Dear Cloudstack developers,
I have a scenario with a management-server, 3 host servers and some NFS storage.
However I am experiencing some issues:
I already have a zone configured working without issues. (Advanced)
Management-network: x.x.6.10-x.x.6.60 - Guest network: x.x.6.100-x.x.6.200
Ad
+1 for Gerrit.
From: Sanjay Tripathi [sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:23 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
+1 for Gerrit.
> -Original Message-
> From: S
+1 for Gerrit.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 11:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> +1 for review p
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:29 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...
>>
>>
>> I've had some folks express interesting in setting up Gerrit for code
>> reviews.
>> That said - it's not like we can't review code that is already
>> committed - we get commit
+1 for review process through Gerrit
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 04 February 2013 00:20
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:2
+1 for gerrit.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 20
+1 on gerrit. For example very grateful that mice put his changes on vm
snapshots on reviewboard.
I really disagree with code commit bring a privilege of committers.
--Alex
David Nalley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus So
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 5:29 AM, David Nalley wrote:
...
>
>
> I've had some folks express interesting in setting up Gerrit for code reviews.
> That said - it's not like we can't review code that is already
> committed - we get commit mails after all. Gerrit just helps automate
> some of that.
Dav
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>> Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something similar
>> just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a whole can be
>> evaluated, or are you just c
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 10:47 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> I find it way too
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers
> wrote:
>> Heya all,
>>
>> I find it way too early to cut a 4.1 release branch. I now that this is what
>> we agreed to do, but the way we are going at it doesn't sit right with me.
>> The si
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Hey Marcus,
>
> We do have another month or soto fix things. My main worry is the amount of
> things that we still have to fix. The current consensus is that we have a
> release manager who does the cherry picking of fixes from master to t
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something similar
> just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a whole can be
> evaluated, or are you just concerned that the last minute features didn't
> get proper
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> I find it way too early to cut a 4.1 release branch. I now that this is what
> we agreed to do, but the way we are going at it doesn't sit right with me.
> The simple fact that we have some mayor code changes forced into maste
dapt the codebase as per new
> > design.
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Hugo
> >>
> >>
> >> From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
> >> Sen
rush.
>
> IMO 4.2 would be the actual version we would see radical changes,
> hoping we fix a lot of leftover tasks, adapt the codebase as per new
> design.
>
> Regards.
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>> From: Marcus Sorensen
t the end in a rush.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
> From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> I
t;
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
> From: Marcus Sorensen [shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> I understand the reservat
; So what do you guys think?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
> From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 2:27 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> On Feb 1, 2013, at 1
heck-in to 4.1. If we find "features" being sneaked in,
> then it would make sense for us to lockdown 4.1, which makes bug fixing and
> unit testing checkins a laborious process.
> >>
> >> --Alex
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>
t do you guys think?
Cheers,
Hugo
From: Chip Childers [chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 2:27 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
On Feb 1, 2013, at 11:42 PM, Mice Xia wrote:
> Does this mean features havent been merged into master will be postponed
t;>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:58 PM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Looks like Kelvin f
d unit testing
> checkins a laborious process.
>
> --Alex
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:58 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [ACS41] 4.1 bran
]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 5:58 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> Hi all,
>
> Looks like Kelvin finished the merge of javelin into master, so I went
> ahead and branched master for the 4.1 release (after mistake
Hi all,
Looks like Kelvin finished the merge of javelin into master, so I went
ahead and branched master for the 4.1 release (after mistakenly doing
the same for 4.2... jumping the gun by a few months ;-) )
This isn't a "locked down" branch right now, but I'd ask committers to
respect the featur
25 matches
Mail list logo
