Test case 3 and 4 wording has been changed, see below.

On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:34 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net> wrote:

> Following issues has been witnessed thus far:
> 
> I'm just going to provide the output of my tests and you be the judge if it's 
> bug or an error on my part - I can then submit a bug report if needed.
> 
> 1 - when configuring VMware ESXi environment initially primary store cannot 
> be set as VMFS and must be configured as NFS for setup to work. I could not 
> get VMFS to work as primary storage without adding NFS as primary first. 
> (need to confirm if VMFS will still works as primary - post adding NFS as 
> primary - as of now I just use NFS as primary storage)
> 
> 2 - if VMFS LUN is incorrectly set while going through initial setup process 
> (not using first time wizard - since VMware ESXi Cluster is not an option) 
> and user mistakenly enters improper LUN, the UI will detect as an error but 
> even if you correct it - there is no way to continue the setup process and no 
> API calls are issued to confirm the validity of the new LUN name. at this 
> point, I had to start over from scratch.
> 
> 3. Don't know if this would-be a bug or feature enhacement. While adding a 
> vmware cluster - the CS is specifically looking for "Management Network" port 
> group on vSwitch0. If name does not match - you could see an error that 
> "Management Network" portgroup is not found. The prefered logic  would be to 
> lookup the portgroup of vmk0 (or whatever management virtual NIC is) and use 
> it as your portgroup.
> 
> 4. If your VMware cluster has virtual switch vSwitch0 used for outbound 
> network communication and another vSwitch1 for other internal private tasks 
> with no outbound network connectivity - when the Secondary storage VM is 
> deployed it incorrectly picks vSwitch1 and attempts to use this vswitch for 
> communication with CS core. Obviously fails since no NICs are connected to 
> vSwitch1.
> 
> 5. This seems to have been the case for me all the time - but by default - 
> the first time wizard does not have VMware cluster as an option. I always to 
> choose 'Skip, I've used cloud stack before' button.
> 
> 6. If I attempt to do a complete cleanup without flushing DB, I'm unable to 
> delete physical network connection - eventhough no networks are 
> defined/assigned - and therefore I cannot delete the zone. I had to drop 
> mysql db and start fresh.
> 
> 7. The cloud ssh and password scripts still need a bit more enhancement - I 
> will submit the patch shortly. I also think we can do more improvements on 
> the way code is written without changing functionality.
> 
> * None of these are show stoppers - but things I've noticed when I went 
> through install process. At the end, I was able to get it to work.
> 
> Let me know which are bugs and I will file a bug report with supporting 
> documentation.
> 
> I will go through install process once more next week or later this week to 
> double check and note all the issues. I will also be testing Netscaler 
> integration.
> 
> Regards
> Ilya
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 22, 2012, at 12:17 PM, "Chip Childers (ASF)" <chipchild...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release
>> 4.0.0-incubating (third round).
>> 
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> artifacts, so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>> release is made. The more time that each individual spends reviewing
>> the artifacts, the higher confidence we can have in both the release
>> itself and our ability to pass an IPMC vote later on.  Everyone is free
>> to vote on this release, so please give it a shot.
>> 
>> Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure
>> 
>> If you have any trouble setting up a test environment using the
>> procedure above, please ask on the cloudstack-dev@i.a.o list.  Someone
>> will be sure to help, and we'll improve our test procedure
>> documentation at the same time!
>> 
>> Now, on to the specifics of what we are voting on...
>> 
>> 
>> The following artifacts are up for the vote:
>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0.0-incubating/
>> 
>> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58):
>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS
>> 
>> Branch: 4.0
>> Commit: 6355965dcd956811dd471a9d03c73dadcf68f480
>> 
>> 
>> List of changes:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0
>> 
>> The artifacts being voted on during this round also include the
>> following additional fixes (most were identified as part of testing
>> during the last round of voting):
>> 
>> * Many documentation fixes (particularly the release notes and
>> installation guide)
>> * CLOUDSTACK-341: Failing to display Management Traffic Details on the UI
>> * CLOUDSTACK-349: Russian l10n not properly displaying
>> * Correction to the devcloud rdeploy build target, to make testing easier
>> * CLOUDSTACK-363: Upgrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build will fail
>> * CLOUDSTACK-118: Status of host resorce stuck in "ErrorInMaintenance"
>> * DISCLAIMER added to the Marvin tool dir
>> 
>> 
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> 
>> 
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be
>> sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> [ ] +1  approve
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to