Alex, do you know enough to fix those instructions? On 30 October 2012 01:01, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote:
> +1 Sorry for being late because I've been tied up in other stuff and > because the instruction doesn't work on windows (yeah yeah windows > wmindows). But I finally gave it a quick test and it worked. > > --Alex > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 1:51 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Edison Su; Will Chan; Kevin > Kluge; > > John Kinsella; nsla...@apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third > round > > > > Quick follow-up: > > > > I'm going to hold the vote open a few more days, to give Kevin, John and > > Noah a chance to cast their votes. > > > > Will and Edison, thanks for the +1's. (And thanks everyone else!) > > > > -chip > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Chip Childers < > chip.child...@sungard.com> > > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Thanks again to everyone that has tested and voted! > > > > > > It looks like we have all of the required votes at this point, but I'm > > > going to hold the vote thread open until I see more of the PPMC > > > members vote. Specifically, I'd like to see Edison, Will, Kevin, John > > > and hopefully Noah. > > > > > > If I can at least get 4 of the 5 folks to vote, I'll close it out. > > > Ideally, we would close it out today... > > > > > > -chip > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Chip Childers > > > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > > >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chip Childers (ASF) > > >> <chipchild...@apache.org> wrote: > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) > > >>> Release 4.0.0-incubating (third round). > > >>> > > >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these > > release > > >>> artifacts, so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > > >>> release is made. The more time that each individual spends reviewing > > >>> the artifacts, the higher confidence we can have in both the release > > >>> itself and our ability to pass an IPMC vote later on. Everyone is > > >>> free to vote on this release, so please give it a shot. > > >>> > > >>> Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found > here: > > >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4. > > >>> 0+test+procedure > > >>> > > >>> If you have any trouble setting up a test environment using the > > >>> procedure above, please ask on the cloudstack-dev@i.a.o list. > > >>> Someone will be sure to help, and we'll improve our test procedure > > >>> documentation at the same time! > > >>> > > >>> Now, on to the specifics of what we are voting on... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> The following artifacts are up for the vote: > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0. > > >>> 0-incubating/ > > >>> > > >>> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58): > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS > > >>> > > >>> Branch: 4.0 > > >>> Commit: 6355965dcd956811dd471a9d03c73dadcf68f480 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> List of changes: > > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a > > >>> =blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0 > > >>> > > >>> The artifacts being voted on during this round also include the > > >>> following additional fixes (most were identified as part of testing > > >>> during the last round of voting): > > >>> > > >>> * Many documentation fixes (particularly the release notes and > > >>> installation guide) > > >>> * CLOUDSTACK-341: Failing to display Management Traffic Details on > > >>> the UI > > >>> * CLOUDSTACK-349: Russian l10n not properly displaying > > >>> * Correction to the devcloud rdeploy build target, to make testing > > >>> easier > > >>> * CLOUDSTACK-363: Upgrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build > > >>> will fail > > >>> * CLOUDSTACK-118: Status of host resorce stuck in > > "ErrorInMaintenance" > > >>> * DISCLAIMER added to the Marvin tool dir > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be > > >>> sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > >>> [ ] +1 approve > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >>> > > >>> Thanks! > > >> > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> 1 day down, and we have 2 +1 votes so far. Please take an > > >> opportunity to test and cast your vote! > > >> > > >> -chip > -- NS
