks. I tried both qemu-armv7a and qemu-armv8a on Ubuntu 22.04
with QEMU v6.2. rpsock stream block test sessions all complete. only
qemu-armv8a server side doesn't return back
acassis commented on code in PR #15795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#discussion_r1951504067
##
drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x/sx126x.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1008 @@
+/
+ * drivers/wireless/lpw
keever50 commented on code in PR #15795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#discussion_r1951536782
##
drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x/sx126x.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1008 @@
+/
+ * drivers/wireless/lp
keever50 commented on code in PR #15795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15795#discussion_r1951536782
##
drivers/wireless/lpwan/sx126x/sx126x.c:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,1008 @@
+/
+ * drivers/wireless/lp
CV-Bowen commented on PR #15818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15818#issuecomment-2652919887
@anchao @acassis @xiaoxiang781216 @GUIDINGLI Could you help review this PR?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
CV-Bowen opened a new pull request, #15818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15818
## Summary
Author: Bowen Wang
Date: Wed Feb 12 15:51:30 2025 +0800
arm64/qemu-armv8a: optimize the proxy and server configs
rpserver should be the master core, so mod
97 matches
Mail list logo
