Review Request: CloudStack-965: When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8992/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. Description --- The patch

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAgent thread pool size configurable

I have updated the patch, can anyone do a review? > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:43 PM > To: Koushik Das; Frank Zhang; CloudStack DeveloperList; 'Chiradeep Vittal'; > Abhinandan Prateek > Subject: RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-810: Make DirectAg

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-965) When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555974#comment-13555974 ] Isaac Chiang commented on CLOUDSTACK-965: - Hi Pranav: The reprodu

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-965) When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555976#comment-13555976 ] Pranav Saxena commented on CLOUDSTACK-965: -- Thanks a ton Isaac ! I will defin

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-998) [QA] Test Site-to-Site VPN: Monitoring of VPN Tunnels

Sanjeev N created CLOUDSTACK-998: Summary: [QA] Test Site-to-Site VPN: Monitoring of VPN Tunnels Key: CLOUDSTACK-998 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-998 Project: CloudStack

Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 07:06:01AM +0530, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) > wrote: > > My position is the same as Joe, judicious email filters. > > > > TBH I would like a copy of everything to go to the list. If certain people > > want to CC above and beyond

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-981) marvin integration lib: use factories to define default test data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasanna Santhanam reassigned CLOUDSTACK-981: - Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam > marvin integration lib: use factor

[DISCUSS] refactoring the marvin integration library

Marvin is a great tool for simplifying test case writing. The integration library within it over time has become slighlty unweildy to use while adapting to the changing API nature. In order to make test case writing quicker and somewhat intuitive I propose to do a small refactor of the integration

RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account

Hi Sanjay, Can you please clarify below questions : 1. Requirement document @ http://wiki.cloudstack.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16220191 talks about " Number of times a OS template can be deployed" . I have not found the details of this requirement in FS. Can you please clarify about t

creating rpms from source [build failed]

Hi all (again), I'm almost there (386/387!) [386/387] copy: usage/conf/usage-components.xml.in -> artifacts/default/usage/conf/usage-components.xml [echo] Using build parameters from /usr/local/incubator-cloudstack/artifacts/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloud-4.0.0/build/build-cloud.properties [ech

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix

+1 (Binding) Sent from my iPhone On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 1/15/13 5:06 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a >> donation from Citrix for Enhanced Baremetal Provision

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Tripathi updated CLOUDSTACK-713: --- Description: Limiting the resources on account/domain basis by adding new resourc

RE: [ASFCS41] Site-to-Site 2.0 enhancements

Is there any FS for Site-to-Site 2.0 enhancements(Monitoring Site-to-Site vpn tunnels)? Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 5:46 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [ASFCS41] Site-to-Site

Re: [DISCUSS] PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints (#576)

This was a good read, I think the simpler vApp method makes sense for an infrastructure tool. And could be a great opportunity to rework projects into a more useful system. I would not want to make the blueprints too complex, but my main issue with vApp methodology is how a vApp is completely s

Re: git commit: Summary: Add initial support for OpenVswitch to the KVM hypervisor

Hi Hugo, I was really interested to read this thread and to see your work on the OvsVifDriver. I've been looking at the VIF driver part of the KVM code and had a few questions: 1. What do you think of the idea of allowing different VIF drivers per traffic type? >From reading commits, it looks l

Re: Review Request: CloudStack-965: When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8992/#review15452 --- Your code changes look good . However , I have few concerns - 1) Th

RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant

Hi Likitha, Currently we can reserve the public IP range to an account. I would assume we are cross checking the account/domain limit for the max no of Public IP addresses while reserving the Public IP to an account? Please clarify. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Likit

RE: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco VSG into CloudStack

Hi, Can you please share the FS for this requirement. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 7:01 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Integrate Cisco VSG into CloudStack Hi, I would

RE: [DISCUSS] Dedicated Resources: Public IP Addresses and VLANs per Tenant

Yes, before reserving the public ip range we do verify if the account/domain is exceeding the limit. Thank You, Likitha >-Original Message- >From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:50 PM >To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org; cloudstac

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556042#comment-13556042 ] Tamas Monos commented on CLOUDSTACK-670: I still do not understand this config

RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account

Comments inline -Original Message- From: Sailaja Mada Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:39 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Sanjay Tripathi; Sailaja Mada Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account Hi Sanjay, Can you please clarify below questions : 1. Requ

[VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared networks of advanced zone. The functional specification is available at [1] and has been discussed [2] with no outstanding issues. Patch [3] and MD

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-713) Limit Resources to domain/accounts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-713?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sanjay Tripathi updated CLOUDSTACK-713: --- Description: Limiting the resources on account/domain basis by adding new resourc

[VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone. The functional specification is available at [1] and has been discussed [2] with no outstanding issues. Bug 265 [3] opened to track th

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

YAY. On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared > networks of advanced zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] a

Re: creating rpms from source [build failed]

Hi, On 01/17/2013 10:33 AM, Paul Angus wrote: Hi all (again), I’m almost there (386/387!) [386/387] copy: usage/conf/usage-components.xml.in -> artifacts/default/usage/conf/usage-components.xml [echo] Using build parameters from /usr/local/incubator-cloudstack/artifacts/rpmbuild/BUILD/c

Re: [ASF41]Closure of New Features/ Improvements

On 01/16/2013 05:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: On 01/16/2013 04:13 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: Would like to bring up the topic of when to close New features/ Improvements. I understand that we are closing new features/ improvements o

RE: [Discuss] Support for multiple ip ranges.

Hi, I have reviews Multiple IP Ranges FS available @ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+Ip+ranges+FS and below are my review comments: 1.Is there any limit on no.of subnets/IP ranges that can be added for guest?(since a new nic is added on router vm for every diffe

RE: creating rpms from source [build failed]

Hi Wido, Yes, I ran 'mvn -P deps' first, the jars I have in /deps are: cloud-iControl.jar manageontap.jar cloud-netscaler-sdx.jar cloud-netscaler.jar apputils.jar vim.jar vim25.jar is there an additional AWS/axis2 jar required somewhere? Thanks, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +4477114187

Re: [Discuss] SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

Alex, I have gone through the snmplog4jappender. As per my understanding there is no way to send traps to multiple SNMP Managers. One other thing which it is lacking is defining different OIDs for different kind of alerts. Even in some way we are able to achieve above things using the library

Re: [MERGE, ACS41] Merge branch cloud-agent-with-openvswitch

On 01/15/2013 10:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey all, I would like to merge my branch with master. This branch deals with the items reported in tickets CLOUDSTACK-934, CLOUDSTACK-727, CLOUDSTACK-101. Basically the patch introduces support for dealing with bridges and interfaces on KVM hyperv

Re: "mvn install" failed on apache 4.0 branch: [ERROR] Could not find the selected project in the reactor: developer -> [Help 1]

On 01/16/2013 08:13 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > Any error message when it's failed? > No, but all is fine and the RHES63 4.0.1 build works as documented. The issue here was a script typo ('-P' --> '-D') in 'mvn -P deps install'. When command was given manually things worked as expected. /Ove

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

I remember this discussion. +1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > YAY. > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > >> I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a >> donation from Citrix to supp

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-999) Plugin to provide Hyper-V 2012 support

Donal Lafferty created CLOUDSTACK-999: - Summary: Plugin to provide Hyper-V 2012 support Key: CLOUDSTACK-999 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999 Project: CloudStack I

Re: devcloud news

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:39:52PM -0500, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Guys, > > I'm happy to announce that the devcloud-kvm is open for business :-) I > just ran through the doc at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/devcloud-kvm and > everything worked. I'll see if I can clean

Re: Asymmetric NIC prepare / release behaviour in NetworkManagerImpl

On 17/01/13 10:51 AM, "Mills, Joseph" wrote: >Hi Murali, > >Thanks for the link. I see in that mail: > >Create - IP address assigned to the NIC stays across start/stop sessions > > >In the case where I am not seeing a corresponding release to a prepare >call, the reservation strategy is 'Create'.

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Enhanced Baremetal Provisioning support from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 10:38 AM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" wrote: > +1 (Binding) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On 1/15/13 5:06 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >> wrote: >> >>> I would like to call a vote for the

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-988: HV version must be updated in hypervisor_version column of host table

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Nitin Mehta and Alex Huang. Description ---

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:53:22PM -0500, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >> Reposting with subject line VOTE >> >> Committers have binding votes for this decision. >> >> Please respond with your vote: >> +1 - Accept the donation

RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db

Posted the review for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/ > -Original Message- > From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:15 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db > >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-988) HV version must be updated in hypervisor_version column of host table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556130#comment-13556130 ] Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-988: Review @ https://reviews.apache.org/r

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-602) Warn of dependency on mkisofs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556133#comment-13556133 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-602: - Could we add this item as a trouble

RE: Questions related to Regions Feature

Manan, Please find my answers inline. > -Original Message- > From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 16 January 2013 1:57 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: FW: Questions related to Regions Feature > > Kishan, > > I reviewed the FS and I h

RE: CloudStack Hyper V support

JIRA ticket created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999 > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: 14 January 2013 12:17 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: CloudStack Hyper V support > > Updated cwiki to

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-822 system.vm.password is not encrypted

4.0 had no encryption enabled. user.vm.random.password is by default false, so system.vm.password won't be present in the db by default. Only if user.vm.random.password is set to true, system.vm.password will be generated but would be unencrypted. So the upgrade script will search for user.vm.p

Re: Review Request: CloudStack-965: When a detailview action is prohibited, the operation dialog box should not show up in the mean time

> On Jan. 17, 2013, 10:15 a.m., Pranav Saxena wrote: > > Your code changes look good . However , I have few concerns - > > > > 1) The patch doesn't apply cleanly because of trailing whitespace errors . > > Hence could you take care of these - > > > > home/pranav/Downloads/fix-cloudstack-965.

Re: CloudStack Hyper V support

Donal, Since you are doing the work, maybe you can assign 999 to yourself and set it as "in progress" -sebastien On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > JIRA ticket created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999 > >> -Original Message- >> From: Donal Laff

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-297 Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8905/ --- (Updated Jan. 17, 2013, 1:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan

RE: CloudStack Hyper V support

You'll have to help me out on that one. The 'Workflow' drop down is disabled, and I can't see where to access 'Assignee'. Any suggestions? > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 January 2013 13:49 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

Hi, I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for CLOUDSTACK-297: Reset SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password) Citrix would like to donate this code to Apache Cloudstack. With this new API command resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine,

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556201#comment-13556201 ] Hari Kannan commented on CLOUDSTACK-670: Hi Tamas, The way I envision this is

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-670) Configurable setting to use linked clones or not on VMware

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556207#comment-13556207 ] Tamas Monos commented on CLOUDSTACK-670: Thank you! This clears things up.

JVM level cluster deployments

Hi, I would appreciate if anyone can provide feedback on following questions: Roughly what is the number of cloudStack deployments that are in JVM (tomcat or other server) cluster mode where all session objects, http sessions, beans etc are seamlessly failed over to the other node in case one of

RE: CloudStack Hyper V support

Chip, Alex or David may be able to help you. They can give you the rights so that bugs can be assigned to you :). Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:46 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apac

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 This is a useful addition that will automate resetting ssh keys used for password less logins to user Vms. -abhi On 17/01/13 7:52 PM, "Harikrishna Patnala" wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for >CLOUDSTACK-297

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-938: -- Priority: Major (was: Blocker) > s2s VPN trouble > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556252#comment-13556252 ] Joe Brockmeier commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- This is not a blocker bug, I'm

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-938: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1) 4.0.2 > s2s VPN trouble > --

Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013, at 06:43 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > This some how relate with the mail client. You can copy all mail sent > CC/TO you in one folder, and if one mail sent to the mailing list > copied you, set a rule to mark the same mail in the mailing list > folder as read, but kept the one in y

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-822) system.vm.password is not encrypted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Saksham Srivastava updated CLOUDSTACK-822: -- Description: Currently the system.vm.password is stored in the db unencrypt

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-299 Egress firewall rules feature for guest network on VR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9010/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Animesh Chaturvedi. Descri

[VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

Hi, I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for CLOUDSTACK-2999>:Egress firewall rules for guest network. Citrix would like to donate this code to Apache Cloudstack. Using egre

RE: [DISCUSS] IP Address Reservation within a network

Hi Saksham, To comment on your question: >> Should shared guest networks also allow for IP reservation considering >> the current scenario where Start IP and End IP are mandatory during shared >> guest network creation. Isn't this functionality already implicitly present for shared network

RE: creating rpms from source [build failed]

I've a bit more information: -- compile-utils: [mkdir] Created dir: /usr/local/incubator-cloudstack/artifacts/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloud-4.0.0/target/classes/cloud-utils.jar BUILD FAILED /usr/local/incubator-cloudstack/artifacts/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloud-4.0.0/build/build-cl

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with > Basic Zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] and has been discussed

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared > networks of advanced zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] and has be

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for > CLOUDSTACK-297: Reset > SSH key to access VM (Similar to reset password) > > Citrix would like to donate this code to Ap

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > > > I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for > CLOUDSTACK-2999>:Egress > firewall rules for guest network. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:07:10PM +0530, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB) in shared > networks of advanced zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] a

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:17:58PM +0530, Murali Reddy wrote: > I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a > donation from Citrix to provide Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with > Basic Zone. > > The functional specification is available at [1] and has been d

[Jenkins] Killed cloudstack-network-refactor #5

Hi, I just killed cloudstack-network-refactor #5 [1], it had been going at it for more than five days now. -- Kristian [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-network-refactor/5/console

Re: [DISCUSS] Email etiquette CC or not CC

I set up 7-9 JIRA folders, discussion, version, etc folders. Basically I sort my email I Dev based on the awesome [tags] in all the subject lines, and then a folder for what's left over. It keeps it very organized. I also have it set the red flag if any of these emails have my name/email in the

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:29 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Harikrishna Patnala > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for >> CLOUDSTACK-297: Reset >>

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'd like to start the process of IP Clearance for >> CLOUDSTACK-299

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone On Jan 17, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:07:10PM +0530, Murali Reddy wrote: >> I would like to call a vote for the Apache CloudStack project to accept a >> donation from Citrix to support network services (PF, NAT, LB)

Re: [Discuss] Cpu and Ram overcommit.

Alex thank you for your suggestions, I will add them to the functional spec. Bharat. On Jan 16, 2013, at 4:19 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Bharat, > > A few comments. > > - On your caveats, I think you should deploy 2b. Accept the change but not > add more VMs anymore. You can provide a warnin

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone' from Citrix.

+1 > -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Prasanna > Santhanam > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 8:50 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'providing support of optional > Public IP > ass

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:08 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in > CloudStack from Citrix > > +1 (binding) > > Sent f

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for guest network for CloudStack from Citrix

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:08 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for > guest > network for CloudStack from Citrix > > +

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared network' from Citrix.

+1 > -Original Message- > From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:09 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared > network' from Citrix. > > +1 (binding) > > Sent

[VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

Reposting with subject line VOTE Committers have binding votes for this decision. Please respond with your vote: +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this +enhancement to CloudStack in via the IP clearance process +0 - Don't care -1 - Do not accept the donation This vote w

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:34 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > +1 > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:08 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset

RE: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened

Radhika Now that VOTE emails are out for IP Clearance features, can you check and post your corresponding doc links in the respective threads Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:02 PM > To: 'cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org' > S

Re: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

+1 (binding) On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:41 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Reposting with subject line VOTE > > Committers have binding votes for this decision. > > Please respond with your vote: > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this > +enhancement to CloudStack > in v

RE: [DISCUSS] PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints (#576)

Great analysis Chris! In terms of the blueprint model, I am also in favor of something simple. CloudFormation can do what vApp is doing, and more. We only need to implement a subset as a starter. For example, allow users to describe multiple VMs, template ID for the VMs, and default service off

[VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix

Reposting with subject line VOTE. Committers have binding votes for this decision. Please respond with your vote: +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this +enhancement to CloudStack in via the IP clearance process +0 - Don't care -1 - Do not accept the donation This vote

RE: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

Thanks for the write-up, One comment, Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? >*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

> -Original Message- > From: Harikrishna Patnala [mailto:harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 6:22 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in > CloudStack from Citrix > > Hi, > > I'd l

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556411#comment-13556411 ] Sheng Yang commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: --- 2013-01-16 16:04:33,988 DEBUG [agent.tr

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556411#comment-13556411 ] Sheng Yang edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-938 at 1/17/13 5:52 PM:

Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Reset SSH Key to access a VM in CloudStack from Citrix

Animesh, So now I am confused with all those [VOTE] threads… Are we voting on each proposed donation separately from the docs or is the docs included within the vote. for 297, the docs needs some work…the first sentence makes it sound like this will allow users to log into Cloudstack mgt server

RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:49 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix Reposting with subject line VOTE.

RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

+1 -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:41 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix Reposting wit

RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

+1(binding) -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:31 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix +1

RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network in advanced zone" from Citrix

Update with doc link > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:41 AM > To: 'cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org' > Subject: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled network > in advanced zone" from Citrix > > Reposting with sub

RE: [Discuss] SNMP Alerts support in CloudStack

Anshul, If you implement your own SNMPlog4j appender then again it will not be tightly coupled with CloudStack? Can you confirm that? Thanks, RamG > -Original Message- > From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com] > Sent: 17 January 2013 16:58 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.

RE: [IP Clearance: CLOUDSTACK-778] Feedback requested

Folks please review the patch posted by Vijay and let us know if this is significant enough to go through IP clearance. > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:29 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556424#comment-13556424 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: /opt/cloud/bin/ipsectunnel.sh

Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu wrote: > Thanks for the write-up, > > One comment, > Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? > >>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address IPv6 required one auto configured link local address per nic(means likely one nic would have mo

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-938) s2s VPN trouble

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556429#comment-13556429 ] Marcus Sorensen commented on CLOUDSTACK-938: fix is in master

  1   2   3   4   >