On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > Hey all, > > Just bumping this thread. A couple of folks expressed concern about the > proximity of the suggested dates w/r/t the 4.2 schedule. However: > > 1) With a time-based release cycle is this a blocker?
IMO, no, but it will distract from testing obviously. I think we can work around it though. > 2) If so, suggestions for alternate dates? (Please bear in mind other > events like Linux Foundation End Users Conference, Collab > Summit/CloudOpen, etc.) > > Ideally we would nail down a date for the next event before the > conference next week takes place. > > Also - it'd be great to have as many committers/PPMC folks at the event > as possible. So if anybody's going to be unavailable during a specific > time in the Spring, now'd be a good time to speak up. We probably > wouldn't avoid a date for just one person, but if four or five people > are going to be out that'd be good to know now. I can barely schedule my life one month out... so who knows ;-) > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012, at 07:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:30PM -0800, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: >> > It might be nice to push it till closer to 4.2 release schedule, so we can >> > use part of the conference to discuss and present new features, changes. >> >> Define "closer". ;-) (Actually, suggest dates.) >> >> With a time-based release, is this as important? I mean - I assume we'll >> always be working on features, changes, etc. We're not holding releases >> for specific features, so shouldn't we be able to discuss and present >> ideas / features at almost any time? >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier >> Twitter: @jzb >> http://dissociatedpress.net/ > > > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >
