Need help for api/commands test cases

2012-12-04 Thread Meghna Kale
Hi there, While writing the unit test cases for api/commands there is a call to a static method of class UserContext (UserContext.current().setEventDetails("Vm Id: " +getVirtualMachineId()+ " ISO Id: "+getId());). I’m unable to mock this static class. I’m using Mockito 1.9.5 for unit testing ,

Re: XenServer & VM Snapshots

2012-12-04 Thread Nitin Mehta
On 04-Dec-2012, at 12:44 PM, Marc Cirauqui wrote: If I may, we've detected very poor performance executing snapshots. We think it's due to XenServer's API, I don't know how and why, but the API is very slow and runs one task at a time (if it is doing paralelization it's almost nothing). Do you

Re: Access to builds.apache.org

2012-12-04 Thread Olivier Lamy
2012/12/3 Prasanna Santhanam : > Hi Olivier, > > Could you provide me with access as well, as I need to move a couple > of jobs from jenkins.c.o to builds.a.o? what is your apache id ? > > Thanks, > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 06:24:32AM -0500, Olivier Lamy wrote: >> Hi, >> Done. ping me if it doesn'

API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi everyone, The API refactoring work for 4.1.0 is going on in api_refactoring branch: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/api_refactoring So far I've broken the user level APIs (build system is broken on the branch), admin level API is wip.

RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi, I tried to use Ubutnu build available @ http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-4.0.1-nonoss-ubuntu/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/CloudStack-non-OSS-4.0.1-1.tar.bz2 . Cloudstack packages are built with 4.0.0 version name. These has to be named with 4.0.1 to do upgrade from 4.0 to 4.0.1. P

Router VM peaks at ~920 Mbit/s instad of 4000 Mbit/s network offering rate limit

2012-12-04 Thread Wolfram Schlich
Hi! Does a router VM have another kind of network rate limitation besides the one from the network offering? We have the network offering set to 4000 Mbit/s which is resembled by XenServer through limiting the interface bandwidth to 500MByte/s (checked that). With unrouted traffic within a Cloud

Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Devdeep Singh
Hi, With XenServer 6.1, support for storage xenmotion has been added in XenServer. I am planning to work on enabling support for XenServer 6.1 and storage xenmotion in CloudStack. It'll involve the following activities: 1. Enable support in CloudStack for XenServer 6.1. There is already a bug f

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 11:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

RE: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi Devdeep, This is regarding XenMotion, I have noticed few known issues specified in the given link such as : 1. When migrating VMs using Storage XenMotion, attempts to cancel the operation may not delete the temporary virtual disks. [CA-87710] [CA-87689] 2. When a VM is unexpectedly shut down

Re: Static Analysis Tools

2012-12-04 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Sonar analysis of Cloudstack is also available via nemo portal at: http://nemo.sonarsource.org/dashboard/index/org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack -sebastien On Nov 20, 2012, at 7:44 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: >> >> Folks >> >> I want

[Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Radhika Puthiyetath
Hello Community, Any thoughts on the need of a style guide for the CloudStack Documentation ? First of all, do we need one-If yes, do we need to create afresh , or follow the existing style guides within Apache projects, such as Maven. Here is the link: http://maven.apache.org/guides/developmen

RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Sudha Ponnaganti
Sailaja Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is not done yet. Thanks /Sudha -Original Message- From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:48 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-580) Packages are named with 4.0 with 4.0.1 build

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada (JIRA)
Sailaja Mada created CLOUDSTACK-580: --- Summary: Packages are named with 4.0 with 4.0.1 build Key: CLOUDSTACK-580 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-580 Project: CloudStack

RE: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Sailaja Mada
Hi Sudha, I have created the issue @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-580 Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:47 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [ASF

Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
> 2. Update the java bindings that are used by CloudStack for making xapi > calls. The current bindings are present under deps/XenServerJava in source > tree. They need to be updated for getting the new apis that have been added > for supporting storage xenmotion. CloudStack has made customizati

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Duncan Johnston Watt wrote: > Chip/All > > Just to add to this feature request provided we have the support/backing of > the community we would be happy to lead this effort/commit resources to > this as it is well aligned with our other efforts in the open source [1

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509836#comment-13509836 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Dun

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-581) Unable to create VM Instance after being able to creating small number of VMs.

2012-12-04 Thread Adam Kamali (JIRA)
Adam Kamali created CLOUDSTACK-581: -- Summary: Unable to create VM Instance after being able to creating small number of VMs. Key: CLOUDSTACK-581 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-581

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Huang
This is an exception returned by the xapi layer in XenServer. You can track it down further by looking at the xenserver logs on the hypervisor the vm tried to start on. There's a log on /var/log/xensource.log. Look through there and see what it doesn't like about the parameter it's trying to

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld
Hi folks-- To get the ball rolling here are a few questions on design/features. And my answers, in order to kick off the argument discussion this needs! I'll collate and post at #576. *(1) Should we try for an AWS or vApp look-alike? Or build something around Cloudstack concepts?* Som

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509865#comment-13509865 ] Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: -- Hi folks-- To get the ball roll

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Alex, There is no /var/log/xensource.log file on the XCP machine running in VirtualBox (= Devcloud2) but those one : ls -la /var/log -rw--- 1 root root20206 Dec 4 16:58 xcp-networkd.log -rw--- 1 root root 113299 Dec 4 17:04 xcp-squeezed.log -rw--- 1 root

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Ram Ganesh
Google'ing around the exception took me to this link - http://old-list-archives.xen.org/archives/html/xen-api/2009-11/msg00123.html > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: 04 December 2012 22:32 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: R

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell
Alex, You may also want to take a look at OpenShift (https://github.com/openshift). Rather than VMs, they separate applications using SELinux controls which leads to far greater densities. This approach has allowed them to support a number of unique features (such as SSH access for each accou

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509873#comment-13509873 ] John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Alex, You may also want to take a

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld
John, +1 && thanks for the idea. I'm a big fan of OpenShift. I think that should definitely be a supported deployment tech. We've done similar (lightweight isolation) with LXC at one of our customers. So the question is whether things like this should be a native option? Or do we aim to

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Heneveld (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509883#comment-13509883 ] Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: -- John, +1 && thanks for the idea

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell
Alex, My thought is a PaaS would be implemented in a manner akin to BareMetal whereby an SPI would be provided to direct the allocation of resources (compute, storage, and network) to one or more PaaS instances. CloudStack would provide a common authentication and authorization layer allowing

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread John Burwell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509892#comment-13509892 ] John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Alex, My thought is a PaaS would b

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/#review14022 --- Looks better now, please add Prasanna (tsp) and myself on the people/

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
I am in agreement with this, as a content IaaS provider, I would not want integration to go so far as to cloud or obfuscate the IaaS systems in favor of PaaS. To me they are 2 distinct and seperate methodologies. I do like PaaS, and would think it more of an opportunity for an add on system it l

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509903#comment-13509903 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- I am in agreement with

Re: Access to builds.apache.org

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:12:39PM +0530, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2012/12/3 Prasanna Santhanam : > > Hi Olivier, > > > > Could you provide me with access as well, as I need to move a couple > > of jobs from jenkins.c.o to builds.a.o? > what is your apache id ? t...@apache.org -- Prasanna.,

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Alex Huang
Ah...Didn't realize you're using devCloud. Anthony is right in another email. This is most likely due to a mismatch between the xapi java stub library your deployment is using and the xapi your devcloud is on. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.

Re: New PPMC Member: Chiradeep Vittal

2012-12-04 Thread Kelven Yang
Congratulations Chiradeep! Kelven

Re: Router VM peaks at ~920 Mbit/s instad of 4000 Mbit/s network offering rate limit

2012-12-04 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
There is no configured limit inside the router vm. - what test tool are you using? (iperf?) - what is the location of the router vm vis-a-vis the non-router vm? - I would imagine that you want to test in the following sequence: A. instance -> routervm (both on same host) B. instance -> routervm (on

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Sailaja > > Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is not > done yet. Sure I'll fix the binary - but these are just convenience binaries and not the source release itself. So I wouldn't see it as a release

RE: Static Analysis Tools

2012-12-04 Thread Demetrius Tsitrelis
At the conference you showed a URL with the results. Is that publicly available? -Original Message- From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:53 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Static Analysis Tools Allow me to clarify my

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
There should be a facility to locate the API under a specific namespace. E.g., compute: :8080/compute/ loadbalancer: :8080/lb/ volume: :8080/volume/ On 12/4/12 2:19 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi everyone, > >The API refactoring work for 4.1.0 is going on in api_refactoring branch: >https://git-

RE: [Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Radhika The Struts style guide has more details http://struts.apache.org/2.2.3/docs/documentation-style-guide.html and we can borrow some tips from there. One other thing I think will help users is quick link to Single Page Html. This is useful because people often want to search for a speci

Re: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-04 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
+1 from me. Crosspost to 'users' list perhaps? On 12/3/12 11:41 PM, "Robyn Bergeron" wrote: >Greetings. > >A quick bit of background, esp. as I'm effectively a "long time reader, >first time poster" - I attended the collaboration conference over the past >weekend, became involved in a discussi

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/ --- (Updated Dec. 4, 2012, 6:49 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santha

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Bryan Whitehead
I'd like to see these and other API functions made available in the GUI. On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote: > This sounds great, I would certainly use these enhanced API services for > persistent and semi-persistent infra. I can even see potential in elastic > situations

RE: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-04 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
I think it sounds great +1 KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com - kel...@bbits.ca address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4 tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114   fax: +1 604 605 096

Re: Router VM peaks at ~920 Mbit/s instad of 4000 Mbit/s network offering rate limit

2012-12-04 Thread Bryan Whitehead
What is network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate set to in global settings? Please correct me if I'm wrong about how these global settings work, but I think these values override the templates. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 2:58 AM, Wolfram Schlich wrote: > Hi! > > Does a router VM have

Re: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
That would be great, perhaps a link (sidebar) or page on the website incubator.apache.org/cloudstack as well? On 04-Dec-2012, at 11:08 AM, "Kelcey Damage (BBITS)" wrote: > I think it sounds great +1 > > KELCEY DAMAGE > Infrastructure Systems Architect > www.backbonetechnology.com >

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8248/#review14023 --- I like the idea that this script can be provided as a convenience to

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-582) Cannot perform password reset for Windows instances on VMWare

2012-12-04 Thread Bill Rich (JIRA)
Bill Rich created CLOUDSTACK-582: Summary: Cannot perform password reset for Windows instances on VMWare Key: CLOUDSTACK-582 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-582 Project: CloudSta

Re: Marketing and a "who uses it" list

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:11:51PM +0530, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > Greetings. > > A quick bit of background, esp. as I'm effectively a "long time reader, > first time poster" - I attended the collaboration conference over the past > weekend, became involved in a discussion about ways to market an o

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Jie Feng (JIRA)
Jie Feng created CLOUDSTACK-583: --- Summary: Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI Key: CLOUDSTACK-583 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
> > Please go through the api fs proposal. Suggestions, proposals, feedback, > flames? > Sorry for not going through this earlier. The unit tests and testing in general concern me. So let me ask - what is the plan to test that the refactored API behaves the same as the current API? --David

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Sonny Chhen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-583: -- Assignee: Brian Federle > Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including

cloud-setup-databases: How to run script when building in dev environment

2012-12-04 Thread Navina Ramesh
Hi, I had built cloudstack4.0 from source and had setup the database. Due to some problems with MySQL server, I had to drop all the cloudstack related databases. How do I restore them to initial setup? I tried running ~/incubator-cloudstack/setup/bindir/cloud-setup-databases.in from command lin

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-583) Expose Service Offerings and Zone options (including UUID) to users in the CloudStack UI

2012-12-04 Thread Jie Feng (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509978#comment-13509978 ] Jie Feng commented on CLOUDSTACK-583: - Forgot to mention that service offering is

[DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks, I'd like to propose that we change the commit message subject line from: git commit: $short_commit_msg to: git commit: $branch - $short_commit_msg Any other opinions? --David

RE: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Yes prefixing with branch makes it easier to process the message -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 12:36 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines Hi folks,

RE: cloud-setup-databases: How to run script when building in dev environment

2012-12-04 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Use mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb -Original Message- From: Navina Ramesh [mailto:rnav...@acis.ufl.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 12:02 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: cloud-setup-databases: How to run sc

RE: Review Request: Utility for generating the .tx/config file

2012-12-04 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
If we don't need length control, then it would become a non-issue. If only 5 are over 50 CHAR, then maybe we could change those 5 by hand. And institute a 50 CHAR max. This would make things more readable then clipping and suffixing. Let me know how you guys want to approach this. On the other n

Re: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Should I add this to the summary line on the prepare-commit-msg commit hook? Or should it be a separate line such as: Summary: Detail: Branch: Reviewed-by: Signed-off-by: On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > s prefixing with branch makes

Re: Review Request: cs-bugtool implementation, new troubleshooting tool dedicated for collecting CS logs and basic system information

2012-12-04 Thread Radoslaw Smigielski
> On Dec. 4, 2012, 7:29 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I like the idea that this script can be provided as a convenience to > > collect various logs. One problem however is that the script assumes root > > access on the management server and executes a bunch of commands (ip > > routes, ho

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Andrew Bayer
Seems to me that coming up with a general API validation test suite (using jclouds, Marvin, whatever) that verifies consistency of behavior across API versions would be a very handy thing to have. A. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:52 AM, David Nalley wrote: > > > > Please go through the api fs propo

Re: API refactoring work for 4.1.0

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Yes, there will if we finish this work, but not within CS mgmt server itself. CloudStack api server should not become a load balance or a web server, it would be a servlet running in any container like jetty, tomcat or jboss. Such endpoints can be configured to proxy traffic to multiple api serv

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Duncan Johnston-Watt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13508308#comment-13508308 ] Duncan Johnston-Watt edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-576 at 12/4/12 9:53 PM: --

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Any idea on how to upgrade xen on Devcloud (= VB running Devian Wheezy + Xen 4.1) ? On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Ah...Didn't realize you're using devCloud. Anthony is right in another > email. This is most likely due to a mismatch between the xapi java stub > library yo

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Edison Su
I think I made a big mistake using Ubuntu xen in devcloud, which gives us a lot of troubles. I know Marcus is using qemu in devcloud, is it good? > -Original Message- > From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch0...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 2:09 PM > To: cloudstack-dev > Subj

Re: Router VM peaks at ~920 Mbit/s instad of 4000 Mbit/s network offering rate limit

2012-12-04 Thread Andrew Son
The network throughput mostly depends on your hardware configuration, instead of cloudstack. The key components are - Network card : intel ixgbe or broadcom ? - Network device driver version - Network device driver configuration : GRO - using VLAN or not : - using linux bridge or not If you have

master branch build problem

2012-12-04 Thread Fang Wang
Hi all, Does any one have the similar problem? I am building the latest master branch on Windows platform (with Cygwin), and build failed with the errors: [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools: marvin . FAILURE [0.158s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Developer Tools: cloudmonkey cli SKIPP

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Mice Xia
It's great. *resizeVolume* and *dynamicNicManmagement*, these features are very welcomed and i have seen a lot of use cases in traditional environment (pirvate cloud). By the way, what's the progress of *resizeVolume*? last time i saw it, it only supported KVM. -Mice 2012/12/4 Marcus Sorensen :

Re: master branch build problem

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
Marvin install requires python to be installed and in the path for maven to find it. If you are not using marvin don't use the 'developer' profile, simply do mvn clean install. On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 06:51:10AM +0530, Fang Wang wrote: > Hi all, > > Does any one have the similar problem? I am bui

Re: 'traditional' workload patches

2012-12-04 Thread Marcus Sorensen
That's still the case, I'm not familiar enough with the XAPI to write the CitrixResource portion, but I imagine it would be next to trivial once all of the server portions are there and the KVM implementation is in place to use as a reference. That's assuming that resizing is actually exposed on th

Re: master branch build problem

2012-12-04 Thread howie...@trend.com.tw
Hi Fang I have similar problems. If I follow the instruction on the web site. To compile Apache CloudStack, go to the cloudstack source folder and run: mvn -P developer clean install To deploy Apache CloudStack, run: mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb Deploy the database ne

Re: Welcome wagon

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Welcome Brian! Grab the source code, start hacking and reach out to folks on ML and IRC. Post patches via the review board and start earning karma points :) Regards. On 04-Dec-2012, at 5:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I'd like to introduce you guys to Brian Angus. We hired him to help me with

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-584) typos in "Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US"

2012-12-04 Thread Tian Siyuan (JIRA)
Tian Siyuan created CLOUDSTACK-584: -- Summary: typos in "Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US" Key: CLOUDSTACK-584 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-584

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-584) typos in "Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US"

2012-12-04 Thread Tian Siyuan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510224#comment-13510224 ] Tian Siyuan commented on CLOUDSTACK-584: I created a patch as below to fix thi

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-584) typos in "Apache_CloudStack-4.0.0-incubating-CloudStack_Nicira_NVP_Guide-en-US"

2012-12-04 Thread Tian Siyuan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tian Siyuan updated CLOUDSTACK-584: --- Attachment: 0001-Correct-some-typo-in-the-.xml-files-included-in.patch patch attached.

Re: [ASF CS 4.0.1] 4.0.1 Builds to start testing

2012-12-04 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 12:00:42AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > > Sailaja > > > > Log defect and mark it as blocker for 4.0.1 release if this is not > > done yet. > > Sure I'll fix the binary - but these are just convenie

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Rajesh Battala (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510229#comment-13510229 ] Rajesh Battala commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- Is this similar to vApps suppor

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Duncan Johnston Watt
Kelcey The reason we presented this as PaaS enablement is that we see this as a distinct but related activity. One that is important to end users/consumers of cloud. Best Duncan On 4 December 2012 09:58, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote: > I am in agreement with this, as a content IaaS provider, I wo

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Duncan Johnston-Watt (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510243#comment-13510243 ] Duncan Johnston-Watt commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: - Kelcey The reason

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510257#comment-13510257 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- Sorry, don't get me wro

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-553) SRX - When adding SRX device make "Public Network" - default to "untrusted" and "Private Network" - default to "trusted" as un-editable fields.

2012-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joe Brockmeier updated CLOUDSTACK-553: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1) 4.1.0 > SRX - When adding SR

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelcey Damage (BBITS)
I also failed to properly read your original mailer where you state vApp and VMware style feature. I currently have a vCloud and yes those are very useful features. -kd -Original Message- From: Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:23 PM

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

2012-12-04 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13510265#comment-13510265 ] Kelceydamage@bbits commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: --- I also failed to proper

Re: [Discuss] Style Guide for Apache CloudStack Documentation ?

2012-12-04 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:41:06PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hello Community, > > Any thoughts on the need of a style guide for the CloudStack Documentation ? Any project of sufficient size probably needs at least a rudimentary style guide. > First of all, do we need one-If yes, do w

Re: [DISCUSS] changing the format of commit message subject lines

2012-12-04 Thread prasanna
On 5 December 2012 02:05, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to propose that we change the commit message subject line from: > > git commit: $short_commit_msg > > to: > > git commit: $branch - $short_commit_msg > > Any other opinions? Not against the idea but how would this be used? I c

RE: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion

2012-12-04 Thread Devdeep Singh
> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:44 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion > > > 2. Update the java bindings that are used by CloudStack for mak

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Hi Edison, Anthony, Rohit, The new DevCloud2 image (http://rohityadav.in/logs/devcloud/) runs on Debian - Wheezy ( http://people.apache.org/~bhaisaab/cloudstack/devcloud/devcloud2.ova) and not anymore like DevCloud1 (http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/DevCloud) on Ubuntu (http://download.clou

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Charles, I'm not sure why you want to do that? I think I may have a way to get it work with Ubuntu, just that it failed for a number of reasons and worked perfectly with Wheezy. My view is that Debian has higher a security and test standards for their releases. (note: systemvms are also made out

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
Hi Rohit, I don't want to do something else but I have issues (MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy: ..) when I try to create a new instance in the management server of CloudStack using CentOs instead of by default linux kernel proposed. I run the project like Sebastien ( http://s

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Charles, alright you can try to create a light weight linux template using damn small linux, gentoo or a configurable archlinux as an instance using an ISO. If you want to really use CentOS, you should increase the RAM and maybe attach an additional disk via vbox, you may also try a KVM setup wi

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
The reason why I have tried to deploy CentOS is that I'm not sure that with the small linux image that we provide(cloudstack) I can deploy my Apache karaf runtime (fabric project) which requires JDK 6 and at least 500Mb of RAM. On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Charles, alri

RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
Are you serious, you want to run a prod. level env. setup (karaf on the vm with 500MB RAM) on a vm running on a 2G RAM (does not help even if you increase ram or disk) devcloud running on virtualbox/kvm? Get a real host maybe? DevCloud is limited and a good alternative for (offline or infra-def

Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:

2012-12-04 Thread Charles Moulliard
The VirtualBox on my machine has 4GB and I try to use Cloudstack to finalize tests to deploy karaf runtime in the cloud ( http://fuse.fusesource.org/fabric/docs/fabric-cloud-containers.html). Tests already succeeded with OpenStack Essex on my MacBook pro using a comparable config. So I don't really