xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2275:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2275
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2274:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2274
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new c79bda6 sim inttypes.h: Remove PRI/
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new f307d99 lib_libvsprintf.c: Implemen
yjdwbj opened a new issue #2276:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2276
Hi, guys , I have one Atmel sam4s-xplained-pro board, when I using the nuttx
os find some issues. the built-in
` is used. It is true
that it is called only from start-up code. No other code in STM32 arch is using
it. The only oth
fjpanag commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724571721
So, how do you propose that I can continue?
What is your recommendation on setting the correct FLASH prefetch cycles, in
a safe way?
donghengqaz commented on pull request #2224:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2224#issuecomment-724573471
> Hi @donghengqaz there are some conflicts with esp32_spiflash.c because
recent modifications, please update it and submit again.
Hi @acassis The conflicts are
fjpanag opened a new pull request #2277:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2277
## Summary
Currently the heap regions are hardcoded. The code makes assumptions on how
the memory regions should be mapped, and calculates the boundaries according to
the MCU's available me
yamt commented on a change in pull request #472:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/472#discussion_r520588806
##
File path: include/graphics/nxwidgets/itextbox.hxx
##
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ namespace NXWidgets
* @return position The cursor position.
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #472:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/472#discussion_r520594056
##
File path: include/graphics/nxwidgets/itextbox.hxx
##
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ namespace NXWidgets
* @return position The cursor p
xiaoxiang781216 commented on a change in pull request #472:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/472#discussion_r520594056
##
File path: include/graphics/nxwidgets/itextbox.hxx
##
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ namespace NXWidgets
* @return position The cursor p
davids5 commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520600227
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -135,7 +150,8 @@
#define SPI_CR1_SSI (1 << 8) /* Bit 8: Internal slave
davids5 commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520596645
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -47,6 +47,24 @@
* Pre-processor Definitions
*
v01d commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724744623
> Can you please provide me an example of this, to better understand it?
Choose the MCU that you like, and please explain me how `stm32_clockenable()`
is called from IDLE.
v01d commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724748973
> So, how do you propose that I can continue?
>
> What is your recommendation on setting the correct FLASH prefetch cycles,
in a safe way?
There's not much I c
v01d commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520624418
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
davids5 commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724754058
I question the ROI on this if the voltage SoC in a design is fixed. The one
time setting of the wait states for the MAX Speed will work for the min speed.
The question
v01d commented on a change in pull request #2270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2270#discussion_r520627545
##
File path: arch/arm/src/nrf52/hardware/nrf52_spi.h
##
@@ -153,13 +154,13 @@
#define SPIM_ENABLE_DIS (0)/* Disable SPIM */
#d
v01d commented on a change in pull request #2270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2270#discussion_r520627992
##
File path: arch/arm/src/nrf52/nrf52_spi.c
##
@@ -404,6 +425,71 @@ static int nrf52_spi_isr(int irq, FAR void *context, FAR
void *arg)
}
#endif
yamt opened a new pull request #2278:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2278
## Summary
Build-testing a dirty tree is convenient during development.
## Impact
## Testing
i used this for local build testing
--
yamt commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520634422
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
yamt commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520638346
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
v01d commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520639363
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
hartmannathan commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520641075
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -135,7 +150,8 @@
#define SPI_CR1_SSI (1 << 8) /* Bit 8: Internal
yamt commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520642548
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
v01d commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520647569
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
v01d commented on a change in pull request #:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/#discussion_r520650306
##
File path: arch/arm/src/lpc214x/lpc214x_serial.c
##
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ static int up_attach(struct uart_dev_s *dev);
static void up_detach(struct
fjpanag commented on issue #2001:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2001#issuecomment-724786211
I was thinking... In a typical bare-metal application, usually the
top-of-stack is defined as a linker symbol, since its size its not known. There
things are much simpler, t
hartmannathan commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520679582
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -135,7 +150,8 @@
#define SPI_CR1_SSI (1 << 8) /* Bit 8: Internal
davids5 commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520693487
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -135,7 +150,8 @@
#define SPI_CR1_SSI (1 << 8) /* Bit 8: Internal slave
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724820452
@xiaoxiang781216 Forgive me for the delay. testing today.
This is an automated message from the Apache G
lukegluke commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724823492
@xiaoxiang781216, patch have fixed hardfaults in usb console initiation that
was previously, yes, but I had new hardfault on group_free(group, stream) in
libs/libc/mis
lukegluke edited a comment on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724823492
@xiaoxiang781216, patch have fixed hardfault in usb console initiation that
was previously, yes, but I had new hardfault on group_free(group, stream) in
libs/li
lukegluke edited a comment on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724823492
@xiaoxiang781216, patch have fixed hardfault in usb console initiation that
was previously, yes, but I had new hardfault on group_free(group, stream) in
libs/li
fjpanag commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724833818
Now I am really confused. We are discussing about multiple (and
independent?) issues, I think...
Firstly, this PR only limits the _maximum_ wait cycles that may be
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724838995
Ditto
-
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724845801
@lukegluke and @davids5 sorry, I hit the same issue too and make a fix but
forgot to commit my local change. Please try the update again.
davids5 commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724846581
@fjpanag - Yes the discussion is veering of the subject of the PR. For what
the PR is. It is fine, other then needing a style fix.
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724850683
@xiaoxiang781216
Can not build.
```
nsh_console.c: In function 'nsh_openifnotopen':
nsh_console.c:107:14: error: 'struct console_stdio_s' has no member na
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724850934
@xiaoxiang781216 did you rebase?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
v01d commented on pull request #2177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2177#issuecomment-724851518
Didn't meant to derail discussion, I simply wanted to add some insight into
something that gave me much headache when got into low power modes on STM32L4
and it indeed a ba
lukegluke commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724864080
I've built successfully.
Board starts successfully, dmesg is empty. On reboot
(https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/issues/16133) now no hardfault, but
`PX4_INFO_RA
lukegluke edited a comment on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724864080
I've built successfully.
Board starts ok, dmesg is empty. On reboot
(https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/issues/16133) now no hardfault, but
`PX4_INFO_RAW("
raiden00pl commented on a change in pull request #2270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2270#discussion_r520761468
##
File path: arch/arm/src/nrf52/hardware/nrf52_spi.h
##
@@ -153,13 +154,13 @@
#define SPIM_ENABLE_DIS (0)/* Disable SPIM
raiden00pl commented on a change in pull request #2270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2270#discussion_r520766478
##
File path: arch/arm/src/nrf52/nrf52_spi.c
##
@@ -404,6 +425,71 @@ static int nrf52_spi_isr(int irq, FAR void *context, FAR
void *arg)
}
#
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724879534
@xiaoxiang781216 @lukegluke - What shall are you building with for apps?
This is an automated message fr
hartmannathan commented on a change in pull request #2273:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2273#discussion_r520785381
##
File path: arch/arm/src/stm32/hardware/stm32_spi.h
##
@@ -135,7 +150,8 @@
#define SPI_CR1_SSI (1 << 8) /* Bit 8: Internal
adamfeuer commented on issue #2276:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2276#issuecomment-724891429
Hi,
It looks like the sam4s-xplained-pro can talk with the SD Card to get the
cardinfo structure. So that's working. That seems to be happening in 1 bit
bus mod
davids5 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-724894421
@xiaoxiang781216
Ok I fixed the build issue.
Yes the stream is not initialized. There are no counts on the semaphore.
 were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new cf7b56e Publishing web
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new cf7b56e Publishing web
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2278:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2278
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from c79bda6 sim inttypes.h: Remove PRI/SCN macros for fast and least types
add 5dd5174 testbuild.sh: A
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from c79bda6 sim inttypes.h: Remove PRI/SCN macros for fast and least types
add 5dd5174 testbuild.sh: A
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from c79bda6 sim inttypes.h: Remove PRI/SCN macros for fast and least types
add 5dd5174 testbuild.sh: A
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from c79bda6 sim inttypes.h: Remove PRI/SCN macros for fast and least types
add 5dd5174 testbuild.sh: A
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #2001:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2001#issuecomment-725083104
No, you can't put g_idle_topstack to BSS section, since the startup code
which zero out BSS section will corrupt your running(idle) stack.
Yes, you can define the
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/473
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
xiaoxiang781216 closed issue #2092:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2092
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
btashton commented on issue #2092:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2092#issuecomment-725099732
This should not have been closed quite yet.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new ac5cda8 Fix for file naming is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new ac5cda8 Fix for file naming is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new ac5cda8 Fix for file naming is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new ac5cda8 Fix for file naming is
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new ac5cda8 Fix for file naming is
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2263:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2263#issuecomment-725124045
Ok, my initial attempt is only to addressing the hardfault issue since
stdin/stdout/stderr should always initialize correctly with the right
configuration. But t
yjdwbj commented on issue #2276:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/2276#issuecomment-725125177
Thank you @adamfeuer reply to me, I having a logic analyzer, and connected
to the right PIOD interface.
 were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 3959f75 wireless/wapi: add cha
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #471:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/471
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx-apps.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 937b67b wapi/wireless: add get
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2257
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from 5dd5174 testbuild.sh: Add -C option to skip tree cleanness check
add 95be9ea net/callback: remove
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from 73d5700 net/udp: fix nxstyle warning
add f0bf214 sched: pthread: Fix pthread_join() for SMP
No ne
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2272
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2260:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2260#issuecomment-725138126
@acassis is the patch good to merge now?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servic
masayuki2009 opened a new pull request #2279:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2279
## Summary
- sched_tasklistlock.c was introduced to stabilize NuttX SMP
- However, the current SMP implementation is stable with recent fixes
- So I decided to remove the file
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280
## Summary
Remove accidently in PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2243
## Impact
## Testing
--
xiaoxiang781216 opened a new pull request #79:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/79
## Summary
## Impact
## Testing
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
masayuki2009 commented on pull request #2279:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2279#issuecomment-725237354
@xiaoxiang781216 @patacongo
At last I removed the file.
This is an automated message from t
yamt commented on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725238471
`__GLIBC__` is not a predefined macro. it's defined by system headers.
it canl be defined again by system headers included after __config.
IMO it's better to avoid chec
xiaoxiang781216 commented on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725251420
> `__GLIBC__` is not a predefined macro. it's defined by system headers.
> it canl be defined again by system headers included after __config.
> IMO it's bet
xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725251420
> `__GLIBC__` is not a predefined macro. it's defined by system headers.
> it canl be defined again by system headers included after __config.
> IMO i
xiaoxiang781216 edited a comment on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725251420
> `__GLIBC__` is not a predefined macro. it's defined by system headers.
> it canl be defined again by system headers included after __config.
> IMO i
yamt closed pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to g
yamt commented on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725252603
> `__GLIBC__`
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
xiaoxiang781216 merged pull request #2279:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2279
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
yamt commented on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725253024
i closed this by mistake. sorry. i reopened it.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
yamt commented on pull request #2280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/2280#issuecomment-725254711
> > `__GLIBC__` is not a predefined macro. it's defined by system headers.
> > it canl be defined again by system headers included after __config.
> > IMO it's better t
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from f0bf214 sched: pthread: Fix pthread_join() for SMP
add 1dad55d sched: sched: Remove sched_tasklist
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-nuttx.git.
from f0bf214 sched: pthread: Fix pthread_join() for SMP
add 1dad55d sched: sched: Remove sched_tasklist
94 matches
Mail list logo
