..@163.com [mailto:yuel...@163.com] On Behalf Of
> cloudsta...@163.com
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] systemvms
>
>
> where can i find patches/systemvm/debian/build ? my OS is centos5.6.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>
> Convenience binaries can come from asf-hosted servers. They just
> aren't 'releases', and we'd still have to comply with the terms of the
> license. (and we'd need blessing from ASF-legal - and have the
> authority to red
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> In general, you have to comply with all the terms of all the software inside
> the VM. For a Linux distro like the System VM, that means meeting the GPL
> requirements from the kernel and operating system tools in particular. This
> means
nk.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 20 July 2012 14:07
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs
>
> Question about license.
> What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux
> distribution?
>
> > -Original Mess
where can i find patches/systemvm/debian/build ? my OS is centos5.6.
At 2012-07-22 15:12:22,"Edison Su" wrote:
>Build a systemvm is pretty easy: just run patches/systemvm/debian/build
>systemvm.sh on a Ubuntu machine
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jul 21, 2012, at 7:05 AM, "yueluck" wrote:
>
>>
Build a systemvm is pretty easy: just run patches/systemvm/debian/build
systemvm.sh on a Ubuntu machine
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 21, 2012, at 7:05 AM, "yueluck" wrote:
> when users can get the documents about how to build systemVM step by step?
>
>
> At 2012-07-10 01:23:22,"Kevin Kluge"
when users can get the documents about how to build systemVM step by step?
At 2012-07-10 01:23:22,"Kevin Kluge" wrote:
>> Are you saying that you think that Apache CloudStack can provide Debian-
>> based systemVMs as part of a release (or in any other manner)?
>> If so, I am missing something.
nt: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:56 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] SystemVMs
So the final OSCON discussion:
We discussed SystemVMs, how they are created.
What we should/must do:
Have a documented way for folks to create the system VMs from source.
(I think we already have
Question about license.
What's license for system vm itself as it's actually a linux distribution?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 1:56 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCU
So the final OSCON discussion:
We discussed SystemVMs, how they are created.
What we should/must do:
Have a documented way for folks to create the system VMs from source.
(I think we already have this to a degree, but we should review it)
Ensure that all of the CloudStack pieces of the system VMs
> Are you saying that you think that Apache CloudStack can provide Debian-
> based systemVMs as part of a release (or in any other manner)?
> If so, I am missing something. And I would love for this to not be the case,
> I
> just don't see how we can ship a big blob of GPL software given the
> gu
On Jul 6, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Correct! Due to licensing we are however not allowed to distribute it in the
> official releases. But we can always write a script:
>
> $ cloud-download-and-install-systemvm /srv/my-secondary-storage
>
> If URL is not specified it will dow
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> I had mentioned this concern (licensing and system VM presence) in the
> earliest Apache discussions, and I included it in the CloudStack project
> proposal at [1]. I had been told that it was a non-issue. That is, as long
> as the code in
oving+dependencies+to+ASF+approved+licenses
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 1:03 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] systemvms
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent a bit o
On 07/06/2012 01:04 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
On 7/5/12 11:58 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
Right now you have to download this weird qcow2 from the CS website, but
that should be different I think:
You set up CloudStack, configure your zone and then it will ask you to
provide the System VM
On 7/5/12 11:58 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>>>
>>>Right now you have to download this weird qcow2 from the CS website, but
>>>that should be different I think:
>>>
>>>You set up CloudStack, configure your zone and then it will ask you to
>>>provide the System VM template.
>>>
>>>We can still prov
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Ah, Wido puts it much better. David's email kind of alarmed me.
What did I say that alarmed you?? :)
If it makes you feel better your email alarms me :)
>
>
> On 7/5/12 7:24 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>
>>I agree. In ess
Ah, Wido puts it much better. David's email kind of alarmed me.
On 7/5/12 7:24 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
[snip]
>
>I agree. In essence the System VM's are more (talking KVM-wise!) than a
>Debian installation with the Java agent running in them.
In the future, there may be even be multipl
On 04-07-12 22:02, David Nalley wrote:
Hi folks,
I spent a bit of time going through the patches directory and working
on license headers today.
Historically CloudStack has made a Debian-based systemvm template
available for each hypervisor. However, my sense is that going forward
we will not
Hi folks,
I spent a bit of time going through the patches directory and working
on license headers today.
Historically CloudStack has made a Debian-based systemvm template
available for each hypervisor. However, my sense is that going forward
we will not be able to do this because of licensing is
20 matches
Mail list logo
