I am in agreement with this, as a content IaaS provider, I would not want 
integration to go so far as to cloud or obfuscate the IaaS systems in favor of 
PaaS. To me they are 2 distinct and seperate methodologies. I do like PaaS, and 
would think it more of an opportunity for an add on system it layer.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 4, 2012, at 9:43 AM, "John Burwell (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote:

> 
>    [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509892#comment-13509892
>  ] 
> 
> John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
> -----------------------------------------
> 
> Alex,
> 
> My thought is a PaaS would be implemented in a manner akin to BareMetal 
> whereby an SPI would be provided to direct the allocation of resources 
> (compute, storage, and network) to one or more PaaS instances.  CloudStack 
> would provide a common authentication and authorization layer allowing 
> providers to provide a single set of credentials that would operate across 
> IaaS and PaaS offerings, normalized monitoring and metrics collection, and 
> some level UI embedding/theming to provide a consistent user experience 
> between the two management console.  The actual configuration of the PaaS for 
> administrators and users would be delegated to the PaaS and associated system 
> tools (e.g. Puppet, Chef, etc).  In my opinion, attempting any deeper 
> integration would create undue maintenance burden for the CloudStack project 
> while compromising flexibility for operators -- without providing any 
> additional value for either.
> 
> Thanks,
> -John
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> 
>>                Key: CLOUDSTACK-576
>>                URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576
>>            Project: CloudStack
>>         Issue Type: New Feature
>>     Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
>> default.) 
>>         Components: API, AWSAPI
>>           Reporter: Duncan Johnston-Watt
>> 
>> Given the level of interest in CloudStack as a platform for private, hybrid 
>> and public cloud one of the gaps is support for composite/multi-tier 
>> application blueprints comparable to VMware vApp and CloudFormation 
>> templates without necessarily slavishly following either of them. This is 
>> almost certainly a new component. One that will leverage/enhance the 
>> API/AWSAPI components amongst others.
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to