+1 for gerrit. Regards, Devdeep
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:20 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Are you thinking there should be a regular moratorium or something > > similar just before the cut, so that the quality of the features as a > > whole can be evaluated, or are you just concerned that the last minute > > features didn't get proper review? I think that as long as there's a > > time-based release were going to have features rushed, we either need > > to be OK with it and allow for time and ability to fix it afterward, > > or have some very stringent quality control prior to merge. We can > > maybe start with the former and work toward the latter. > > That's exactly right. We're either going to do time-based release schedules, > or we're not. And if we are doing time-based releases we need to be > concerned about the quality of commits coming into master. > Anyone want to get gerrit up and running? I'd be more than happy if we had a > strict review process for ALL commits coming into master, regardless of > commit access permissions.
