Hi All,
Today i got the following problem. I have servers with 4x2Ghz CPUs, so it was
reasonable for me to create computational offers like 1x2GHz, 2x2GHz etc. But i
failed to deploy VMs using that offers. The reason was - actual cpu frequency
is 1995 Mhz, so allocator didn't pass test. To resol
if support for
xcp 1.6 was officially included into 4.1 version or i need to tweak code a bit.
> Hi Dan,
>
> The bugs cloudstack-83 looks very similar to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647. A fix for this
> was checked in 4.1 branch. However, it was only teste
Hi all,
I found on Jira that CLOUDSTACK-83 back closed, but i can reproduce it 100 %.
Setup is not standard - cs-4.0.0 + XCP 1.6.10. Maybe it will help to avoid that
issue in future. Im ready to provide any logs. Let me know.
Dan/borei
probably noticed there
>> >> are a lot of questions related to that VMs. Will it be good idea to
>> >> move that VMs out of CloudStack, so they will be fully segregated
>> >> from the cloud controlled by CS and from user's VMs. Eventually
>> >> Clouds
Hosts (or VMs) and CP Hosts (or VMs) and Users
>> Environment - Computational Hosts, VMs and Storage. Any thoughts
>> about it ?
>>
>> Dan/borei.
>>
>>
>> This message was sent using IMP, th
controlled by CS and from
user's VMs. Eventually Cloudstack System will be - System Environment -
Management Hosts (or VMs), SS Hosts (or VMs) and CP Hosts (or VMs) and Users
Environment - Computational Hosts, VMs and Storage. Any thoughts about it ?
Dan/
Is CloudPlatform available for public download or it's commercial product ?
> Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the
> project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the
> community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. Th
>From my understanding it will be product line separation. Is it correct ?
> Dan, Citrix shipped a “Citrix CloudPlatform 3.0.3”. Based on the
> project now being run as an Apache project and feedback from the
> community we (Citrix hat on) did not ship a CloudStack 3.0.3. The
&g
p me. I'll be looking around what
can be done and how to adjust F5 module to support partition model, but as i
see it will not be easy task for me. At this moment i screwed my CS
installation need to fix it. BTW do you have any information about 3.0.3
release ?
> Dan, when we did the o
, for exmaple:
CloudStack vlan name: vlan-652
BIG-IP returns "/Common/vlan-652"
>From my understanding CloudStack module need to be redesigned to support F5
>partitioning, or partition name need to be stripped from each F5 object. Could
>you please confirm it.
Dan/bo
Hi Frank,
Thanks for reply. Found it. Everything is ok now (i mean deployment from rpm).
> Run
> ./waf rpm
> in root folder.
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Daniel Mezentsev [mailto:d...@soleks.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 1:42 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
Hi All,
I got Cloudstack UI broken after upgrade 3.0.2 --> git (3.0.3). Detailed log is
here
http://pastebin.com/yw62y7Qs
running under tomcat 6.0.24, all stock centos jdk
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging
Agree, that 3 symptoms describe 3 level of 7-layer OSI model.
no routing to host - Layer 3 (IP layer)
connection refused - Layer 4 (transport - TCP/UDP)
connection reset - Layer 5 (session layer) or higher
> 1. Sounds like a routing issue. Packet flow cant reach the destination.
> 2. So
Hi All,
I created new public network via infrastructure->zone->physical
network->public->IP range menu. and assigned it to account in non-root domain.
Private network was also created for that account. When i use that account and
trying to request IP, IP was chosen from default public network,
14 matches
Mail list logo
