sebastien goasguen created CLOUDSTACK-626:
-
Summary: guest_os table does not have latest distro
Key: CLOUDSTACK-626
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-626
Project: CloudStack
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8534/#review14501
---
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/Libvir
Good point David. I assume it will be hard to re-create all of these
accounts under the ACS name.
I suggest to change content to refer to that the project name is Apache
Cloud Stack and also update logos, update sites references to the Apache
one when possible, etc ...
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy
Libvirt is unable to mount the secondary storage.
libvir: error : internal error Child process (/bin/mount
rwsnas302.us.oracle.com:/export/bpocloud/template/tmpl/1/3
/mnt/fb6b800b-0a0a-4cfa-96e3-c7d93483102f) status unexpected: exit status
32
Check permissions? NFS on zfs is also picky about the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 9:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers,
> On Dec. 13, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > The patch applies cleanly, but it does not build. I stopped at two errors.
> > There's a syntax error in en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml at line 21 -
> > there are two comment closures (-->) so you need to remove one.
> >
> > It al
Hi,
While upgrading from ASF 4.0 to 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 management server I am
getting this weird dependency error :
Welcome to the Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Installer. What would you like
to do?
A) Install the Agent
S) Install the Usage Monitor
U) Upgrade the CloudStack pa
Abhinav Roy created CLOUDSTACK-627:
--
Summary: Upgrade from
Key: CLOUDSTACK-627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-627
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security L
Abhinav Roy created CLOUDSTACK-628:
--
Summary: Upgrade from
Key: CLOUDSTACK-628
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-628
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wido den Hollander updated CLOUDSTACK-451:
--
Assignee: ilya musayev
> System VMs shouldn't be just Debian based
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abhinav Roy closed CLOUDSTACK-627.
--
> Upgrade from
> -
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-627
> U
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abhinav Roy resolved CLOUDSTACK-627.
Resolution: Invalid
Got Created by mistake
> Upgrade from
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abhinav Roy updated CLOUDSTACK-628:
---
Component/s: Install and Setup
Fix Version/s: 4.0.1
Priority: B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abhinav Roy updated CLOUDSTACK-628:
---
Description:
Description :
===
While upgrading from ASF 4.0 to 4
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:05 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Devdeep Singh
>
The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from C#.
The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
The addition would follow community processes, which includes posting a feature
spec on wiki, announcing this to community, answering questions on design,
prop
I should be a bit more clear. I'm talking about categories of plugin, not
about whether there will be specific names for each.
Specifically, I'm concerned that the term 'plugin' will get overloaded. If it
means too many things, it will be difficult to explain the CloudStack
architecture to ne
Okay, but I'd like a way of distinguishing in speech and text this new way of
extending CloudStack from the existing way.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 December 2012 2:05 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-628:
Assignee: edison su
> Upgrade from ASF 4.0 to 4.0.1 fails with some depende
Hi, folks,
I’d like to discuss the possibility of introducing feature VM Snapshot in CS
version 4.1 and I need some inputs/ideas for the rest of work.
The background/spec/design is in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Snapshots.
The implementation is very straightforward
Chip,
You and I have permission on Jira now. I've put up my filter and added it to
the 4.1 release page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release
We probably can do the same for a list of bugs as well.
To do this:
On Jira:
- Create a filter
- Click on Vie
Heya Sonny,
What kind of plugins would this be? I like the idea of being able to extend the
ui dynamically, but I fail to see the use case here. Could you give some
examples of what kind of plugins would end up using this system?
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Laffer
Hey Manah,
Can you put in a requirements that this feature is only available if Vlans are
actually in use? It might be interesting to make sure that this "nTier apps" is
also available for sites with an SDN based installation like Nicira NVP.
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From:
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-629:
-
Summary: Add the ability for other people to contribute to Storage
Key: CLOUDSTACK-629
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-629
Project: CloudStack
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-630:
-
Summary: Redo storage orchestration for volume
Key: CLOUDSTACK-630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-630
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-635:
-
Summary: Move the existing provisioning code into plugins
Key: CLOUDSTACK-635
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-635
Project: CloudStack
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-631:
-
Summary: Create interfaces for Storage Provisioning Plugin
Key: CLOUDSTACK-631
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-631
Project: CloudStack
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-633:
-
Summary: Redo the orchestration for snapshots
Key: CLOUDSTACK-633
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-633
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type:
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-632:
-
Summary: Start a new VM with the new orchestration
Key: CLOUDSTACK-632
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-632
Project: CloudStack
Issue
Alex Huang created CLOUDSTACK-634:
-
Summary: Introduce plugins for the provisioning of the snapshots
Key: CLOUDSTACK-634
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-634
Project: CloudStack
Heya,
Getting a bit late into the discussion here, but i agree with Chip here.
I'm already uncomfortable with the idea for a marketplace inside CloudStack,
but providing just the features allow some external party (or parties) to set
something up should be ok. But neither the ASF nor we as a c
With the new feature proposals coming in for 4.1, I like to propose that we add
a new workflow in Jira for new feature and improvement issue types.
- At creation, it should be "Discuss".
- Once input has been gathered on the mailing list, it should move into
"Discussed". On this status, the UR
Hi,
There is a comment from Jessica in https://reviews.apache.org/r/8237/ that says
that user registration is not required for AWSAPI.
Can one of the developers (Prachi, Likitha, Rajesh..) comment on this ?
From a previous thread with Likitha, I thought that user registration was
mandatory eve
Hi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the new feature proposals coming in for 4.1, I like to propose that
> we add a new workflow in Jira for new feature and improvement issue types.
>
> - At creation, it should be "Discuss".
> - Once input has been gathered on the mailin
>From Likitha I heard we don't need user registration for EC2 Query API.
@Likitha can you confirm it.?
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 7:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [A
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] new workflow for new features
>
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Alex Huang wr
You are right Sebastien, like we discussed in the previous thread we do need
perform user-registration before making both EC2 SOAP and EC2 Query API calls.
The difference is the steps in the user-registration,
1. For SOAP, cloudstack-aws-api-register --apikey= --secretkey=< User's CloudPlatfo
Donal,
There is already a CLI tool that Rohit had written. The C# client can also go
in there and have a similar hierarchy in the source tree.
BTW, have you considered making it Powershell cmdlets instead?
Thanks,
Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@ci
Collocation with CLI seems intuitive.
AFAIK, you can build a cmdlet library on to of the SDK. This would have to be
done in a follow up project.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 December 2012 4:07 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mohammad Nour El-Din [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 6:17 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] new workflow for new features...
Thanks, It turns out my storage administrator did not have the export
permissions set as requested. All is working once again.
-jason
On 12/14/2012 12:52 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Libvirt is unable to mount the secondary storage.
libvir: error : internal error Child process (/bin/mount
rwsna
Sure, Hugo. I can add that. As you said, longer term, we should make this
work with an SDN based solution as well.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 12/14/12 5:32 AM, "Hugo Trippaers"
wrote:
>Hey Manah,
>
>Can you put in a requirements that this feature is only available if
>Vlans are actually in use?
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Donal Lafferty
wrote:
> The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from C#.
> The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
>
> The addition would follow community processes, which includes posting a
> feature spec on wiki, a
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Mice Xia wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> I’d like to discuss the possibility of introducing feature VM Snapshot in CS
> version 4.1 and I need some inputs/ideas for the rest of work.
>
> The background/spec/design is in
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532469#comment-13532469
]
David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-628:
-
Please don't use install.sh - that
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In looking at the list of jira records that have no fix version in
> them, I realize that we probably need to start triaging them on a
> semi-regular basis.
>
> In order to ensure that the triage work doesn't require looking at th
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the new feature proposals coming in for 4.1, I like to propose that we
> add a new workflow in Jira for new feature and improvement issue types.
>
> - At creation, it should be "Discuss".
> - Once input has been gathered on the mailing lis
Thanks for the info, David!
I have joined #cloudstack-dev now, so that should help, as well.
Also, I can fork
https://github.com/apache/incubator-cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack.git and
work from it.
Sounds like any work I do should be performed on the javelin branch, true?
Thanks again!!
On
Hi All,
Current guest VM by default having one NIC and one IP address assigned.
If your wants extra IP for the guest VM, there no provision from the CS.
Using multiple IP address per NIC feature CS can associate IP address for the
NIC, user can take that IP and assign it to the VM.
Please fin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/#review14508
---
Was applied on master:
commit b70c1a5a84ee014d980c07555d341f16ed515cb
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Chip,
>
> You and I have permission on Jira now. I've put up my filter and added it to
> the 4.1 release page.
Awesome, thanks!
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release
>
> We probably can do the same f
Sure. Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:16 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Api refactoring
Fang,
Please add a improvement issue in Jira and have it set for 4.1 release o
>
> 2.4.2. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair
> is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President,
> Apache CloudStack) and has primary responsibility to the board for the
> management of the projects within the scope of the CloudStack PMC. The
> chair
Just to be clear, this feature is to simply track multiple IPs in the ui/db
correct?
There is no mechanism to prevent an existing tenant from creating up aliases on
their subnet. So currently users can manually setup all the IPs they want in
guest VMs.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 14, 2012, at
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:47 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> 2.4.2. The chair of the PMC is appointed by the ASF board. The chair
>> is an office holder of the Apache Software Foundation (Vice President,
>> Apache CloudStack) and has primary responsibility to the board for the
>> management of the
Fang Wang created CLOUDSTACK-636:
Summary: API refactoring -- restructuring the access check and
validation
Key: CLOUDSTACK-636
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-636
Project: Clou
Howie
What mail client do you use? If you are on Exchange then your administrator
should be able to change the display name
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: howie...@trend.com.tw [mailto:howie...@trend.com.tw]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:41 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubat
For a feature with several people working on it, if we create couple of bugs
to track it, shall we add
A field to point to a "master" bug to track the discussions, documents, etc?
The master bug can contain all the proposal, discussions, etc. And the
individual features can be
Tracked in each
On 14-Dec-2012, at 8:54 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Donal Lafferty
> wrote:
>> The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from
>> C#. The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
>>
>> The addition would follow community pr
On 12/12/12 6:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'd like to start a conversation about our project bylaws. This is
>something that an Apache project doesn't absolutely require, but I
>believe that some of the larger TLP's have found it to be valuable.
>More specifically, I would like t
Hi
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Fang Wang wrote:
> For a feature with several people working on it, if we create couple of
> bugs to track it, shall we add
> A field to point to a "master" bug to track the discussions, documents,
> etc?
> The master bug can contain all the proposal, discus
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:48:19PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7571/
> Encode URI during vmware cluster discovery
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8013/
> removed some unused connection properties
>
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8037/
> Fix for CLOUDSTACK-284
>
> h
Welcome Mike!
Yes, go ahead fork the git repository on github and start hacking on your
personal branch tracking the javelin branch.
Regards.
On 14-Dec-2012, at 9:35 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Thanks for the info, David!
>
> I have joined #cloudstack-dev now, so that should help, as well.
>
+1
>
> If the feature needs to be done in a set of smaller sub-tasks/features
> then, IMHO, I would suggest to abstract the main outline of the feature in
> a main Task and flesh out the details in sub-Tasks, the same goes for bugs
>
The proposal talks about a "Apache Listing Repository" and discusses
choices of where to host it.
The proposal should remove "Apache" from that description.
I agree with the sentiment in this thread:
the ACS git repository is not the right place to have these listings.
On 12/14/12 6:08 AM, "Hugo
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> On 12/12/12 6:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>2.1. Users
>>
>>The most important participants in the project are people who use our
>>software. Users contribute to the Apache projects by providing
>>feedback to developers in the form of b
>
> So what does this mean for a user requesting a feature or enhancement in
> Jira?
>
> User $foo may want CloudStack to provision coffee via IPMI, but they
> may also not have the ability to write that feature, but want to ask
> for it. Do they also need to bring it to the list? It seems very
>
We should make it a rule. As long as they didn't put in the commit id, we keep
going back to the reviewer.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: PLEAS
Vijay Venkatachalam created CLOUDSTACK-637:
--
Summary: AutoScale
Key: CLOUDSTACK-637
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Improvem
Sounds good...thanks, Rohit!
By the way, I will be out of the office next week and not online, but once
I get back I plan to start digging into the code. :)
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Welcome Mike!
> Yes, go ahead fork the git repository on github and start hacking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vijay Venkatachalam resolved CLOUDSTACK-637.
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
> AutoScale
> -
>
>
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-638:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Run api-server as a hybrid (part
standalone, part dependent on ms) server
Key: CLOUDSTACK-638
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/#review14511
---
Breaks build, patch does not have Validator.java, can you share that
Jira for AutoScaling:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637
Thanks,
Vijay V.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41] Feature Stat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 7:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav updated CLOUDSTACK-636:
---
Description: The aim is to refactor and clean up the spaghetti acl and (db)
validation co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-637:
-
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Improvement)
> AutoScale
> -
>
>
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-639:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Adapters for ACL
Key: CLOUDSTACK-639
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-639
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type:
Fang Wang created CLOUDSTACK-640:
Summary: API refactoring - Integrate hibernate validator
Key: CLOUDSTACK-640
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640
Project: CloudStack
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532560#comment-13532560
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-639:
Part 1 was mostly already done by Pra
Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-641:
--
Summary: API Refactoring: Generate better docs
Key: CLOUDSTACK-641
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-641
Project: CloudStack
Issue Ty
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8601/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add paramete
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/#review14512
---
Thanks, work in progress. Holding onto the previous patch but committ
> On Dec. 13, 2012, 3:17 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > The patch applies cleanly, but it does not build. I stopped at two errors.
> > There's a syntax error in en-US/creating-network-offerings.xml at line 21 -
> > there are two comment closures (-->) so you need to remove one.
> >
> > It al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532595#comment-13532595
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-640:
Not sure if we should go for it.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8601/#review14514
---
Ship it!
Applied on api_refactoring:
commit 27482045ceef4ee4e8165c2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532600#comment-13532600
]
Fang Wang commented on CLOUDSTACK-640:
--
I actually do not want to go that way. Bu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8603/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
API refactor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532602#comment-13532602
]
William DeCoste commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
Hi all,
Just want to point o
Folks
I was reading this blog on OpenSource Community Analysis
http://www.qyjohn.net/?p=2427 and here is a quote from it
"When the CY12-Q2 report was published, some people questioned the inclusion
of the incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list. This particular mailing list
contains a lot of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:54 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Donal Lafferty
> wrote:
>> The library was developed in Citrix to simplify accessing the CS API from
>> C#. The intent is to release code under the ASLv2.0 license.
>>
>> The addition would follow community
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8534/
---
(Updated Dec. 14, 2012, 8:09 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Hi all,
I'm writing this email with my PPMC member hat on, but not speaking
*for* the PPMC.
This is a bit long, but needs to be shared. Please do take time the time
to read it.
Recently, some of us have been struggling with how to help guide the
community toward better collaboration on this lis
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:30:45PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a conversation about our project bylaws. This is
> something that an Apache project doesn't absolutely require, but I
> believe that some of the larger TLP's have found it to be valuable.
> 1.3. CloudSt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8605/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add annotati
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8606/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add annotati
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm writing this email with my PPMC member hat on, but not speaking
> *for* the PPMC.
>
> This is a bit long, but needs to be shared. Please do take time the time
> to read it.
>
> Recently, some of us have been struggling with h
I think this is a great discussion to have, but I think it would help if
there were specific examples you could share so that we all have a better
understanding. For example, I think I'm guilty of this in some respects,
but I'm not sure if this is what you're talking about. Let me post one of
my ex
Thanks Bill! We will take you up on the offer -- perhaps to contribute an
example OpenShift blueprint (when we have a candidate impl).
Best,
Alex
On Dec 14, 2012 7:58 PM, "William DeCoste (JIRA)" wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532681#comment-13532681
]
Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
--
Thanks Bill! We will take you up
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo