Need to download CloudStack source code, or you can find the latest file from:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=blob;f=patches/systemvm/debian/buildsystemvm.sh;h=090a0827e6b13d56e48cc23b0c1cf67b5863b401;hb=HEAD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yuel...@163.com [mailto:yuel...@163.com] On Behalf Of
> cloudsta...@163.com
> Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:39 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] systemvms
> 
> 
> where can i find patches/systemvm/debian/build ? my OS is centos5.6.
> 
> At 2012-07-22 15:12:22,"Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >Build a systemvm is pretty easy: just run
> patches/systemvm/debian/build systemvm.sh on a Ubuntu machine
> >
> >Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >On Jul 21, 2012, at 7:05 AM, "yueluck" <yuel...@163.com> wrote:
> >
> >> when users can get the documents about  how to build systemVM step
> by step?
> >>
> >>
> >> At 2012-07-10 01:23:22,"Kevin Kluge" <kevin.kl...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>> Are you saying that you think that Apache CloudStack can provide
> Debian-
> >>>> based systemVMs as part of a release (or in any other manner)?
> >>>> If so, I am missing something.  And I would love for this to not
> be the case, I
> >>>> just don't see how we can ship a big blob of GPL software given
> the
> >>>> guidelines that we are expected to follow.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> We need to be careful with defining "ship".  Clearly we aren't
> releasing GPL-licensed software.  The system template isn't a binary
> dep in the same sense as the other deps we are changing or removing to
> comply with ASF release criteria.  This may limit where we could host a
> built system VM template, but even with some limitations we shouldn't
> let that block an ACS release.   If you have continued concerns about
> this we should surface them quickly as this would be a big addition to
> the ACS release scope (at least from what I was expecting).  Ideally we
> would be able to have a discussion with whoever will ultimately decide
> if this is allowed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The only conversation I see on it from the proposal period is [1],
> am I missing
> >>>> a thread somewhere?
> >>>
> >>> These conversations occurred when I was working to understand what
> challenges would exist if there were an "Apache CloudStack" project,
> prior to a project submission.  That discussion wasn't public.
> >>>
> >>> -kevin

Reply via email to