when users can get the documents about how to build systemVM step by step?
At 2012-07-10 01:23:22,"Kevin Kluge" <kevin.kl...@citrix.com> wrote: >> Are you saying that you think that Apache CloudStack can provide Debian- >> based systemVMs as part of a release (or in any other manner)? >> If so, I am missing something. And I would love for this to not be the >> case, I >> just don't see how we can ship a big blob of GPL software given the >> guidelines that we are expected to follow. >> > >We need to be careful with defining "ship". Clearly we aren't releasing >GPL-licensed software. The system template isn't a binary dep in the same >sense as the other deps we are changing or removing to comply with ASF release >criteria. This may limit where we could host a built system VM template, but >even with some limitations we shouldn't let that block an ACS release. If >you have continued concerns about this we should surface them quickly as this >would be a big addition to the ACS release scope (at least from what I was >expecting). Ideally we would be able to have a discussion with whoever will >ultimately decide if this is allowed. > > >> The only conversation I see on it from the proposal period is [1], am I >> missing >> a thread somewhere? > >These conversations occurred when I was working to understand what challenges >would exist if there were an "Apache CloudStack" project, prior to a project >submission. That discussion wasn't public. > >-kevin
