Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2873324787 I am fine with either, but the rule require at least two member approve to merge your change. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mess

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2873226277 > why not fix the spell error file by file? I tried to explain it before. Sorry - I do not want to sound rude. And I do not want to the waste the boring labor of two long

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-12 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle closed pull request #16318: Documentation: fix spelling URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscrib

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-11 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2870575447 > > > I would like to wrap this PR up. Is there anything missing? > > > > > > still has error not fix yet: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/actions/runs/14902428691/job/4

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-11 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2870190208 > > I would like to wrap this PR up. Is there anything missing? > > still has error not fix yet: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/actions/runs/14902428691/job/41857195862?pr=16318

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-09 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2868336497 > I would like to wrap this PR up. Is there anything missing? still has error not fix yet: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/actions/runs/14902428691/job/41857195862?pr=16

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-09 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2867509007 I would like to wrap this PR up. Is there anything missing? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2862312868 > please fix the conflict. done -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2862246153 please fix the conflict. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specif

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-08 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2862244574 Following @xiaoxiang781216's suggestion, I prolonged the three release note lines instead of adding exceptions. The remaining exceptions for release note lines refer to commit ti

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-06 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2854683859 If we already modify Release note, I prefer to fix all problems directly instead adding the exception rule. It's always good to minimize the exception rule as much as possible.

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-06 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2854536217 I am trying to summarize the state of discussion: * A) Enabling codespell checks in `checkpatch.sh` by default? * At the moment, *no tests* are enabled by default in that s

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-06 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2854250308 > I think that the release notes should not be corrected since those are spelling errors in the actual commit titles but the similar issue in commit message is already fixed

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852038376 hint: updated PR with one more spelling fix (`MingGW`) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852015092 Thank you @sumpfralle now I saw the point, the -c parameter already existed in checkpatch.sh. The issue is: in the past it was optional, since there is no codespell check in the CI.

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2852005777 > @sumpfralle I looked again and didn't see it included inside checkpatch.sh script. > > More info about the script: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/components/tools/index.

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851981753 > > I think now the checkpatch should include the code spelling test, [..] > > I think, this was done in #16302? Or do you mean something else? @sumpfralle I looked again and

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851955035 > I think now the checkpatch should include the code spelling test, [..] I think, this was done in #16302? Or do you mean something else? -- This is an automated message from t

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
acassis commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851946384 @sumpfralle @xiaoxiang781216 I think now the checkpatch should include the code spelling test, otherwise devs only will discover about the fault too late (then it is using the CI) and we

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle commented on code in PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#discussion_r2073738401 ## .codespell-ignore-lines: ## @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ Linix 45ZWN24-40 2 0.5 Ohm0.400 mH 2.34A 24V THN, # define AES_ISR_URAT_WORRDACC (5 <<

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
nuttxpr commented on PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2851468744 [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) __Fill In The Commit Message:__ This PR contains a Commit with

Re: [PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#discussion_r2073708462 ## .codespell-ignore-lines: ## @@ -12,3 +12,10 @@ Linix 45ZWN24-40 2 0.5 Ohm0.400 mH 2.34A 24V THN, # define AES_ISR_URAT_WORRDACC

[PR] Documentation: fix spelling [nuttx]

2025-05-05 Thread via GitHub
sumpfralle opened a new pull request, #16318: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318 ## Summary This changeset builds upon previous PRs: * #16282: fix typos in documentation * #16302: enable codespell in CI This changeset fixes (or masks) all remaining issues (as