[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-525) Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues both MASTER.

Alex Mathiasen created CLOUDSTACK-525: - Summary: Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues both MASTER. Key: CLOUDSTACK-525 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-525 Project: Clou

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-525) Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues both MASTER.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13501765#comment-13501765 ] Alex Mathiasen commented on CLOUDSTACK-525: --- The network offering is created

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-526) Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues with Port Forwarding

Alex Mathiasen created CLOUDSTACK-526: - Summary: Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues with Port Forwarding Key: CLOUDSTACK-526 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-526 Proje

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-526) Cloudstack Redundant Virtual Router issues with Port Forwarding

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13501767#comment-13501767 ] Alex Mathiasen commented on CLOUDSTACK-526: --- The network offering is created

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-396) Install Guide: Section 10.1 (AWS EC2 Compat Interface): mentions that you can only get the API to work in a fresh install

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13501801#comment-13501801 ] sebastien goasguen commented on CLOUDSTACK-396: --- Chip, that's because "C

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-54) awsapi contains (more) deprecated docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen updated CLOUDSTACK-54: - Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress) > awsapi contains (more) depre

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-54) awsapi contains (more) deprecated docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13501802#comment-13501802 ] sebastien goasguen commented on CLOUDSTACK-54: -- I am closing this, since w

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-54) awsapi contains (more) deprecated docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-54?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sebastien goasguen resolved CLOUDSTACK-54. -- Resolution: Duplicate Additional work filed in cloudstack-464

Review Request: CentOS rpm build fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8166/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Description --- The jenkins build http://jen

Re: Review Request: CentOS rpm build fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8166/#review13665 --- The spec file in the top directory still depends on the old ant build

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging going forward

On 11/21/2012 01:18 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey all, Packaging is a work in progress at the moment. Wido, me and others are working on this, but we are not there yet. Partially this is because there are a multitude of things to consider when we discuss packaging. Hence this mail to share

Re: Planning the Next CloudStack Conference

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > Just bumping this thread. A couple of folks expressed concern about the > proximity of the suggested dates w/r/t the 4.2 schedule. However: > > 1) With a time-based release cycle is this a blocker? IMO, no, but it will distract

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-396) Install Guide: Section 10.1 (AWS EC2 Compat Interface): mentions that you can only get the API to work in a fresh install

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers closed CLOUDSTACK-396. Resolution: Invalid Per our discussions, this bug is invalid. > Instal

Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master?

Where can I access the appropriate Netscaler jar? I'd like to test the module with the new additions, and the jar that I have from prior to the 4.0 release doesn't have several of the referenced classes. On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Ram Ganesh wrote: > Any thoughts? Unless we hear otherwise

Access to builds.apache.org

Can someone with the appropriate rights / karma please give me an account on builds.a.o to help manage the cloudstack build config? -chip

RE: Integrating autoscale branch to master?

Is someone hosting the non-oss jars in a single place, I can share the latest NetScaler jar file and we can update the repository(ies). Thanks, Vijay. > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 10:13 PM > To: cloudst

Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master?

Not in an "official" way really, but my question was actually from a user perspective. How would I get the jar from Citrix? On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > > Is someone hosting the non-oss jars in a single place, I can share the latest > NetScaler jar file and we

Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master?

It does look like Wido is hosting the jars here: http://zooi.widodh.nl/cloudstack/build-dep/ I found that link on this wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote: > > Is someone hosti

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-527) List API performance optimization by using DB views

Min Chen created CLOUDSTACK-527: --- Summary: List API performance optimization by using DB views Key: CLOUDSTACK-527 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-527 Project: CloudStack

Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8172/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- This is par

Re: Can we still use DevCloud VM Image ?

Do I have to copy this script (cloud-install-sys-tmplt) from the guest machine where I build cloudstack 4.1-SNAPSHOT project to the host (= virtualbox running ubuntu where Xen server + NFS server) ? On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Prasanna Santhanam < prasanna.santha...@citrix.com> wrote: > This

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-524) http proxy used by ssvm (secstorage.proxy) NOT working

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13502220#comment-13502220 ] ilya musayev commented on CLOUDSTACK-524: - I raised the same issue on cloudsta

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging going forward

On 11/20/2012 12:18 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey all, Packaging is a work in progress at the moment. Wido, me and others are working on this, but we are not there yet. Partially this is because there are a multitude of things to consider when we discuss packaging. Hence this mail to share a

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

Hi folks: Just a heads up on where I currently stand before the holidays in the US begin. I have master building and they run unit tests - and also cobertura is reporting coverage reports in that job. https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-master-maven/ I also have the RAT job running here: ht

RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

David I certainly vote +1 on your ideas to improve testing in CS and enhancing and embracing automation as way of life. To put in my two cents , I would like to highlight that unit test automation is the base for automation strategy. Here is a good post on test pyramid http://martinfowle

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > David > > I certainly vote +1 on your ideas to improve testing in CS and enhancing > and embracing automation as way of life. To put in my two cents , I would > like to highlight that unit test automa

RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

Thanks for the report David. Gives good baseline for pre 4.1 Lot of scope to add unit tests https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-master-maven/13/cobertura/ -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 3:39 PM To: cloudstack-dev@i

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8172/#review13683 --- api/src/com/cloud/api/view/vo/IControlledViewEntity.java

RE: Review Request: Changed the @Parameter for some VM group commands.

I'll update the FS doc. Alex and I had a discussion, and for the @parameter, the entityType annotation for the REST API is a response class object. For example, @Parameter(name=ApiConstants.DOMAIN_ID, type=CommandType.LONG, required=true, description="domain id of the new VM owner.", ent

RE: [DISCUSS] API refactoring spec

I am currently working on the 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 annotation changes in the FS. I am grouping the APIs into sub groups, for example, a VM subgroup handles all the virtual machine related APIs. For 3.2.1, we may change the entityType be to the object of a response class, to present to the REST API

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

> On Nov. 22, 2012, 12:05 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > utils/src/com/cloud/utils/db/GenericDaoBase.java, line 1811 > > > > > > this change seems unrelated? perhaps it needs a new bug? SQL statement used here to g

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8172/#review13685 --- Looks good to me apart from changing interface name to match current

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:47 PM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks: > > Just a heads up on where I currently stand before the holidays in the US > begin. > I have master building and they run unit tests - and also cobertura is > reporting coverage reports in that job. > > https://builds.apache.org/jo

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:38 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> David >> >> I certainly vote +1 on your ideas to improve testing in CS and enhancing >> and embracing automation as way of life. To put in my

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

> is useful. (But of course, having a set of tests to confirm that the > refactoring didn't break anything should be a prerequisite to making > that sort of change! I was thinking the same thing when reading Chiradeeps review on Min's patch. We should start with a set of tests that pass cleanly w

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

>> On Nov. 22, 2012, 12:05 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 3006 >> > >> > >> > this is a major piece of surgery on this method. How are you sure that >> > the befo

RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 5:17 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1 > is useful. (But of course, having a set of tests to confirm that the > refactoring didn't break anything should be a prerequisite

RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

If defect fixes include unit tests, some legacy code can be covered. -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 6:18 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1 From:

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

> On Nov. 22, 2012, 12:33 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > Looks good to me apart from changing interface name to match current format > > - Also all our VO's refer zoneId as datacenterId - can we keep it uniform > > in the views as well. > > Are we changing the ListVMsCmd and ListRoutersCmd to no

Re: Review Request: List API performance optimization part I.

That is a good idea for such API refactoring efforts mentioned in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+refac toring, since these work will touch every API, not just list API since it involves refactoring all Response objects to remove IdentityMapper and thus other c

RE: Integrating autoscale branch to master?

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 21 November 2012 23:10 > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master? > > Not in an "official" way really, but my question was actually from a > user pers

Review Request: Documentation for the new features: Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone and User-provided hostname in vCenter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8180/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati, Jessica Tomec