On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Just bumping this thread. A couple of folks expressed concern about the
> proximity of the suggested dates w/r/t the 4.2 schedule. However:
>
> 1) With a time-based release cycle is this a blocker?
IMO, no, but it will distract
Hey all,
Just bumping this thread. A couple of folks expressed concern about the
proximity of the suggested dates w/r/t the 4.2 schedule. However:
1) With a time-based release cycle is this a blocker?
2) If so, suggestions for alternate dates? (Please bear in mind other
events like Linux Founda
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:30PM -0800, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote:
> It might be nice to push it till closer to 4.2 release schedule, so we can
> use part of the conference to discuss and present new features, changes.
Define "closer". ;-) (Actually, suggest dates.)
With a time-based release
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:45:11PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Per Chips schedule this puts us right in the middle of 4.2 timeline
> (after branching, but before release)
Is that a blocker? On a 4-month cycle, I'm not sure it's imperative
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Planning the Next CloudStack Conference
It might be nice to push it till closer to 4.2 release schedule, so we can use
part of the conference to discuss and present new features, changes.
KELCEY DAMAGE
Infrastructure Systems Architect
www.backbonetechnology.com
@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Planning the Next CloudStack Conference
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> We're just a few weeks out from the first CloudStack conference - so,
> of course, it's time to start thinking about the one after that.
>
> Citrix is willing to
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> We're just a few weeks out from the first CloudStack conference - so, of
> course, it's time to start thinking about the one after that.
>
> Citrix is willing to be a major sponsor for two CloudStack conferences
> in 2013, similar to what we
