wrote:
> >> > Yah, the one you mentioned is a simple fix, not a blocker IMHO.
> >> > It only be triggered when there is an race condition: " but indeed there
> >> is a race condition between migrating thread and delta sync thread" from
> >> the commence sen
On Oct 17, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
>> eventually, or is it fine where it is?
>>
>> It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
On Oct 17, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
>> eventually, or is it fine where it is?
>>
>> It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
Danke!
On 17 October 2012 17:28, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :)
> >
> > However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is
> > that if we're treating this as a separate p
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :)
>
> However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is
> that if we're treating this as a separate package, it should include the
> Incubation DISCLAIMER.
Agreed - pu
Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :)
However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is
that if we're treating this as a separate package, it should include the
Incubation DISCLAIMER.
On 17 October 2012 17:07, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
> eventually, or is it fine where it is?
>
> It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
> then?
It might become a sub-project at some point - but
Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
eventually, or is it fine where it is?
It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
then?
On 17 October 2012 16:56, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Hmm.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hmm. Why bother putting the LICENSE.txt or CHANGES.txt there at all? (I
> have never had to deal with a sub-project in the root of a larger project
> at the ASF.) Is it intended to be built out of the source, and
> shipped separately?
>
Yes
Hmm. Why bother putting the LICENSE.txt or CHANGES.txt there at all? (I
have never had to deal with a sub-project in the root of a larger project
at the ASF.) Is it intended to be built out of the source, and
shipped separately?
On 17 October 2012 16:45, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 20
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>>
>> > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt
>> > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt
>> > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in
>>
>> Marvin is a stand-alone tool really. That's why they are there.
>
>
>
On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt
> > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt
> > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in
>
> Marvin is a stand-alone tool really. That's why they are there.
Can you clarify what you mean? I can't find this license in the ro
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a
>> > summary email...
>> >
>> > Looking at
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a
>> > summary email...
>> >
>> > Looking at
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a
> > summary email...
> >
> > Looking at target/rat.txt
> >
> > What are these files doing here:
> >
> >
when there is an race condition: " but indeed there
>> is a race condition between migrating thread and delta sync thread" from
>> the commence send by Mice.
>> > I'll merge a5bca0999aa010252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 into 4.0
>> >
>> >> -
0252b1390c4db6dc5023967ab06 into 4.0
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:45 PM
> >> To: Edison Su
> >> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >&g
[mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:47 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Cc: Marcus Sorensen
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
>>
>> OK - so in reading through this t
.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:47 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Marcus Sorensen
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
>
> OK - so in reading through this thread, I believe we are in a position wher
2 3:13 PM
> To:
> Cc: Marcus Sorensen
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second
> round
>
> Thanks.
>
> Any volunteers to address this issue?
>
> - chip
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Chandan Purusho
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 2:47 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Marcus Sorensen
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
>
> O
Sorensen
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
OK - so in reading through this thread, I believe we are in a position where we
will need to restart the vote again. We are aborting this vote.
I will package up another RC, and start a third round of voting this
23967ab06 into 4.0
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:45 PM
>> To: Edison Su
>> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating R
023967ab06 into 4.0
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:45 PM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second
>
can't create guest VMs on multiple physical bridges.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:53 AM
>> To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: R
gt; don't
> work)
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:59 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Cc: Edison Su
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apa
gards.
From: Edison Su [edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:23 AM
To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
Need to merge another o
us Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:59 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Edison Su
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second
> round
>
> my vote is -1... got stuck in ErrorInMaint
he trouble, it works.
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Edison Su
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:51 PM
> To: Rohit Yadav
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round
>
> Why
se, second round
Why it failed? Any log? The same procedure works for me and chip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:11 AM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.
Why it failed? Any log? The same procedure works for me and chip.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:11 AM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Relea
0
-f '
This remove the build/override/templates.sql, so when I do ant rdeploydb, it
fails.
Regards.
From: Edison Su
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:20 PM
To: Rohit Yadav
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Clouds
Rdeploydb will recreate db in devcloud, right? It's documented in the test
procedure.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:15 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
> Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the
> override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. r
Hi,
Validated using Rhel 6.3 OSS build with hypervisor Xen 6.0.2 .
Basic , Advanced Zone Configuration and VM Life Cycle operations are
validated using the build @ CloudStack-oss-4.0.0-701.tar .
My vote is +1 .
Thanks and Regards,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers
Another issue I found was that we're cleaning DevCloud, which cleans the
override/templates.sql, pl. make a backup of it. And, pl. rdeploydb to start
afresh, your old devcloud image will have old database (3.x) which will be
failed by DatabaseUpgradeChecker upon ant rdebug.
Edison, can we crea
Okay, I re-read the logs and found the issues:
1. If you're using PPA: natecarlson/maven3, we will have to use mvn3, so mvn3
-P deps. Updated the 4.0 test procedure wiki.
2. Since, we've moved from ant and we clean the repository in Test the Build
section. This cleans up target and dist folder
I'm offline in a all day meeting. Can someone help Noah please?
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 16, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same
> error.
>
> Chip, can you advise please?
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, N
I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same
error.
Chip, can you advise please?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style.
>
> This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into
I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style.
This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into the VM.
Do these comments still apply? (Should we document them?)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 16-Oct-2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater w
On 16-Oct-2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Now I have this error:
>
> $ ant rdeploy
> Buildfile:
> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml
> [echo] Using build parameters from
> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build
Did you clean up:
rm -Rf ~/.m2
ssh root@localhost -p 'cd /opt/cloudstack/; rm -rf apache-tomcat-6.0.32;
unzip apache-tomcat-6.0.32.zip; cd incubator-cloudstack; git clean -f; git
reset --hard; git pull --rebase; git clean -f; git checkout origin/4.0 -b 4.0
-f '
On Oct 16, 2012, at 2:18
Now I have this error:
$ ant rdeploy
Buildfile:
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml
[echo] Using build parameters from
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build-cloud.properties
[echo] Using company info from
/private/
Thanks, downloading the binary distribution of Ant and manually copying
ant-jsch.jar worked for me. I have updated the wiki.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> I followed this:
>
> http://myvirtual-lab.blogspot.com.es/2009/07/ant-scp-and-ec2.html
>
> with updated version
I followed this:
http://myvirtual-lab.blogspot.com.es/2009/07/ant-scp-and-ec2.html
with updated versions..
On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> $ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10
> /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
>
>
>
$ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10
/usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
--
NS
Did you follow the install Jsch directions ?
It's an OSX issue.
-sebastien
On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating (second round).
>
> We encourage the whole community to downloa
I am running into an error, and would appreciate guidance.
$ ant rdeploy
Buildfile:
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml
[echo] Using build parameters from
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build-cloud.properties
[ech
On 14-Oct-2012, at 9:45 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Rohit:
>
> Can you make sure a bug gets filed so that these are listed as
> requires or build requires?
Sure, done: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-343
>
> --David
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
Rohit:
Can you make sure a bug gets filed so that these are listed as
requires or buildrequires?
--David
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> +1
>
> Tested on Ubuntu 12.04
>
> Corrected the building/packaging wiki; [0]
> For debian packaging make sure you've following preinsta
+1
Tested on Ubuntu 12.04
Corrected the building/packaging wiki; [0]
For debian packaging make sure you've following preinstalled:
aptitude dpkg-dev debhelper tomcat6 libws-commons-util-java python-mysqldb
(for installation via install.sh, aptitude should be installed)
- No build, packaging, or
+1
Followed test procedure on 10.8.1 macbook air, (skipped md5, git comparison),
started/destroyed instance via GUI. started/destroyed instance via python boto,
describe images via SOAP, terminated instance via SOAP. Happy :)
-sebastien
On Oct 14, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi
51 matches
Mail list logo
