pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2086063197
##
fs/inode/fs_files.c:
##
@@ -554,16 +663,25 @@ int file_allocate_from_tcb(FAR struct tcb_s *tcb, FAR
struct inode *inode,
{
int i = minfd / CONFIG_NFILE_DESCRIPTO
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2086061232
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -490,20 +495,20 @@ struct file
* (file descriptor % CONFIG_NFILE_DESCRIPTORS_PER_BLOCK) as column index.
*/
-struct filelist
+struc
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2086061787
##
fs/inode/fs_files.c:
##
@@ -554,16 +663,25 @@ int file_allocate_from_tcb(FAR struct tcb_s *tcb, FAR
struct inode *inode,
{
int i = minfd / CONFIG_NFILE_DESCRIPTO
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2875132203
> > @jlaitine but is it wrong to skip sem holder updating in the fast path
if user enable priority inheritance?
>
> This is a good question, and raises from a confusion in t
jlaitine commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2875088409
> Are there any stats I can get for this, how much I got slow routines on
running system? Like irqinfo stats. It would be great to have something like
seminfo stats in proc
There
jlaitine commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2875077580
Re-based against latest master and added UNUSED(..) macros to pass the CI
for targets which don't enable the fast path at all.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Servi
robertc2000 opened a new pull request, #16364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16364
## Summary
This PR introduces support for Legacy Bluetooth Pairing with Passkey Entry,
specifically enabling the NuttX device to act in a "DisplayOnly" I/O capability
role. This allows the
jlaitine commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2875003933
> @jlaitine but is it wrong to skip sem holder updating in the fast path if
user enable priority inheritance?
This is a good question, and raises from a confusion in the original
shtirlic commented on PR #16354:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16354#issuecomment-2874963550
@acassis update to address readme.txt and baord docs
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
gpoulios commented on PR #3074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3074#issuecomment-2874921458
> Done, but you can update the patch to retrigger ci too.
Thank you @xiaoxiang781216. I know, I just didn’t want to lose the approvals.
--
This is an automated message from th
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #3074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3074#issuecomment-2874911563
> One check should pass now that
[apache/nuttx#16356](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356) is merged.
>
> The other failing check (msys), I don’t quite understand.
gpoulios commented on PR #3074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3074#issuecomment-2874893172
One check should pass now that https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356 is
merged.
The other failing check (msys), I don’t quite understand.
Can someone re-trigger thos
linguini1 commented on issue #16305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16305#issuecomment-2874887088
It gets much worse when I enable the command line editor mode instead of
just readline:
 as column index.
*/
-struct filelist
+struc
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit a2a689fee046d2bdb14e4f6feba8d82cc9de9040
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Sat May 10 14:40:26 2025 +0300
driver
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 6f77cb6dce35272f07a6e7a2c2716c000c41789f
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Sat May 10 17:46:59 2025 +0300
driver
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 70b595146bec486dd5282238b8778339625b3705
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Sun May 11 11:40:33 2025 +0300
boards
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 2799cba36b3690ea764748f0f7cb312163c5b282
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Sun May 11 02:52:07 2025 +0300
tools/
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit c497ee249b4ea4aa7ce41afe8a13986bf5612e40
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Fri May 9 18:04:20 2025 +0300
drivers
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from c0a6afff11 drivers/usbdev/Kconfig: fix COMPOSITE_VENDORSTR description
new c497ee249b drivers/misc/optee: Harmo
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 7f20487f56ad9e95cd2ec5ff2d2c77a30523a275
Author: George Poulios
AuthorDate: Sat May 10 15:17:27 2025 +0300
driver
linguini1 commented on issue #16305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16305#issuecomment-2874811083
I've noticed that `nsh_update_prompt()` get's called every time I hit enter,
which seems incorrect to me since it's only called during initialization and
`nsh_session()`. I don't t
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2085787448
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16359
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new c0a6afff11 drivers/usbdev/Kconfig: fix COMPOSI
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2874786311
@jlaitine but is it wrong to skip sem holder updating in the fast path if
user enable priority inheritance.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respo
linguini1 commented on issue #16305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16305#issuecomment-2874663905
This is the character I always see, across multiple boards, when using the
`miniterm` Python module. I haven't seen this when using Minicom.
 were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
new 2d2bd7ad0 Publishing web: 16e1777
linguini1 opened a new pull request, #16362:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16362
## Summary
Installation instructions, license exceptions and supported features of the
RP2040 common among all boards have been moved exclusively to the
rp2040/index.rst file. Board documenta
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085174457
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -466,6 +466,15 @@ struct file
off_t f_pos; /* File position */
Review Comment:
Yes I forgot to remove the option,
shtirlic commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2873550756
Are there any stats I can get for this, how much I got slow routines on
running system? Like irqinfo stats.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085178083
##
fs/vfs/fs_dup.c:
##
@@ -73,21 +73,28 @@ int file_dup(FAR struct file *filep, int minfd, int flags)
ret = fs_getfilep(fd2, &filep2);
#ifdef CONFIG_FDSAN
- f_tag
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085174457
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -466,6 +466,15 @@ struct file
off_t f_pos; /* File position */
Review Comment:
Yes I forgot to remove the option,
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085169044
##
net/local/local_sendmsg.c:
##
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int local_sendctl(FAR struct local_conn_s *conn,
goto fail;
}
- ret =
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085169015
##
fs/vfs/fs_dup3.c:
##
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/
- * fs/vfs/fs_dup2.c
+ * fs/vfs/fs_dup3.c
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085168370
##
net/local/local_recvmsg.c:
##
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void local_recvctl(FAR struct local_conn_s *conn,
count = peer->lc_cfpcount;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085167937
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -474,10 +483,6 @@ struct file
uint8_t f_tag_fdcheck; /* File owner fdcheck tag, init to 0 */
#endif
-#if CONFIG_
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085165125
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -959,7 +964,7 @@ int files_duplist(FAR struct filelist *plist, FAR struct
filelist *clist,
*
***
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085163075
##
include/nuttx/fs/fs.h:
##
@@ -474,10 +483,6 @@ struct file
uint8_t f_tag_fdcheck; /* File owner fdcheck tag, init to 0 */
#endif
-#if CONFIG_FS_BACKTR
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085160325
##
fs/vfs/fs_dup3.c:
##
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/
- * fs/vfs/fs_dup2.c
+ * fs/vfs/fs_dup3.c
Review
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2085116249
##
net/local/local_recvmsg.c:
##
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void local_recvctl(FAR struct local_conn_s *conn,
count = peer->lc_cfpcount;
for (i = 0; i < c
jlaitine commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2873396756
> Question: It tries to get sem only one time? Is possible to make it like 3
tries (for fast path) or configurable?
I'd assume that it is so rare occasion that two cores try to inc
jlaitine commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2873385853
changed initialization of "new" to different place for nxsem_trywait for
mips compiler thinking that it might be used uninitialized...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
shtirlic commented on PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#issuecomment-2873372820
It's interesting, I also tried to this in my recent SMP experiments, but
ditched due to lack of knowledge: )
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#discussion_r2085117186
##
libs/libc/semaphore/sem_trywait.c:
##
@@ -123,18 +126,64 @@ int nxsem_trywait(FAR sem_t *sem)
#ifndef CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC
- if (NXSEM_IS_MUTEX(sem)
+ mut
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#discussion_r2085117186
##
libs/libc/semaphore/sem_trywait.c:
##
@@ -123,18 +126,64 @@ int nxsem_trywait(FAR sem_t *sem)
#ifndef CONFIG_LIBC_ARCH_ATOMIC
- if (NXSEM_IS_MUTEX(sem)
+ mut
TimJTi commented on issue #16345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16345#issuecomment-2873340121
> Hey if things behave a bit weird, ensure that the stacksizes are
configured big enough. This is something you can easily confirm by enabling
stack canaries and running 'ps' in nsh.
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2873324787
I am fine with either, but the rule require at least two member approve to
merge your change.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
keever50 commented on issue #16345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16345#issuecomment-2873319044
Hey if things behave a bit weird, ensure that the stacksizes are configured
big enough. This is something you can easily confirm by enabling stack canaries
and running 'ps' in nsh.
keever50 commented on issue #16305:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16305#issuecomment-2873266122
> I wonder also if there is anyone with a non-RP2040 board that has USB who
can test the shell output for garbling. This would narrow it down to the RP2040
driver or a higher level
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
sumpfralle commented on PR #16318:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318#issuecomment-2873226277
> why not fix the spell error file by file?
I tried to explain it before.
Sorry - I do not want to sound rude. And I do not want to the waste the
boring labor of two long
sumpfralle closed pull request #16318: Documentation: fix spelling
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16318
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
pussuw commented on PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#issuecomment-2873177201
Reminder to self: remove the CONFIG_FS_REFCOUNT Kconfig option, it's
blocking CI it seems.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2084978945
##
fs/vfs/fs_close.c:
##
@@ -134,46 +143,84 @@ int file_close_without_clear(FAR struct file *filep)
inode_release(inode);
Review Comment:
Can someone te
pussuw commented on code in PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#discussion_r2084978945
##
fs/vfs/fs_close.c:
##
@@ -134,46 +143,84 @@ int file_close_without_clear(FAR struct file *filep)
inode_release(inode);
Review Comment:
Can someone te
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
pussuw commented on PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#issuecomment-2872948730
I will do more testing tomorrow, but marking this as ready for review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
pussuw commented on PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#issuecomment-2872946745
Added a new patch into this PR that fixes the inode refcnt leak for
pseudofiles.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
cederom commented on PR #3074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3074#issuecomment-2872942281
Thanks @gpoulios, lets keep the top level `optee/` then, okay? :-)
I am not familiar with tee/optee thus my questions, `optee` is quicker to
find any reference over `tee` :-)
gpoulios commented on PR #3074:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3074#issuecomment-2872873812
> Is the name `tee/` correct, shouldn't it be `optee/`?
The directory is named tee/ because there might be some other implementation
in the future (e.g. libamdteec or whatever).
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084812745
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084690257
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084690257
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084653304
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084653304
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
pussuw commented on PR #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361#issuecomment-2872530664
Marking as draft as this change has exposed a leak in inode refcount
handling. It causes crashes when running test_nuttx_fs_dup201().
I'll find the root cause and fix this separately
pussuw opened a new pull request, #16361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16361
## Summary
This PR is a rework of the NuttX file descriptor implementation. The
goal is two-fold:
1. Improve POSIX compliance. The old implementation tied file description
to inode on
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084627419
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2084618610
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2083967437
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #10572:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/10572#issuecomment-2872435224
the same feature is done by: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16134,
let's close this pr.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
xiaoxiang781216 closed pull request #10572: libc/sched: Use TLS when available
to cache the result of gettid syscall
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/10572
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360#discussion_r2084594418
##
libs/libc/semaphore/sem_post.c:
##
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ int sem_post(FAR sem_t *sem)
int nxsem_post(FAR sem_t *sem)
{
+ bool mutex;
+ bool use_fastpath
jlaitine commented on code in PR #16358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16358#discussion_r2084596202
##
arch/sim/src/sim/sim_oneshot.c:
##
@@ -317,7 +317,9 @@ static int sim_start(struct oneshot_lowerhalf_s *lower,
flags = enter_critical_section();
sim_timer_c
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16360:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16360
## Summary
This PR completes the semaphore "fast path" in libc, by enabling the fast
path also for counting semaphores, when they
have the priority inheritance disabled.
This is b
michallenc opened a new pull request, #16359:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16359
## Summary
Option `COMPOSITE_VENDORSTR` should be described as composite vendor string,
not vendor id. This is consistent with other USB devices.
Also fixes a typo in `USBDEV_EPBUFFER_ALIG
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit c67ac63da3a100d9497457e1185c74214c0c6a00
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Fri May 9 14:51:41 2025 +0800
timer:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 64a7049decb0671a76e7a6d1585eed8bece344df
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Fri May 9 20:07:58 2025 +0800
clock:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 3622e4830a8d38b93dfef008c946a3061fcbf5a7
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Thu May 8 19:47:02 2025 +0800
sched:
xiaoxiang781216 merged PR #16343:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16343
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nu
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit ba06ea6fd7a5161b367bcefae0168530c4068f4f
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Tue Mar 18 21:24:51 2025 +0800
sched
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
from 5d9a1aaf75 armv7a/mmu: update from l1entry replace to TTBR0 update
new ba06ea6fd7 sched/wdog: Simplify nxsched_
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 5e543421abbf64fafe9d5c2556b139aa941a1110
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Fri May 9 09:36:58 2025 +0800
clock:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 8e653753655a91829190c524e49aac3766336dc6
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 28 17:15:34 2025 +0800
sched
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit a255c99eb8a13197dc1a93b1910a4fd5d6268332
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Tue Apr 1 20:09:40 2025 +0800
sched/
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
xiaoxiang pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/nuttx.git
commit 2e8583f7590ce2f428856a12b74b27584e4881af
Author: ouyangxiangzhen
AuthorDate: Fri May 9 14:55:10 2025 +0800
clock:
anchao commented on issue #16341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16341#issuecomment-2872271185
> btw. [@anchao](https://github.com/anchao) this was closed wrongly, PR's
[#16342](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16342) or
[#16343](https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16343)
xiaoxiang781216 commented on issue #16341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16341#issuecomment-2872239272
let's reopen it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
jlaitine commented on issue #16341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16341#issuecomment-2872129154
btw. @anchao this was closed wrongly, PR's #16342 or #16343 won't fix this.
#16358 will.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
jlaitine commented on issue #16341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16341#issuecomment-2871942980
Unfortunately, the PR #16343 doesn't fix the bug. I tried to look it a bit
further, and realized that "sim" target suffers from the same tick timer drift
as what was fixed earlier f
jlaitine opened a new pull request, #16358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16358
## Summary
This removes drift in tick start times, by aligning the tick start time to
be even multiple of the tick time.
## Impact
This fixes random failures in sim:citest (cm
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2083967437
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
gpoulios commented on code in PR #16356:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16356#discussion_r2083967437
##
drivers/misc/optee.c:
##
@@ -529,10 +534,21 @@ static int optee_close(FAR struct file *filep)
{
FAR struct optee_priv_data *priv = filep->f_priv;
FAR struct
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
