On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something similar > just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a whole can be > evaluated, or are you just concerned that the last minute features didn't > get proper review? I think that as long as there's a time-based release > were going to have features rushed, we either need to be OK with it and > allow for time and ability to fix it afterward, or have some very stringent > quality control prior to merge. We can maybe start with the former and work > toward the latter.
That's exactly right. We're either going to do time-based release schedules, or we're not. And if we are doing time-based releases we need to be concerned about the quality of commits coming into master. Anyone want to get gerrit up and running? I'd be more than happy if we had a strict review process for ALL commits coming into master, regardless of commit access permissions.
