Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 7:04 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Alex, do you know enough to fix those instructions?
>
>
Okay.
We talked about the waf file on general@incubator, and we established that
the binary component is a compressed archive of Python code. Chip manually
uncompressed this and verified that it corresponds to the Python source
code in the waf project. Because of this, there is no logical differen
> John Kinsella; nsla...@apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third
> round
> >
> > Quick follow-up:
> >
> > I'm going to hold the vote open a few more days, to give Kevin, John and
> > Noah a chance to cast their v
d...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 1:51 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Will Chan; Kevin Kluge;
> John Kinsella; nsla...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Quick follow-up:
>
&g
please let
> us know.
>
> Jessica
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
unday, October 28, 2012 8:42 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
Okay,
I did a rebuild and the menu populated. Very strange.
Now I have two more problems.
>From the test procedure:
Wait for secondary storage V
On 29 October 2012 00:13, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main) computer
> is
> > practically unusable while it is running. How feasible would it be to
> > provide this DevCloud thing as an AM
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *little* too soon.
>>>
>>> Can someone make the case for "waf" not being a releas
v@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Sig: OK
> Hashes: OK
> Source checks: OK
> RAT: OK
> Build: OK
>
> However, during this:
>
> mvn -P deps
>
> I noticed line like this:
>
> [INFO] Instal
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *little* too soon.
>>
>> Can someone make the case for "waf" not being a release blocker?
>>
>> Everything else can probably slide.
>
> Waf nee
On 28/10/2012, at 5:04 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> I noticed line like this:
>>
>> [INFO] Installing
>>> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/pom.xml to
>>> /Users/nslater/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.0.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/cloudstack-4.0.0-incuba
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main) computer is
> practically unusable while it is running. How feasible would it be to
> provide this DevCloud thing as an AMI? I would much prefer to do this in
> the cloud.
Want to
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *little* too soon.
>
> Can someone make the case for "waf" not being a release blocker?
>
> Everything else can probably slide.
Waf needs to go. No doubt about it. However, I'm not certain it's a
bl
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I was expecting a VM for the storage thing. But that never appeared. I did
> see a line for the VM I created. Either way, this testing step should
> indicate *clearly* what I should be looking for before moving on.
Done.
> As it stands, Clou
Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *little* too soon.
Can someone make the case for "waf" not being a release blocker?
Everything else can probably slide.
On 28 October 2012 17:51, Noah Slater wrote:
> It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main) computer is
> practic
It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main) computer is
practically unusable while it is running. How feasible would it be to
provide this DevCloud thing as an AMI? I would much prefer to do this in
the cloud.
Okay, I made it to this step:
Additional Testing
The instance is re
On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I was expecting a VM for the storage thing. But that never appeared. I did
> see a line for the VM I created. Either way, this testing step should
> indicate *clearly* what I should be looking for before moving on.
>
> As it stands, CloudStack i
I was expecting a VM for the storage thing. But that never appeared. I did
see a line for the VM I created. Either way, this testing step should
indicate *clearly* what I should be looking for before moving on.
As it stands, CloudStack itself is now refusing to answer HTTP requests, so
I am unable
On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Okay,
>
> I did a rebuild and the menu populated. Very strange.
>
> Now I have two more problems.
>
> From the test procedure:
>
> Wait for secondary storage VM coming up.
>> This may take a bit...
>
>
> No clue about this. How do I know wh
Okay,
I did a rebuild and the menu populated. Very strange.
Now I have two more problems.
>From the test procedure:
Wait for secondary storage VM coming up.
> This may take a bit...
No clue about this. How do I know when the storage VM has come up?
I checked under instances and storage and n
ache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Sig: OK
> Hashes: OK
> Source checks: OK
> RAT: OK
> Build: OK
>
> However, during this:
>
> mvn -P deps
>
> I noticed line like this:
>
> [INFO] Installing
> > /private/tmp/cloudstack/a
Yeah. Funny enough, that IS the infra menu option.
I've never seen this before.
I assume you are logged in as admin / password? Can you do a fresh
build (start with "ant clean-all build-all")?
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 27, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I doubt it. Looks l
apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 4:06:44 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
I doubt it. Looks like part of the application code.
My real problem is that I am unable to complete this step, as there is
nothing labeled "Infrastructure"
I doubt it. Looks like part of the application code.
My real problem is that I am unable to complete this step, as there is
nothing labeled "Infrastructure" in the UI.
On 27 October 2012 19:04, Chip Childers wrote:
> Comments below:
>
> - chip
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:
Comments below:
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Sig: OK
> Hashes: OK
> Source checks: OK
> RAT: OK
> Build: OK
>
> However, during this:
>
> mvn -P deps
>
> I noticed line like this:
>
> [INFO] Installing
>> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstac
Sig: OK
Hashes: OK
Source checks: OK
RAT: OK
Build: OK
However, during this:
mvn -P deps
I noticed line like this:
[INFO] Installing
> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/pom.xml to
> /Users/nslater/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.0.0-incubating-SNAP
Huh, interesting. The SVN approach is new to me. I will update CouchDB's
release procedure. Thanks Olivier.
On 25 October 2012 20:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2
Kluge;
>> John Kinsella; nsla...@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks again to everyone that has tested and voted!
>>
>> It looks like we have all of the required votes
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Will Chan; Kevin Kluge;
> John Kinsella; nsla...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks again to everyone that
Here's my +1,
a: Verified keys
➜ cloudstack gpg --recv-keys CC56CEA8
gpg: requesting key CC56CEA8 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
gpg: key CC56CEA8: "Chip Childers " 1 new
signature
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 1
➜ cloudstack gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-
+1
Used the binary bits for rhel6 on centOS 6.3
-xenserver HV
-NSF storage
Advanced zone
3 tier vpc with ACLs for inter VLAN communication.
Also tested VPN connectivity from my Mac running 10.6.8, into my guests
isolated network
Ahmad
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:48 AM, Gavin Lee wrote:
> Still can vote?
> My +1 vote, did not try DevCloud but below testing:
Yup, it counts. I'm holding off for a few more folks to vote before
closing out the thread.
Thanks again for the testing!
> Passed package verification
> Passed source veri
Still can vote?
My +1 vote, did not try DevCloud but below testing:
Passed package verification
Passed source verification
Passed license header verification
Passed compile
Passed installation on CentOS6.2 x64
Create 2 zones successfully:
--1 basic zone with 1 cluster with 1 xenserver 6.02 hyperv
Quick follow-up:
I'm going to hold the vote open a few more days, to give Kevin, John
and Noah a chance to cast their votes.
Will and Edison, thanks for the +1's. (And thanks everyone else!)
-chip
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks again to everyone th
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 (binding).
> I checked sigs, license headers: sounds goo
2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1 (binding).
I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good.
A minor point is the KEYS file available here
>>
; From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On
> Behalf Of Chip Childers (ASF)
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 9:16 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Hi All,
>
> I
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> +1 (binding).
>>> I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good.
>>>
>>> A minor point is the KEYS file available here
>>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchi
2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> +1 (binding).
>> I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good.
>>
>> A minor point is the KEYS file available here
>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS .
>> Perso I would prefer to see it
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 25/10/2012, at 5:11 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, the jars referenced in the legal docs are pulled in by the
>>> packaging process. The expectation was that the material wo
+1
Verified Basic VM Operations using Dev Cloud on VB.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 10:32 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release
Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating (third round).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts, so that
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2012, at 5:11 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> Yes, the jars referenced in the legal docs are pulled in by the
>> packaging process. The expectation was that the material would be
>> brought into any packaging (including the non-asf,
irtio) via an internal
patch)
We're very happy with the state of the release.
- Si
- Original Message -
From: "Chip Childers"
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:40:40 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incub
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 (binding).
> I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good.
>
> A minor point is the KEYS file available here
> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS .
> Perso I would prefer to see it in a scm (most of Apache do that).
+1
Been able to install DevCloud image in VirtualBox and deploy/test this
release following instructions here
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/cloudstack-40-test-procedure.html and
help of Sebastian ;-)
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks again to every
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2012, at 5:11 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm a bit confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE files that are in the root of
>>> the package.
>>>
>>> They seem to be LICENSE/N
Hi all,
Thanks again to everyone that has tested and voted!
It looks like we have all of the required votes at this point, but I'm
going to hold the vote thread open until I see more of the PPMC
members vote. Specifically, I'd like to see Edison, Will, Kevin, John
and hopefully Noah.
If I can a
+1
I've done a couple of tests today, these include:
- Building from source
- Building Debian packages (Uploaded to cloudstack.apt-get.eu as well)
- Add RBD pool
- Remove RBD pool
- Deploy RBD instance from a template
I didn't repeat my complete test suite compared to the previous
artifacts, I
+1 (binding)
I have...
- checked the signature
- reviewed the license, notice, and other text files at the top of the tree
- reviewed the mvn dependency reports to check the list of dependencies used
- confirmed no binaries in the tree
- ran the mvn build
- ran the RAT check
- performed the steps
On 25/10/2012, at 5:11 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> I'm a bit confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE files that are in the root of
>> the package.
>>
>> They seem to be LICENSE/NOTICE files that would be good for a binary
>> distribution o
to:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:32 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> +1
>
> Downloaded:
> > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/rele
base.
> >>
> >> Used the python script example given in the test procedure. Substituted
> the api and secret key in the script with those of the admin account.
> Successfully deployed a VM on the DevCloud Setup using the python script. I
> destroyed the instance via the UI and used the scri
om]
> Sent: 25 October 2012 10:00
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
> +1 Installed on KVM guest with local storage. Ran through a simple
> zone creation. Installed a template. Launched a VPC,
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25 October 2012 10:00
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
+1 Installed on KVM guest with local storage. Ran through a simple
zone creation
+1 (binding).
I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good.
A minor point is the KEYS file available here
http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS .
Perso I would prefer to see it in a scm (most of Apache do that).
Maybe for next release using svnpubsub for dist (at least it wil
*Note: I encountered a problem with deploying my first VM during my first
> attempt. This is due to my mistake where I overlooked the requirement to
> change the memory required for DevCloud VM from 1024 to 2046MB. I repeated
> the entire test procedure(except the pre-requisites) the secon
ndan.
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 11:11 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Kulp
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I'm a bit confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE files that are in the root of
> the package.
>
> They seem to be LICENSE/NOTICE files that would be good for a binary
> distribution of Cloudstack built from this package, but don't really apply
I'm a bit confused by the LICENSE and NOTICE files that are in the root of the
package.
They seem to be LICENSE/NOTICE files that would be good for a binary
distribution of Cloudstack built from this package, but don't really apply to
this package. Or maybe they were from before the dep jars
ders [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 2:48 AM
To: Chip Childers (ASF)
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would
>
> My vote is +1 .
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Sailaja.M
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: chip.child...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf
> Of Chip Childers (ASF)
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 9:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubato
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating (third round).
>
Signature is valid - (do wish there was more connection in the key,
but assume that will get solved over time)
Chec
fork)
>
> Regards.
>
> From: Edison Su [edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:19 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Chip Childers (ASF)
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third
[edison...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:19 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Chip Childers (ASF)
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
It's a build issue, nothing related to our code.
> -Original Message-
> Fr
.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 2:18 PM
> To: Chip Childers (ASF)
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third
> round
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF)
> wr
-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating (third ro
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF)
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
> 4.0.0-incubating (third round).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artifacts, so that any critical issues can b
[mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of
Chip Childers (ASF)
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 9:46 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
Hi All,
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
4.0.0
...@sungard.com [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] On Behalf Of
Chip Childers (ASF)
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 9:46 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
Hi All,
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating
Kelven
Response in line..
Thanks
Ilya
On Oct 22, 2012, at 8:41 PM, "Kelven Yang"
mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Mussyev,
Please see my answers inline
Kelven
On 10/22/12 3:42 PM, "Musayev, Ilya"
mailto:imusa...@webmd.net>> wrote:
Test case 3 and 4 wording has been changed, see bel
Mussyev,
Please see my answers inline
Kelven
On 10/22/12 3:42 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>Test case 3 and 4 wording has been changed, see below.
>
>On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:34 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
>
>> Following issues has been witnessed thus far:
>>
>> I'm just going to provide the outpu
Test case 3 and 4 wording has been changed, see below.
On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:34 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:
> Following issues has been witnessed thus far:
>
> I'm just going to provide the output of my tests and you be the judge if it's
> bug or an error on my part - I can then submit a bug re
Following issues has been witnessed thus far:
I'm just going to provide the output of my tests and you be the judge if it's
bug or an error on my part - I can then submit a bug report if needed.
1 - when configuring VMware ESXi environment initially primary store cannot be
set as VMFS and must
Hi All,
I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
4.0.0-incubating (third round).
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
artifacts, so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
release is made. The more time that each individual
75 matches
Mail list logo
