first subnet which has free IPs.
Also we do not allow addition of a subnet which is superset of the existing
subnet.
Bharat.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>
> On 3/11/13 5:13 AM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>
>> Hi Chiradeep,
>>
&
If the remove fails add will also fail.
Bharat.
On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> If the remove fails, will the add still succeed?
>
> On 3/5/13 11:20 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>
>> The changes will be atomic.
>> before removing any ra
>>
>>
>> On 1/25/13 2:54 PM, "Manan Shah" wrote:
>>
>>> Can you please identify what is being done in the FS? I am still not
>>> clear. For the functionality that already works, are you modifying them?
>>> How are you going to han
ing range E= 100-200, in use U=101,121,131
> New request: add=201-301, remove=100-201
>
> Or
> E = 100-200, U=110-120
> A = 150-250, R=100-149
>
> etc
>
> On 1/24/13 10:13 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>
>> Thank you Manan for pointing this out i intend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588461#comment-13588461
]
Bharat Kumar edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-1410 at 2/27/13 4:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13588461#comment-13588461
]
Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-1410:
--
Thanks for fixing this wi
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1395:
Summary: Upgrade script for cpu and memory overcommit feature.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1395
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1395
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar resolved CLOUDSTACK-711.
-
Resolution: Fixed
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1384:
Summary: Cloudstack might show usage > 100% when overcommit ratio
is decreased.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1384
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1
/capacity/CapacityManagerTest.java PRE-CREATION
server/test/com/cloud/resource/MockResourceManagerImpl.java 889318b
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareHelper.java 47ff8e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/
Testing
---
Did manual testing.
Thanks,
bharat
testing.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
anges for memory for a VM because of overcommit - can you please
> detail what the setting before this change was and what you intend to do
> because of this feature?
>
> Hari
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesda
/13 10:28 PM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi"
> wrote:
>
>>> -----Original Message-
>>> From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: 20 February 2013 18:18
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Regardi
The cpu and ram overcommit feature depends on availability hypervisor specific
features like DMC in case of xenserver.
The availability of these features depends on the type of licenses that are
being used. Enabling these features requires changing the license
and i think should be done by a
e current implementation changing the overcommit ratio will not
> have immediate affect on the VM already running.
>
> -abhi
>
> On 13/02/13 4:19 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After some discussion i think the new overcommit r
/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java 1838ed2
server/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineProfileImpl.java e83d6a0
vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/util/VmwareHelper.java 47ff8e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/
Testing
---
Did manual testing.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
Hi All,
After some discussion i think the new overcommit ratio should not affect
the VMs already deployed. It will only effect the VMs deployed after the change.
I we need to reconfigure the previously running VMs we need to stop start them.
I will call this out in the Functional spec.
Bha
the overcommit ratios on
> existing vms ?
> I don¹t see these ratios being changed quite often in the cloud.
>
> On 12/02/13 2:57 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As a part of this feature we need to implement a method to update the
>> ove
Hi all,
As a part of this feature we need to implement a method to update the
overcommit ratios.
when we update the overcommit ratios all the Vms in the cluster need to be
reconfigured as per the new values.
In order to do this i need to send some commands to the hypervisor and would
like thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-711:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> CPU and Mem
apacity calculation is a generic logic?
>
>
> -Prachi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:44 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: FW: Regarding Cpu and
/VirtualMachineProfileImpl.java e83d6a0
server/test/com/cloud/capacity/CapacityManagerTest.java PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/
Testing
---
Did manual testing.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
r/9156/#review15865
---
On Jan. 30, 2013, 3:05 p.m., bharat kumar wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9
Nitin thanks for the review comments. will create a branch and fix the issues.
Bharat.
On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:35 PM, bharat kumar
mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com>> wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/
Review reque
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-1098:
-
Summary: Discuss what should we display on the dashboard. (was: Discuss
what
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-1098:
Summary: Discuss what should we display on the dash board.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-1098
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1098
Project: CloudStack
://reviews.apache.org/r/9156/diff/
Testing (updated)
---
Did manual testing.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-701:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.2.0
> Support non-contigu
Hi Manan,
find my answers inline.
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:22 AM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Hi Bharat Kumar,
>
> I have some additional questions regarding this spec.
>
> 1. Can you specify the scope of your feature? Assuming you are only
> addressing the Guest IP part and not
>
>> Bharat, I have created a JIRA ticket as well as requirements page for this
>> requirement. Please leverage that.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Manan Shah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/13 10:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:
>>
>&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-702:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.2)
4.2.0
> Multiple IP Ran
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-702:
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0)
4.0.2
> Multiple IP Ran
; specific cluster , are we going to use cluster level tag, Or we are going to
> use dedicated resource method as described in FS.
>
I think we will use dedicated resources for now and may be in future implement
something like cluster tags.
> Thanks
> Prashant kumar Mishra
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555858#comment-13555858
]
Bharat Kumar edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-702 at 1/21/13 8:2
guous management IP ranges supported?
yes.
>
> 7. Is this supported in upgraded environment?
The upgrade will not modify the existing ip ranges. we can just add new ip
ranges after the upgrade.
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjeev
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bharat
Hi All,
I have included the information form the discussions in the functional spec
and I think we have sufficient information to start the implementation.
-Original Message-
From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, 17 January 2013 11:01 PM
To
gt; the planner. If there's anything you need to change in CloudStack
> core/server, please point that out in a subtask for your bug and let me know.
>
> --Alex
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555860#comment-13555860
]
Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-701:
-
link to the functional spec.
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555858#comment-13555858
]
Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-702:
-
link to the functional spec.
h
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15304
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- bharat kumar
On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review15303
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- bharat kumar
On Jan. 13, 2013, 5:14 p.m
2a0dfc8
server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6
server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/
Testing
---
I have tested this on the asf branch.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
/VMTemplateDaoImpl.java 2a0dfc8
server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6
server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/
Testing
---
I have tested this on the asf branch.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-970:
---
Summary: when a template is deleted and then copied over again ,
it is still marked as "Removed" in template_zone_ref table.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-970
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13550994#comment-13550994
]
Bharat Kumar commented on CLOUDSTACK-711:
-
link to the functional spec.
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar reassigned CLOUDSTACK-711:
---
Assignee: Bharat Kumar (was: Nitin Mehta)
> CPU and Memory OverCom
feature allows adding multiple management ip ranges in advanced and basic
zones, and guest ip ranges in basic zones.
Regards,
Bharat Kumar.
Hi Hari,
A host can have more than one tag so we need not overwrite the inherited
cluster tag of a host, if a host specific tag is added.
Bharat
On Dec 26, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Presently in Cloudstack there is a provision for cpu overcomm
ranges.
This feature will enable adding non contiguous vlan ranges.
Regards,
Bharat Kumar.
np but if not then also there is
> no issue but dashboard reporting would look confusing.
>
>
>> 1. if there is no conflict, there is no issue
>> 2a. if there is a conflict (i.e. current allocation would conflict with the
>> new value) - should we reject
n't it have any performance issues
> ?
>
> Thanks,
> Pranav
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bharat Kumar [mailto:bharat.ku...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 6:09 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
>
t/pool API also use
> this factor. Please make sure that you take care of that as well.
Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> -Nitin
>
> On 26-Dec-2012, at 11:32 AM, Bharat Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Presently in Cloudstack there is a provision for cpu overc
cluster basis.
2.) ram overcommit feature in xen and kvm. ( It is there for VMware.)
3.) Updating the overcommit ratios of a cluster.
Regards,
Bharat Kumar.
possible solution to fix this bug ?.
Regards,
Bharat Kumar.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bharat Kumar updated CLOUDSTACK-568:
Affects Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.0.0
> Sou
Bharat Kumar created CLOUDSTACK-568:
---
Summary: Source template id is recorded incorrectly.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-568
Project: CloudStack
de2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/
Testing
---
I have tested this on the asf branch.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
/storage/dao/VMTemplateDaoImpl.java 2a0dfc8
server/src/com/cloud/template/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6
server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/
Testing
---
I have tested this on the asf branch.
Thanks,
bharat
/HyervisorTemplateAdapter.java bdb89f6
server/src/com/cloud/template/TemplateManagerImpl.java 1e87de2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/diff/
Testing
---
I have tested this on the asf branch.
Thanks,
bharat kumar
60 matches
Mail list logo
