Hey all, Just bumping this thread. A couple of folks expressed concern about the proximity of the suggested dates w/r/t the 4.2 schedule. However:
1) With a time-based release cycle is this a blocker? 2) If so, suggestions for alternate dates? (Please bear in mind other events like Linux Foundation End Users Conference, Collab Summit/CloudOpen, etc.) Ideally we would nail down a date for the next event before the conference next week takes place. Also - it'd be great to have as many committers/PPMC folks at the event as possible. So if anybody's going to be unavailable during a specific time in the Spring, now'd be a good time to speak up. We probably wouldn't avoid a date for just one person, but if four or five people are going to be out that'd be good to know now. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012, at 07:45 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 01:31:30PM -0800, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > > It might be nice to push it till closer to 4.2 release schedule, so we can > > use part of the conference to discuss and present new features, changes. > > Define "closer". ;-) (Actually, suggest dates.) > > With a time-based release, is this as important? I mean - I assume we'll > always be working on features, changes, etc. We're not holding releases > for specific features, so shouldn't we be able to discuss and present > ideas / features at almost any time? > -- > Joe Brockmeier > Twitter: @jzb > http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
