On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:43:37AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:11:51AM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:48:17AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > >> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > >> > Still no expectation on what folks are going to be able to do with the > >> > data. Is it considered private, public, can it be shared external to > >> > the project, etc. > >> > >> Any data not considered public (overall traffic, page views) would be > >> considered private and non-sharable. (Any objections to that?) > > > > Nobody spoke up after this (about the use of data) - any objections with > > this? Thoughts? Comments? Flames? > > > > Sorry I should have responded. > I am a little bemused by the response. > The response was any data not considered public is non-shareable. But > no definition of what is considered public unless it is only what was > in parens (overall traffic, page views).
Only what is in parenthesis, yes. > I assume this means you will be publishing the 'public' stuff > somewhere on a regular basis as part of this initiative? Yes. Monthly, on the blog. > One other question that I assumed, but guess I need to ask - you plan > to do this on ASF hardware right? (request a project VM from infra?) Yeah. -- Joe Brockmeier Twitter: @jzb http://dissociatedpress.net/