gt; especially in terms of any obvious "download this product" pages.
>
> Without having read all of this thread yet or understanding exactly what
> kind of software is there, my first unofficial reaction would be that if
> the (P)PMC doesn't explicitly disapprove of the "
&g
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Noa Resare wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> github.com/CloudStack needs to change its account name to something
>> that is less confusing.
>>
>>
> I'm unsure about how this relates to
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> github.com/CloudStack needs to change its account name to something
> that is less confusing.
>
>
I'm unsure about how this relates to the rest of the discussion, but to me
github has proven to be a useful mechanism for m
y in terms of any obvious "download this product" pages.
Without having read all of this thread yet or understanding exactly what
kind of software is there, my first unofficial reaction would be that if
the (P)PMC doesn't explicitly disapprove of the
"github.com/cloudstack-extras&qu
something
> >
> >
> > I did.
>
> Forgive me for disagreeing - but there was nothing remotely negative
> about your response.
> http://markmail.org/message/qs5wt2ucjjdj4tfp
>
> You said you were looping in someone else - expanding the audience,
> not a bad thing -
or disagreeing - but there was nothing remotely negative
about your response.
http://markmail.org/message/qs5wt2ucjjdj4tfp
You said you were looping in someone else - expanding the audience,
not a bad thing - there was no indication that you thought that.
One of the things you indicated was problema
estions. I guess he was busy too.
> How long should I have waited?
I don't know. But following up was another option. Sometimes emails get
lost in the noise. After 6 days you posted a note to say you were going to
go ahead and name the repos. You assumed lazy consensus, but I think my
pr
uld I have waited? I could have left this as
github.com/cloudstack and not spent the time and energy to make the
move, blog about it, notify the many people who this move affects etc.
While I seek to make sure we do what is best for the project, it's
exhausting to try and comply with the demands, on
ng this is managed by Citrix.)
- The https://github.com/CloudStack-extras/CloudStack repository still
lists itself as "CloudStack OSS Cloud.com/community - IaaS (Infrastructure
as a Service)" which is confusing and makes it sound like this is the Git
repository for Apache CloudStack.
AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> David, I have looped in our VP of Brand Management to assist us here.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks, following up on an older thread:
>>>
>>> github.com/CloudStack needs to change i
, David Nalley wrote:
>
>> Hi folks, following up on an older thread:
>>
>> github.com/CloudStack needs to change its account name to something
>> that is less confusing.
>>
>> There are 18 repos in this account - about 1/2 of them still useful -
>> a few
David, I have looped in our VP of Brand Management to assist us here.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks, following up on an older thread:
>
> github.com/CloudStack needs to change its account name to something
> that is less confusing.
>
> The
Hi folks, following up on an older thread:
github.com/CloudStack needs to change its account name to something
that is less confusing.
There are 18 repos in this account - about 1/2 of them still useful -
a few of the others need to stay around because of the provisions of
the GPL.
Many of
13 matches
Mail list logo
