Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-08 Thread Weiran Xia
as a user, i prefer 2.2.y UI, though not so fancy, it is efficient. Regards Weiran

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-07 Thread Edison Su
> -Original Message- > From: David Avenante [mailto:d.avena...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 10:26 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX > > Cloudstack UI in a developper point of view. > > Hi, I works

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-07 Thread David Avenante
t; 4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA > > > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:45 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX > > Pluggable UI a

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Clayton Weise
A mixture of both but primarily Android. We haven't tried out Cumulus yet. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:25 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Cl

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Clayton Weise wrote: > None of our techs here ever have, nor have any of our users.  We're much more > likely to use a cell phone than a tablet simply due to the fact that we live > with them all day long.  For us we generally interface with things via > smartpho

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Clayton Weise
ssage- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX So not to overly play devils-advocate - but especially now that there are dedicated Andoid and iPad apps for CloudStack, does anyone use an iP

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Sonny Chhen
June 06, 2012 12:45 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX Pluggable UI and job UI are feature requirements that we need to implement, I guess Sonny would like the feedbacks about general UIX ideas. Maybe I'm a too boring person, I actually like how Microsoft Ou

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Clayton Weise wrote: >>Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that >>was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to >>overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI. > > As mentioned on th

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Clayton Weise
> Customizable display columns in the UI. +1 I think being able to add/remove columns gives a user the ability to decide what's important to them and sort on it. > I don't want to hover over each of the VM to get the information that I am > interested in. I think it's fine to have it pop if yo

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Clayton Weise
>Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that >was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to >overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI. As mentioned on the UIX document on confluence, since the goal is to make it

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Ahmad Emneina
anav >> >>-Original Message- >>From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 1:07 AM >>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX >> >>Hi everyone, >> >>[UI developer here] >

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Anantha Kasetty
ents/3572012/cs_usability.jpg > > >Regards, >Pranav > >-Original Message- >From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 1:07 AM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX > >Hi everyone, &

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Pranav Saxena
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 1:07 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX Hi everyone, [UI developer here] I also agree that the tree structure was one of the most appealing aspects of cloudstack 2.0 . It gives an overview of the architecture straight away wi

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Kelven Yang
2012 12:21 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > > > For CloudStack Admin Console, we need to innovate in the following > areas.  These all have to do with being able to do more

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Pranav Saxena
s been planned as an upcoming requirement. Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 12:51 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: CloudStack UIX > We've thought of adding more toolbar &#

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Chip Childers
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > For CloudStack Admin Console, we need to innovate in the following areas.   > These all have to do with being able to do more with less action. > > - Pluggable UI to configure plugins +1 (would be +5 if it could be) > - A monitor pane where r

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Alex Huang
> We've thought of adding more toolbar 'quick links' or possibly keyboard > shortcuts for frequent users to access their commonly-used functionality. > Ideally these could be customizable and stored in user preferences. Any > other ideas? I think a simple collapsible tree view would be very helpfu

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Brian Federle
[UI developer here] Our primary focus for the UI design for 3.0 was ease of use, since that was a major problem in the 2.0.x UI. In particular, we didn't want to overload/overwhelm a new user with a ton of options when they load the UI. The unfortunate side effect to this is more clicks to get to

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Alex Huang
oudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX > > My US$0.02: > > The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When > actually trying to get things done, though, they just slow me down. In > particular, what gets annoying is when I have to clic

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Matthew Hartmann
Agreed. The current UI design could do with a major revamp, the constant clicking is nothing but annoying. Many of my users have commented on how annoying the interface is, not to mention the complaints I've received about Firewall Rules and Port Forwards not being on the same screen. I like th

RE: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Kelven Yang
day, June 06, 2012 11:47 AM > To: > Subject: Re: CloudStack UIX > > I agree with John re the number of clicks required to get to things, it's > gets very tiring. > > Geoff > > > > On 6 Jun 2012, at 19:44, "John Kinsella" wrote: > > My US$

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread Geoff Higginbottom
I agree with John re the number of clicks required to get to things, it's gets very tiring. Geoff On 6 Jun 2012, at 19:44, "John Kinsella" wrote: My US$0.02: The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When actually trying to get things done, though, they just slo

Re: CloudStack UIX

2012-06-06 Thread John Kinsella
My US$0.02: The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When actually trying to get things done, though, they just slow me down. In particular, what gets annoying is when I have to click through several animations to get to a page, like getting to a CS host (6 clicks)