[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13509883#comment-13509883
 ] 

Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576:
------------------------------------------


John,

+1 && thanks for the idea.

I'm a big fan of OpenShift.  I think that should definitely be a 
supported deployment tech.  We've done similar (lightweight isolation) 
with LXC at one of our customers.

So the question is whether things like this should be a native option? 
  Or do we aim to be general enough so cartridges/recipes/etc can all 
easily be leveraged?  I'm thinking the latter, then with a library of 
examples for using OpenShift, Puppet, etc etc, which people can copy and 
tweak.

--A




                
> PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-576
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: API, AWSAPI
>            Reporter: Duncan Johnston-Watt
>
> Given the level of interest in CloudStack as a platform for private, hybrid 
> and public cloud one of the gaps is support for composite/multi-tier 
> application blueprints comparable to VMware vApp and CloudFormation templates 
> without necessarily slavishly following either of them. This is almost 
> certainly a new component. One that will leverage/enhance the API/AWSAPI 
> components amongst others.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to