On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 05:42:55PM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the check-ins,
> I think there are some confusion on when to and what to write in a unit test.
>
> Unit tests are a philosophy thing and I usually stay away from things like
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:12:55AM +0530, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the
> check-ins, I think there are some confusion on when to and what to
> write in a unit test.
>
Not just unit-tests alone, most testing in general. There was an
insightfu
On 03/06/2013 02:42 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the check-ins, I
think there are some confusion on when to and what to write in a unit test.
Unit tests are a philosophy thing and I usually stay away from things like
that. If you are inte
+1 to fostering guruism.
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> With the discussion in the BVT thread and other evidence from the
> check-ins, I think there are some confusion on when to and what to write in
> a unit test.
>
> Unit tests are a philosophy thing and I usually stay aw
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 10:35 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unit Tests for LoadBalancer functionality in ASF Master
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rajesh Battala
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have almost done with my feature (AWS Style healthchecks for NetScaler).
> I have got paused, how to write unit tests for healthchecks.
>
> Under cloud-server/test I didn't find any tests for LoadBalancer. There are
> not un
oard, once it is reviewed and committed the
>>> structure will be set and all the units already written are in the new
>>> structure.
>>>
>>> Mani
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
&g
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:19 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 9:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> > >> 2 - Do we want to get stricter about what exactly is considered t
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:34 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unit tests
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > +1 the more tests
x.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:24 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:19 PM
>>
On 10 November 2012 03:03, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> +1 the more tests the merrier.
>>
>> I have noticed that in master doing mvn install actually runs some unit
>> tests. I don't like that because it slows down compilation. I haven't
>> track
On 10 November 2012 03:03, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> +1 the more tests the merrier.
>>
>> I have noticed that in master doing mvn install actually runs some unit
>> tests. I don't like that because it slows down compilation. I haven't
>> track
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> +1 the more tests the merrier.
>
> I have noticed that in master doing mvn install actually runs some unit
> tests. I don't like that because it slows down compilation. I haven't track
> down exactly what it is but I think it's in the nicira
: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit tests
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> > >>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 12:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> > >> 2 - Do we want to get stricter about what exactly is considered t
> >> 2 - Do we want to get stricter about what exactly is considered to be
> >> a unit test (vs an automated test that may or may not be based on the
> >> junit framework)?
> >
> > I actually consider db tests to be unit tests as long as the db is setup and
> cleaned up by the unit test itself.
>
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>>
>> 1 - Do we want tests to run each time mvn install is run?
>
> No. I like to have choices.
>
>>
>> 2 - Do we want to get stricter about what exactly is considered to be
>> a unit test (vs an automated test that may or may not be based on the
>
> 1 - Do we want tests to run each time mvn install is run?
No. I like to have choices.
>
> 2 - Do we want to get stricter about what exactly is considered to be
> a unit test (vs an automated test that may or may not be based on the
> junit framework)?
I actually consider db tests to be un
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:21 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Unit tests
>>
>> I'd like to drop this branch (after moving completed tests over to
>> master). The reason that I created it was to specifically avoid
>>
-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 11:21 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Unit tests
>
> I'd like to drop this branch (after moving completed tests over to
> master). The reason
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> I'd like to drop this branch (after moving completed tests over to
> master). The reason that I created it was to specifically avoid
> messing up the 4.0 work. Since we've moved on already, any issues
> integrating the new tests into master?
e-
>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:31 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>>
>> Matthew,
>>
>> Are you looking to write unit tests for which set of APIs? I
October 30, 2012 9:31 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> Matthew,
>
> Are you looking to write unit tests for which set of APIs? Is it the
> management server APIs, plugin APIs, or resource APIs?
>
> Yup. Hugo's path is the corr
Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:31 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit tests
Matthew,
Are you looking to write unit tests for which set of APIs? Is it the
management server APIs, plugin APIs, or resource APIs
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 8:02 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> Hey Matthew,
>
> Go go go !
>
> Put please put the tests in /test/com/cloud/ That
> would keep it compatible with the existing location for unit tests
Done and done. I'll start work ASAP :)
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Hugo Trippaers <
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> Hey Matthew,
>
> Go go go !
>
> Put please put the tests in /test/com/cloud/ That
> would keep it compatible with the existing location for unit tests and make
> i
Hey Matthew,
Go go go !
Put please put the tests in /test/com/cloud/ That would
keep it compatible with the existing location for unit tests and make it work
with maven right away :-)
Cheers,
HUgo
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Morrissey [mailto:matthew.morris...@sungard.co
> > We can speed up the tests. Just never got to have marvin drive
> > everything asynchronously.It's been on my TODO list forever now as
> > have the API tests. I for one would be extremely happy to see some.
>
> I am gonna look into the speed up. Where you thinking of threading
> it or using nos
On Sep 18, 2012, at 6:53 PM, prasanna wrote:
> On 18 September 2012 18:20, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>> First, thanks for working on test stuff, we really need more automate test
>>> cases.
>>> If you plan to work on the API test, we have a pyth
Prasanna:
It is my fault. I installed the wrong marvin package.
Yichi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, prasanna wrote:
> Sorry jclouds has a cloudstack suite for advanced zone as well. Not
> just ec2. cloudstack-ec2 is to test the ec2 shim of cloudstack.
>
> On 18 September 2012 22:23, prasan
Sorry jclouds has a cloudstack suite for advanced zone as well. Not
just ec2. cloudstack-ec2 is to test the ec2 shim of cloudstack.
On 18 September 2012 22:23, prasanna wrote:
> On 18 September 2012 18:20, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>> First, thank
On 18 September 2012 18:20, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>> First, thanks for working on test stuff, we really need more automate test
>> cases.
>> If you plan to work on the API test, we have a python test framework:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDS
Yichi - I think you've got a completely different marvin from the
cheeseshop here: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/marvin/0.6.2
What you need is this: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-marvin-master/
DId the documentation mislead you somehwere?
On 18 September 2012 21:57, Yichi Lu wrote:
> S
I think so. JUnit probably is a better way at this point.
Yichi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Yichi,
>
> Would more traditional unit tests (using JUnit and moc'ed
> dependencies) perhaps be a better way to get to unit test coverage?
> (As opposed to other automated tes
Yichi,
Would more traditional unit tests (using JUnit and moc'ed
dependencies) perhaps be a better way to get to unit test coverage?
(As opposed to other automated test types)
-chip
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Yichi Lu wrote:
> So I folllowed the doc:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK
So I folllowed the doc:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/testing-with-python.html, and tried to
install marvin to my 64 bit MacBook, OS: Lion. I installed marvin.0.6.2,
and also biopython-1.59
because:
>>> import marvin
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "/usr/local
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> First, thanks for working on test stuff, we really need more automate test
> cases.
> If you plan to work on the API test, we have a python test framework:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/testing-with-python.html. The most
> compelling f
First, thanks for working on test stuff, we really need more automate test
cases.
If you plan to work on the API test, we have a python test framework:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/testing-with-python.html. The most
compelling feature is that it supports code completion for cloudstack API
+1
Awesome indeed!! Looking forward for it
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:08 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: unit tests for api/src/com/cloud/agent/api
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Yichi Lu
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Yichi Lu wrote:
> I'd start to write unit tests for classes in api/src/com/cloud/agent/api in
> alphabetical order.
>
> Let me know if you have any suggestions.
>
> Yichi Lu
AWESOME - terribly excited to see this!
--David
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 4:27 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Unit tests
>
> +1
> It would be good if patch reviewers can ask for unit tests
Sent: 16 August 2012 13:05
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: Unit tests
>
> Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught
> a valid failure.
>
> On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
>
> >http://jenkins.cloud
16 August 2012 13:05
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: Unit tests
>
> Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught a valid
> failure.
>
> On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
>
> >http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job
Yes, I just noticed this that jenkins is reporting zero unit test
failures. That's awesome!
--David
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught a
> valid failure.
>
> On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
>
Fixed. One of them was obsolete, the other (NetUtils) actually caught a
valid failure.
On 8/10/12 4:36 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote:
>http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/test-junit, by the way.
>
>Ewan.
>
>From: Ewan Mellor
>Sent: 10 August 2012 16:36
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/test-junit, by the way.
Ewan.
From: Ewan Mellor
Sent: 10 August 2012 16:36
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Unit tests
We are down to the last two unit test failures (thanks to Mice for his recent
patch which dealt with two others).
The failure
48 matches
Mail list logo
