P.S. I would caveat that personally identifying information about our users
should obviously not be shared. ;)
On 14 November 2012 15:25, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > I don't know what type of data you will get with Pwiki. But t
This proposal has me confused.
Why would any data at all be considered private? And private to whom?
There is no "us" and "them" in this project. We are one community. The only
thing that separates the PMC and committers from any other subscribers to
this list is a little bit more trust to undert
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> I don't know what type of data you will get with Pwiki. But the default
> google analytics does not reveal too much about users. countries from
> IP geolocation…i don't even think you have page statistics on a per
> user basis..
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:43:37AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> > Still no expectation on what folks are going
On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>> Still no expectation on what folks are going to b
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Still no expectation on what folks are going to be able to do with the
> > data. Is it considered private,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:29:31PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> Ok. Why can't we give access to all the contributors ? Why restricting to
> committers only ?
Who are "all the contributors"? ;-)
Committership is well-defined, and it confers access to git, SVN, etc.
and it's a reasonable th
stack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Analytics
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:14:45PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Could you give access to the Piwik stats on Documentation for all the
> doc contributors?
I would rather not get into a case-
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:14:45PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Could you give access to the Piwik stats on Documentation for all the
> doc contributors?
I would rather not get into a case-by-case situation.
> We can also think about having a "Leave a Comment" mechanism on th
2, 2012 9:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Analytics
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Following up on the discussion last week (see:
> &
Great to know we are setting up pwiki.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 9:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal: Analytics
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Following up on the discussion last week (see:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/jygtlrxv7pfgoumr)
> >
> > I raised the topic of analytics, and there were several questions abou
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Following up on the discussion last week (see:
> http://markmail.org/thread/jygtlrxv7pfgoumr)
>
> I raised the topic of analytics, and there were several questions about
> the hows and whys. So, taking into account the feedback, here's a
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
